Trade liberalisation between asymmetric countries with environmentally concerned consumers

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 549-560

  Gori, Giuseppe Francesco ^a   Lambertini, Luca ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis   (Italy)

Author keywords

Environmental externality; Geographical nation size; International trade; Spatial competition

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); FREE TRADE; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; TRADE LIBERALIZATION;

EID: 84877073339     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Antweiler W., Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Is free trade good for the environment?. American Economic Review 2001, 91(4):877-908.
2. Bagwell K., Staiger R.W. Domestic policies, national sovereignty, and international economic institutions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2001, 116(2):519-562.
3. Bansal S., Gangopadhyay S. Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45(2, Supplement):333-355.
4. Brander J.A., Taylor M.S. International trade and open-access renewable resources: the small open economy case. Canadian Journal of Economics 1997, 30(3):526-552.
5. Chichilnisky G. North-south trade and the global environment. American Economic Review 1994, 84(4):851-874.
6. Chirco A., Lambertini L., Zagonari F. How demand affects optimal prices and product differentiation. Papers in Regional Science 2003, 82:555-568.
7. Clemenz G. Eco-labeling and horizontal product differentiation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 45:481-497.
8. Conrad K. Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 31(1):1-19.
9. Copeland B.R. Palgrave Handbook of International Trade. Trade and the Environment 2011, 423-496. Palgrave MacMillan, Ch.
10. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. North-south trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1994, 109(3):755-787.
11. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Trade, spatial separation, and the environment. Journal of International Economics 1999, 47(1):137-168.
12. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence 2003, Princeton University Press.
13. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature 2004, 42(1):7-71.
14. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Free trade and global warming: a trade theory view of the kyoto protocol. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2005, 49(2):205-234.
15. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Trade, tragedy, and the commons. American Economic Review 2009, 99(3):725-749.
16. D'Aspremont C., Gabszewicz J.J., Thisse J.-F. On hotelling's "stability in competition". Econometrica 1979, 47(5):1145-1150.
17. Ederington J., Levinson A., Minier J. Trade liberalization and pollution havens. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 2004, 0(2):6.
18. Egger H., Egger P. Outsourcing and trade in a spatial world. Journal of Urban Economics 2007, 62:441-470.
19. Egger H., Egger P. The trade and welfare effects of mergers in space. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2010, 40(4):210-220.
20. Eriksson C. Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? A differentiated-products example. Resource and Energy Economics 2004, 26(3):281-293.
21. Espinola-Arredondo A., Zhao H. Environmental policy in a linear city model of product differentiation. Environment and Development Economics 2012, 17(4):461-477.
22. Fischer C., Fox A.K. Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: border tax adjustments versus rebates. RFF Discussion paper 2009.
23. Frankel J., Rose A. Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2005, 87(1):85-91.
24. Friedman J.W. A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies 1971, 38(113):1-12.
25. Fujiwara K. Why environmentalists resist trade liberalization. Environmental and Resource Economics 2009, 44(1):71-84.
26. Gros D. Global welfare implications of carbon border taxes. CESifo Working Paper 2009, 2790.
27. Haupt A. Environmental policy in open economies and monopolistic competition. Environmental and Resource Economics 2006, 33:143-167.
28. Holland S.P. Taxes and trading versus intensity standards: second-best environmental policies with incomplete regulation (leakage) or market power. NBER Working Paper 2009, 15262.
29. Keen M., Kotsogiannis C. Coordinating climate and trade policies: Pareto efficiency and the role of border tax adjustments. Exeter University, Department of Economics Working Paper 2011, 1106.
30. Lambertini L. Trade liberalization may be harmful under endogenous differentiation. Osaka City University Economic Review 1997, 33(1):237-254.
31. Lambertini L. Unicity of the equilibrium in the unconstrained hotelling model. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1997, 27(6):785-798.
32. McAusland C. Trade, politics, and the environment: tailpipe vs. smokestack. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2008, 55(1):52-71.
33. Milanovic B. Global Inequality: from class to location, from proletarians to migrants. The World Bank Policy Research WP 2011, 5820.
34. Moraga-González J.L., Padrón-Fumero N. Environmental policy in a green market. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, 22:419-447.
35. Neary J. International trade and the environment: theoretical and policy linkages. Environmental and Resource Economics 2006, 33(1):95-118.
36. Rodríguez-Ibeas R. Environmental product differentiation and environmental awareness. Environmental and Resource Economics 2007, 36(2):237-254.
37. Shachmurove Y., Spiegel U. On nations size and transportation costs. Review of International Economics 1995, 3(2):235-243.
38. Tabuchi T., Thisse J.-F. Asymmetric equilibria in spatial competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization 1995, 13(2):213-227.
39. Taylor M. Buffalo hunt: international trade and the virtual extinction of the North American bison. American Economic Review 2011, 101(7):3162-3195.
40. Tharakan J., Thisse J.-F. The importance of being small. Or when countries are areas and not points. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2002, 32(3):381-408.
41. Yakita A., Yamauchi H. Environmental awareness and environmental R&D spillovers in differentiated duopoly. Research in Economics 2011, 65(3):137-143.
42. Zeng D.-Z., Zhao L. Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 58(2):141-153.