HMMs, GRs, and n-grams as lexical substitution techniques - are they portable to other languages?

International Workshop on Natural Language Processing Methods and Corpora in Translation, Lexicography, and Language Learning, held in conjunction with the International Conference RANLP 2009 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 21-27

  Preiss, Judita ^a   Coonce, Andrew ^a   Baker, Brittany ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Czech; Forward Backward algorithm; Google n gram corpus; grammatical relations; HMMs; Lexical substitution; Lucene; synonyms; word sense disambiguation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

CZECH; FORWARD / BACKWARD ALGORITHMS; GOOGLE N-GRAM CORPUS; GOOGLE+; GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS; HMM; LEXICAL SUBSTITUTION; LUCENE; N-GRAMS; SYNONYM; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84877076668     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. [Brants and Franz, 2006] Brants, T. and Franz, A. (2006). Web 1T 5-gram Version 1.
2. [Briscoe et al., 2002] Briscoe, E. J., Carroll, J., Graham, J., and Copestake, A. (2002). Relational evaluation schemes. In Proceedings of the beyond PARSEVAL Workshop at the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 4-8.
3. [Briscoe et al., 2006] Briscoe, E. J., Carroll, J., and Watson, R. (2006). The second release of the RASP system. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006, Interactive Poster Session.
4. [Dagan et al., 2006] Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Gliozzo, A., Marmorshtein, E., and Strapparava, C. (2006). Direct word sense matching for lexical substitution. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 449-456.
5. [Elworthy, 1994] Elworthy, D. (1994). Does Baum-Welch re-estimation help taggers? In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Applied NLP, pages 53-58.
6. [Graff, 2003] Graff, D. (2003). English gigaword. Technical report, Linguistic Data Consortium.
7. [Hajičová, 1998] Hajičová, E. (1998). Prague dependency treebank: From analytic to tectogrammatical annotations. In Proceedings of 2nd TST, pages 45-50.
8. [Hassan et al., 2007] Hassan, S., Csomai, A., Banea, C., and Mihalcea, R. (2007). UNT: SubFinder: combining knowledge sources for automatic lexical substitution. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on the Semantic Evaluations.
9. [McCarthy, 2002] McCarthy, D. (2002). Lexical substitution as a task for WSD evaluation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Word Sense Disambiguation: Recent Successes and Future Directions, pages 109-115.
10. [McCarthy and Navigli, 2007] McCarthy, D. and Navigli, R. (2007). Task 10: English lexical substitution task. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, pages 48-53.
11. [Miller et al., 1990] Miller, G., Beckwith, R., Felbaum, C., Gross, D., and Miller, K. (1990). Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. Journal of Lexicography, 3(4):235-244.
12. [Pereira et al., 1993] Pereira, F., Tishby, F., and Lee, L. (1993). Distributional clustering of English words. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 183-190.
13. [Preiss and Yarowsky, 2002] Preiss, J. and Yarowsky, D., editors (2002). Proceedings of SENSEVAL-2: Second International Workshop on Evaluating Word Sense Disambiguating Systems.
14. [Roark and Sproat, 2007] Roark, B. and Sproat, R. W. (2007). Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford University Press.
15. [Sinha et al., 2009] Sinha, R., McCarthy, D., and Mihalcea, R. (2009). Semeval-2010 task 2: Cross-lingual lexical substitution. In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2009 Workshop: SEW-2009-Semantic Evaluations.
16. [Yuret, 2007] Yuret, D. (2007). KU: Word sense disambiguation by substitution. In Workshop of Se-mEval.