Internet Protocol Packet Delay Variation measurements in communication networks: How to evaluate measurement uncertainty?

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 2099-2109

  Angrisani, Leopoldo ^a   Capriglione, Domenico ^b   Ferrigno, Luigi ^b   Miele, Gianfranco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASSINO AND SOUTHERN LAZIO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Communication networks test and measurement; GUM; Internet Protocol Packet Delay Variation; Measurement uncertainty; Quality of service measurement

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; COMPLIANCE CONTROL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; INTERNET TELEPHONY; MEASUREMENTS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; QUALITY OF SERVICE; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TESTING;

GUM; INTERNET PROTOCOL PACKETS; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; SERVICE MEASUREMENTS; TEST AND MEASUREMENT;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84877078201     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. L. Angrisani, and C. Narduzzi Testing communication and computer networks: an overview IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine 11 5 2008 12 24 10.1109/MIM.2008.4630738
2. ITU-T, Recommendation G.114 One-way Transmission Time (May 2003).
3. ITU-T, Recommendation Y.1541 Network Performance Objectives for IP-Based Services (December 2011).
4. ITU-T, Recommendation G.107 The E-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning (December 2011).
5. C.F. Coombs, and C.A. Coombs Communications Network Test & Measurement 1998 McGraw-Hill New York City, NY, USA
6. O. Kyas Network Troubleshooting 2001 Agilent Technologies Publication Santa Clara, CA, USA
7. G. Giorgi, and C. Narduzzi Detection of anomalous behaviors in networks from traffic measurements IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 57 12 2008 2782 2791 10.1109/TIM.2008.926046
8. A. Botta, A. Pescapé, and G. Ventre An approach to the identification of network elements composing heterogeneous end-to-end paths Computer Network 52 15 2008 2975 2987
9. L. Benetazzo, G. Giorgi, and C. Narduzzi On the analysis of communication and computer networks by traffic flow measurements IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 56 4 2007 1157 1164 10.1109/TIM.2007.900131 (Pubitemid 47249876)
10. P. Arlos, On the quality of computer network measurements, Ph.D. thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden, 2005.
11. V. Paxson, Strategies for sound internet measurement, in: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, IMC '04, 2004, pp. 263-271. (Pubitemid 40372053)
12. JCGM, Guide 100 Evaluation of measurement data - guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (2008).
13. F. Attivissimo, A. Cataldo, L. Fabbiano, and N. Giaquinto Systematic errors and measurement uncertainty: an experimental approach Measurement 44 9 2011 1781 1789 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.011
14. JCGM, 200 International Vocabulary of Metrology - basic and general concepts and associated terms (2012).
15. T. Nguyen, M. Sadiku, Jitter analysis and simulation of constant bit rate atm multiplexers, in: Proceedings of IEEE SoutheastCon 2001, 2001, pp. 44-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2001.923085. (Pubitemid 32478212)
16. L. Angrisani, G. Ventre, L. Peluso, and A. Tedesco Measurement of processing and queuing delays introduced by an open-source router in a single-hop network IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 55 4 2006 1065 1076 10.1109/TIM.2006.876542 (Pubitemid 44111358)
17. C. Demichelis, P. Chimento, IP packet delay variation metric for IP performance metrics (IPPM), RFC 3393 (November 2002).
18. A. Morton, B. Claise, Packet delay variation applicability statement, RFC 5481 (March 2009).
19. L. Angrisani, D. Capriglione, L. Ferrigno, G. Miele, Packet jitter measurement in communication networks: a sensitivity analysis, in: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements and Networking, 2011, pp. 146-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2011.6088488.
20. G. Betta, D. Capriglione, L. Ferrigno, M. Laracca, Experimental performance analysis of power line telecommunication modem for indoor applications, in: Proceedings of IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology, 2007, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/IMTC.2007.379453.
21. G. Betta, D. Capriglione, L. Ferrigno, and M. Laracca A measurement-driven approach to assess power line telecommunication (PLT) network quality of service (QoS) performance parameters Measurement Science and Technology 20 10 2009 105101
22. L. Angrisani, E. Atteo, D. Capriglione, L. Ferrigno, G. Miele, An efficient experimental approach for the uncertainty estimation of QoS parameters in communication networks, in: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2010, pp. 1186-1191. doi:10.1109/IMTC.2010.5488077.
23. L. Angrisani, D. Capriglione, L. Ferrigno, G. Miele, Type A uncertainty in jitter measurements in communication networks, in: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2011, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/IMTC.2011.5944205.
24. L. Angrisani, D. Capriglione, L. Ferrigno, and G. Miele A methodological approach for estimating protocol analyzer instrumental measurement uncertainty in packet jitter evaluation IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 61 5 2012 1405 1416 10.1109/TIM.2012.2186478
25. V. Jacobson, K. Nichols, K. Poduri, An expedited forwarding PHB, RFC 2598 (June 1999).
26. ITU-T, Recommendation G.810 Definitions and terminology for synchronization networks (August 1996).
27. European co-operation for Accredition, EA-4/02 Expression of the measurement of Uncertainty in Calibration (December 1999).
28. G. Betta, C. Liguori, and A. Pietrosanto llStructured approach to estimate the measurement uncertainty in digital signal elaboration algorithms IEE Proceedings of Science, Measurement and Technology 146 1 1999 21 26 10.1049/ip-smt:19990001
29. A. Botta, A. Dainotti, and A. Pescapé A tool for the generation of realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios Computer Networks 56 15 2012 3531 3547 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.02.019