Autologous bone flap versus hydroxyapatite prosthesis in first intention in secondary cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: A French medico-economical study

Neurochirurgie

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 60-63

  Lemee J M ^a   Petit, D ^a   Splingard, M ^b   Menei, P ^a  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b ETABLISSEMENT FRANÇAIS DU SANG   (France)

Author keywords

Autograft; Cost; Cranioplasty; Hydroxyapatite

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BONE GRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOPLASTY; DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROSURGERY; PROSTHESIS; REIMBURSEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY; DURAPATITE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INTENTION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SKULL; SURGICAL FLAPS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 84877141195     PISSN: 00283770     EISSN: 17730619     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2012.10.138     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Artico M., Ferrante L., Pastore F.S., Ramundo E.O., Cantarelli D., Scopelliti D., et al. Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature. Surg. Neurol. 2003, 60:71-79.
2. Balossier A., Durand A., Achim V.V., Noudel R., Hurel S., Emery E. Reconstruction of the cranial vault using CAD/CAM-fabricated glass bioceramic implants. Neurochirurgie 2011, 57:21-27.
3. Baumeister S., Peek A., Friedman A., Levin L.S., Marcus J.R. Management of postneurosurgical bone flap loss caused by infection. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008, 122:195e-208e.
4. Beauchamp K.M., Kashuk J., Moore E.E., Bolles G., Rabb C., Seinfeld J., et al. Cranioplasty after postinjury decompressive craniectomy: is timing of the essence?. J. Trauma. 2010, 69:270-274.
5. Inamasu J., Kuramae T., Nakatsukasa M. Does difference in the storage method of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomy affect the incidence of surgical site infection after cranioplasty? Comparison between subcutaneous pocket and cryopreservation. J. Trauma. 2010, 68:183-187. (discussion 187).
6. Moreira-gonzalez A., Jackson I.T., Miyawaki T., Barakat K., Dinick V. Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up. J. Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:144-153.
7. Servadei F. Clinical value of decompressive craniectomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364:1558-1559.
8. Staffa G., Nataloni A., Compagnone C., Servadei F. Custom-made cranioplasty prostheses in porous hydroxy-apatite using 3D design techniques: 7 years experience in 25 patients. Acta. Neurochir. (Wien) 2007, 149:161-170. (discussion 170).
9. Staffa G., Barbanera A., Faiola A., Fricia M., Limoni P., Mottaran R., Zanotti B., Stefini R. Custom-made bioceramic implants in complex and large cranial reconstruction: a two-year follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012, 40(3):e65-e70. (Epub 2011 Jun 2).
10. Yadla S., Campbell P.G., Chitale R., Maltenfort M.G., Jabbour P., Sharan A.D. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 2011, 68:1124-1129. (discussion 1130).