Helping ocean scientists represent and communicate Science

Oceanography

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 98-105

  deCharon, Annette ^a   Duguay, Linda ^b   McDonnell, Janice ^c   Peach, Cheryl ^d   Companion, Carla ^a   Herren, Christen ^a   Harcourt, Patricia ^b   Repa, Theodore ^e   Ferraro, Carrie ^c   Kwon, Patricia ^f   Lichtenwalner, Sage ^c   Simms, Eric ^d   Whitley, Lynn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e TOURO COLLEGE   (United States)

^f Touro College and University System ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877132719     PISSN: 10428275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2013.08     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arnaudin, M.W., J.J. Mintzes, C.S. Dun, and T.H. Shafer. 1984. Concept mapping in college science teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching 14(2):117-121.
2. Ault, C.R. Jr. 1985. Concept mapping as a study strategy in Earth science. Journal of College Science Teaching 15:38-44.
3. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 374 pp.
4. Briscoe, C., and S.U. LeMaster. 1991. Meaningful learning in college biology through concept mapping. American Biology Teacher 53(4):213-219.
5. Cilburn, J.W. 1990. Concept maps to promote meaningful learning. Journal of College Science Teaching 19:212-217.
6. De Charon, A., J. Albright, C. Herren, A.H. Cline and J.T. Repa. 2009. Online tools help get scientists and educators on the same page. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 90(34):289, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1029/2009EO340002.
7. Lawrence Hall of Science. 2008. Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences: 'Session 3: Teaching and Learning'. Regents of the University of California.
8. Leshner, A. 2007. Outreach training needed. Editorial. Science 315(5809):161, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1138712.
9. Likens, G.E. 2010. The role of science in decision making: Does evidence-based science drive environmental policy? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:e1, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1890/090132.
10. Lubchenco, J. 1998. Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science 279:491-497, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.279.5350.491.
11. Mahler, S., R. Hoz, D. Fischl, E. Tov-Ly, and O. Lernau. 1991. Didactic use of concept mapping in higher education: Applications in medical education. Instructional Science 20:25-47, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00119685.
12. Markow, P.G., and R.A. Lonning. 1998. Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: Students' perceptions and effects on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(9):1015-1029, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199811)35:93.0.CO;2-G.
13. McClure, J.R., B. Sonak, and H.K. Suen. 1999. Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(4):475-492, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199904)36:4475::AID-TEA53.0.CO;2-O.
14. National Geographic Society. 2005. Ocean Literacy: The Essential Principles of Ocean Sciences Grades K-12. Brochure. Available online at: http://www.coexploration.org/oceanliteracy/ documents/OceanLitChart.pdf.
15. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2006. Investing in America's Future, Strategic Plan FY 2006- 2011. Available online at: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2006/nsf0648/NSF-06-48.pdf.
16. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2008. Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Science Grades K-12. Brochure. Available online at: http://cpo.noaa.gov/sites/cpo/Outreach&Education/pdf/ClimateLiteracyPoster-8_5x11_Final4-11.pdf.
17. National Research Council. 2006. Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 332 pp.
18. Nisbet, M.C., and D.A. Scheufele, 2009. What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany 96(10):1767-1778, http:// dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041.
19. Novak, J.D., and D.B. Gowin. 1984. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 199 pp.
20. Novak, J.D. 1990. Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27(10):937-949, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271003.
21. Novak, J.D., and A.J. Cañas. 2008. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Tem. Technical Report. IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
22. Rebich, S., and C. Gautier. 2005. Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education 53(4):355-365.
23. Roth, W.M., and A. Roychoudhury. 1993. The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(5):503-534, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300508.
24. Schneps, M.H., and P.M. Sadler. 1988. A Private Universe. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA.