A policy for enhancing the disclosure of university faculty invention

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 341-347

  Panagopoulos, Andreas ^a   Carayannis, Elias G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bargaining; Technology licensing; University patenting

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

BARGAINING; FULL DISCLOSURES; TECHNOLOGY LICENSING; TECHNOLOGY LICENSING OFFICES; UNIVERSITY PATENTING;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84877079809     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-011-9244-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for 'lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
2. Binmore, K. (1992). Fun and games. Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company.
3. Hayter, C. (2011). In search of the profit-maximizing actor: Motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 340-352.
4. Jensen, R., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2003). The disclosure and licensing of university inventions: The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1271-1300.
5. Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Royalty sharing and technology transfer in universities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 252-264.
6. Link, A., & Scott, J. (2008). Private investor participation and commercialization rates for government-sponsored research and development: Would a prediction market improve the performance of the SBIR program? Economica, 76, 264-281.
7. Link, A., & Siegel, D. (2005). Generating science based growth: An econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer. European Journal of Finance, 11, 169-182.
8. Link, A., Siegel, D., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641-655.
9. Markman, G., Balkin, D., Phan, P., & Gianiodis, P. (2005a). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 241-263.
10. Markman, G., Gianiodis, P., & Phan, P. (2006). An agency theoretic study of the relationship between knowledge agents and university technology transfer offices. Rensselaer Polytechnic working paper, Troy, NY.
11. Markman, G., Gianiodis, P., Phan, P., & Balkin, D. (2004). Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: Do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 353-364.
12. Markman, G., Gianiodis, P., Phan, P., & Balkin, D. (2005b). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Research Policy, 34, 1058-1075.
13. Markman, G., Panagopoulos, A., & Gianiodis, P. (2007). Scientists or entrepreneurs: Rent (mis)appropriation from discoveries made in university labs. In: Best paper proceedings of the American Academy of management.
14. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., & Link, A. (2003a). Commercial knowledge transfer from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 111-133.
15. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., & Link, A. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142.
16. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003b). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
17. Thursby, J., Jensen, J., & Thursby, M. (2001). Objectives characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U. S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59-72.
18. Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2004). Are faculty critical? Their role in university licensing. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22, 162-178.