Effect of shear rate on the response of microbial fuel cell toxicity sensor to Cu(II)

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 136, Issue , 2013, Pages 707-710

  Shen, Yujia ^a   Wang, Meng ^a   Chang, In Seop ^b   Ng, How Yong ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biosensor; Cu(II); EPS; Microbial fuel cell; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

BIOFILMS; BIOSENSORS; FLOW RATE; NITROGEN; SHEAR DEFORMATION; TOXICITY;

ANODIC BIOFILMS; BIOFILM STRUCTURE; BIOMASS DENSITY; BIOMONITORING; EPS; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; HIGH POROSITY; QUICK RESPONSE;

MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS;

CUPRIC ION; NITROGEN; OFEXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCE; POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOFILM; BIOFUEL; BIOMONITORING; COPPER; FUEL CELL; MIXING; NITROGEN; POROSITY; SENSOR; TOXICITY; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; BIOFILM; BIOMASS; CYTOTOXICITY; DENSITY; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; FLOW RATE; MICROBIAL FUEL CELL; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSOR; SHEAR RATE; WASTE WATER;

EID: 84877050223     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.069     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altas L. Inhibitory effect of heavy metals on methane-producing anaerobic granular sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 162(2-3):1551-1556.
2. APHA, 2005. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21th ed., Washington, DC.
3. Celmer D., Oleszkiewicz J.A., Cicek N. Impact of shear force on the biofilm structure and performance of a membrane biofilm reactor for tertiary hydrogen-driven denitrification of municipal wastewater. Water Research 2008, 42(12):3057-3065.
4. Coufort C., Derlon N., Ochoa-Chaves J., Line A., Paul E. Cohesion and detachment in biofilm systems for different electron acceptor and donors. Water Science and Technology 2007, 55(8-9):421-428.
5. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 1956, 28(3):350-356.
6. Fang H.H.P., Xu L.C., Chan K.Y. Effects of toxic metals and chemicals on biofilm and biocorrosion. Water Research 2002, 36(19):4709-4716.
7. Frolund B., Griebe T., Nielsen P.H. Enzymatic-activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1995, 43(4):755-761.
8. Henriques I.D.S., Love N.G. The role of extracellular polymeric substances in the toxicity response of activated sludge bacteria to chemical toxins. Water Research 2007, 41(18):4177-4185.
9. Hu Z.Q., Jin J., Abruna H.D., Houston P.L., Hay A.G., Ghiorse W.C., Shuler M.L., Hidalgo G., Lion L.W. Spatial distributions of copper in microbial biofilms by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Environmental Science and Technology 2007, 41(3):936-941.
10. Kim M., Hyun M.S., Gadd G.M., Kim H.J. A novel biomonitoring system using microbial fuel cells. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2007, 9(12):1323-1328.
11. Kwok W.K., Picioreanu C., Ong S.L., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Ng W.J., Heijnen J.J. Influence of biomass production and detachment forces on biofilm structures in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1998, 58(4):400-407.
12. Liu H., Logan B. Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell (MFC) in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environmental Science and Technology 2004, 38(14):4040-4046.
13. Liu Y., Tay J.H. The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Water Research 2002, 36(7):1653-1665.
14. Lovley D.R. The microbe electric: conversion of organic matter to electricity. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2008, 19(6):564-571.
15. Marcus A.K., Torres C.I., Rittmann B.E. Conduction-based modeling of the biofilm anode of a microbial fuel cell. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2007, 98(6):1171-1182.
16. Patil S., Harnisch F., Schroder U. Toxicity response of electroactive microbial biofilms - a decisive feature for potential biosensor and power source applications. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11(13):2834-2837.
17. Pham H.T., Boon N., Aelterman P., Clauwaert P., De Schamphelaire L., van Oostveldt P., Verbeken K., Rabaey K., Verstraete W. High shear enrichment improves the performance of the anodophilic microbial consortium in a microbial fuel cell. Microbial Biotechnology 2008, 1(6):487-496.
18. Rochex A., Godon J.J., Bernet N., Escudie R. Role of shear stress on composition, diversity and dynamics of biofilm bacterial communities. Water Research 2008, 42(20):4915-4922.
19. Stoodley P., Cargo R., Rupp C.J., Wilson S., Klapper I. Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2002, 29(6):361-367.
20. Xing D.F., Cheng S.A., Logan B.E., Regan J.M. Isolation of the exoelectrogenic denitrifying bacterium Comamonas denitrificans based on dilution to extinction. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010, 85(5):1575-1587.