National survey of supervision of midwives: Time for reflection?

British Journal of Midwifery

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 356-363

  Rogers, Cathy ^a   Yearley, Carole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877130222     PISSN: 09694900     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.5.356     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Ball JA, Washbrook M (1996) Birthrate plus-Midwifery service: A framework for workforce planning and decision-making for midwifery services. Books for Midwives Press, Cheshire
2. Burden B, Jones, T (1999) Midwives perceptions of supervisors and managers. British Journal of Midwifery 7(9): 547-52
3. Care Quality Commission (2011) Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust: Investigation report October 2011. Care Quality Commission, London
4. Care Quality Commission (2012) Investigation Report: University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust. tinyurl.com/d3xl648 (accessed 5 April 2013)
5. Cowell B, Wainwright D (1981) Behind the blue door: History of the Royal College of Midwives 1881-1981. Baillière Tindall, London
6. Department of Health (2007a) Maternity Matters: Choice, Access and Continuity of Care in a Safe Service. The Stationery Office, London
7. Department of Health (2007b) Making it Better: For Mother and Baby. The Stationery Office, London
8. Department of Health (2010a) Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. The Stationery Office, London
9. Department of Health (2010b) Midwifery 2020: Delivering expectations. The Stationery Office, London
10. Donnison J (1977) Midwives and Medical Men. Heinemann, London
11. Flint C (1993) Midwives Journal. Big sister is watching you. Nursing Times 89(46): 66-7
12. Francis R (2013) Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. The Stationery Office, London
13. Hawkins J (2002) Supervision is worth celebrating. The Practising Midwife 5(2): 4-5
14. Isherwood K (1988) Midwives Journal. Friend or watchdog? Nursing Times 84(24): 65
15. Kirby J (2012) Personal Communication. East of England Local Supervising Authority Supervisor of Midwives Forum
16. Local Supervisory Authority (2005) Statutory Supervision of Midwives: National Standard for England. LSA, London
17. Mead M, Kirby J (2006) An evaluation of time spent by midwives on supervision activities. British Journal of Midwifery 14(2): 76-81
18. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standards for the preparation and practice of supervisors of midwives. NMC, London
19. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2007) Report to Council on the analysis of the 2005-2006 LSA Annual Reports to the NMC. NMC, London
20. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008) Report to Council on the analysis of the 2006-2007 LSA Annual Reports to the NMC. NMC, London:
21. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2009a) Supervision, Support and Safety: Analysis of the 2007-2008 LSA reports to the NMC. NMC, London
22. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2009b) Modern Supervision in Action. A practical guide for midwives. NMC, London
23. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2010a) Supervision, Support and Safety: Analysis of the 2008-2009 LSA reports to the NMC. NMC, London
24. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2010b) Raising and escalating concerns: Guidance for nurses and midwives. NMC, London
25. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2010c) Midwives Rules and Standards 2010. NMC, London
26. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2011a) Supervision, support and safety: Analysis of the 2009-2010 LSA annual reports to the NMC. NMC, London
27. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2011b) Review of University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust. tinyurl.com/bw99qlb (accessed 5 April 2013)
28. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2012a) Midwives rules and standards 2012. NMC, London
29. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2012b) Supervision, support and safety: NMC quality assurance of the LSAs 2010-2011. NMC, London
30. Osbourne, A (2007) Supervision: the changing world of midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery 15(9): 552-5
31. Stapleton H, Duerden J, Kirkham M (1998) Evaluation of the impact of the supervision of midwives on professional practice and the quality of midwifery care. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, London
32. Stapleton H, Kirkham M (2000). Supervision of midwives: England 1996-7. In: Kirkham M (ed.) Recent Developments in the Supervision of midwives. Books for Midwives, Bath: 62-92
33. Thomas M, Mayes G (1996) The ENB Perspective: Preparation of SoMs for their Role. In: Kirkham M (ed.) Recent Developments in the Supervision of midwives. Books for Midwives, Bath: 58-70
34. United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing and Midwifery (1994) A Midwife's Code of Practice. UKCC, London United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing and
35. Midwifery (1995) Annual Statistics for the Year 1 April 1994 to 31 March 1995. UKCC, London
36. Winship J (1996) The UKCC Perspective: The Statutory Basis for the Supervision of Midwives Today. In: Kirkham M (ed.) Recent Developments in the Supervision of midwives. Books for Midwives, Bath: