A new user-friendly visual environment for breast MRI data analysis

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 411-423

  Antonios, Danelakis ^a   Dimitrios, Verganelakis A ^b   Theoharis, Theoharis ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b Medical Diagnostic Center Encephalos Euromedica   (Greece)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

CAD; CDSS; Data analysis; Kinetics; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography

Indexed keywords

BREAST MRI; CDSS; COLOR MAP; CONTRAST MEDIUM; MRI IMAGE; USER FRIENDLY; VISUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA REDUCTION; ENZYME KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BENIGN TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WORKLOAD;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84877034941     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Fyssas J.P. Breast and Pathologies: A Manual for Every Woman 2006, Livanis, Athens.
2. Karellas A., Vedantham S. Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. Medical Physics 2008, 35(11):4878-4897.
3. Morris E.A., Liberman L. Breast MRI: Diagnosis and Intervention 2005, Springer, USA. first ed.
4. Mann R., Kuhl C., Kinkel K., Boetes M. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European society of breast imaging. European Radiology 2008, 18:1307-1318.
5. Friedrich M. MRI of the breast: state of the art. European Journal of Radiology 1998, 8:707-725.
6. Warner E., Plewes D.B., Hill K.A., Causer P.A., Zubovits J.T., Jong R.A., et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography and clinical breast examination. Journal of the American Medical Association 2004, 292:1317-1325.
7. Kuhl C.K., Schrading S., Leutner C.C., Morakkabati-Spitz N., Wardelmann E., Fimmers R., et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familiar risk for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005, 23:8469-8476.
8. Sardanelli F., Giuseppetti G.M., Panizza P., Bazzocchi M., Fausto A., Simonetti G., et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. American Journal of Roentgenology 2004, 183:1149-1157.
9. Yeh E., Slanetz P., Kopans D.B., Rafferty E., Georgian-Smith D., Moy L., et al. Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology 2005, 184:868-877.
10. Heywang S., Fenzl G., Hahn D., Krischke I., Edmaier M., Eiermann W., et al. MR imaging of the breast: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1986, 10:615-620.
11. Berg W., Gutierrez L., Nessaiver M., Carter W., Bhargavan M., Lewis R., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004, 233:830-849.
12. Bluemke D., Gatsonis C., Chen M., DeAngelis G., DeBruhl N., Harms S., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. Journal of the American Medical Association 2004, 292:2735-2742.
13. Heywang-Kobrunner S., Bick U., Bradley W., Bone B., Casselman J., Coulthard A., et al. International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. European Radiology 2001, 11:531-546.
14. Partain C., Kulkarni M., Price R., Fleischer A., Page D., Malcolm A., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: functional T1 and three-dimensional imaging. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 1986, 8:292-299.
15. Boetes C., Mus R., Holland R., Barentsz J., Strjik S., Wobbes T., et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995, 197:743-747.
16. Davis L.P., Staiger J.M., Harris K.B., Ganott M.A., Klementaviciene J., McCarty K.S., et al. Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1996, 37:1-9.
17. Elsamaloty H., Elzawawi M.S., Mohammad S., Herial N. Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI. American Journal of Roentgenology 2009, 192:1142-1148.
18. den Brink J.S.V., Watanabe Y., Kuhl C.K., Chung T., Muthupillai R., Cauteren M.V., et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. European Journal of Radiology 2003, 46:3-27.
19. Smith R.A. The evolving role of MRI in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2007, 13:1362-1364.
20. Bone B., Szabo B., Palko A., Aspelin P. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast diseases. Orvosi Hetilap 2001, 142:2123-2131.
21. der Velden A.P.S.V., Boetes C., Bult P., Wobbes T. Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component. BMC Medical Imaging 2009, 9:1-8.
22. Moy L., Elias K., Patel V., Lee J., Babb J.S., Toth H.K., et al. Is breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammography findings. American Journal of Roentgenology 2009, 193:986-993.
23. Fischer U., Kopka L., Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of pre-operative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999, 213:881-888.
24. Rieber A., Zeitler H.R., Gorich J., Kreienberg R., Brambs H., et al. MRI of breast cancer: influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity. British Journal of Radiology 1997, 70:452-458.
25. Shimauchi A., Jansen S.A., Abe H., Jaskowiak N., Schmidt R.A., Newstead G.M. Breast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false negative lesions. American Journal of Roentgenology 2009, 194:1674-1679.
26. Hansen S., Grabau D., Sorensen F., Bak M., Vach W., Rose C. Vascular grading of angiogenesis: prognostic significance in breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer 2000, 82:339-347.
27. Semple N.W.J., Welch W., Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine 1991, 324:1-8.
28. Kuhl C., Schild H. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2000, 12:965-974.
29. Kuhl C., Mielcarek P., Klaschik S., Leutner C., Wardelmann E., Gieseke J., et al. Are signal time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MR imaging. Radiology 1999, 211:101-110.
30. P.A.T. Baltzer, M. Dietzel, R. Zoubi, W.A. Kaiser, syngo Brevis Efficient and standardized workflow for breast MRI, Women's Clinical Health 2010 (MAGNETOM Flash:1-3).
31. Lehman C.D., Peacock S., DeMartini W.B., Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. American Journal of Roentgenology 2006, 187:51-56.
32. Heywang S., Wolf A., Pruss E., Hilbertz T., Eiermann W., Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989, 171:95-103.
33. Kaiser W., Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989, 170:681-686.
34. Heywang-Kobrunner S., Viehweg P., Heinig A., Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. European Journal of Radiology 1997, 24:94-108.
35. Schnall M., Blume J., Bluemke D., DeAngelis G., DeBruhl N., Harms S., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006, 238:42-53.
36. Pereira F.P.A., Martins G., Figueiredo E., Domingues M.N.A., Domingues R.C., et al. Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. American Journal of Roentgenology 2009, 193:1030-1035.
37. Tofts P.S., Brix G., Buckley D.L., Evelhoch J.L., Henderson E., Knopp M.V., et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusible dynamic MRI imaging: standardized quantities and symbols. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1999, 10:223-232.
38. American College of Radiology and National Electrical Manufacturers Association Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine 2009, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, USA. first ed.
39. Theoxaris T., Papaioannou G., Platis N., Patrikalakis N.M. Graphics and Visualization: Principles and Algorithms 2007, A.K. Peters, USA. first ed.
40. Berner E.S. Clinical Decision Support Systems: State of the Art 2009, AHRQ Publications, USA. first ed.
41. Kuperman G.J., Bobb A., Payne T.H., Avery A.J., Gandhi T.K., Burns G., et al. Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007, 14:29-40.
42. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001, 64:15-37.
43. Bates D., Kuperman G., Wang S., Gandhi T., Kittler A., Volk L., et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003, 10:523-530.
44. Valach J., Lehocki F. Clinical decision support systems. Proc. ESF'08 2008, 1-9.
45. Coiera E. Guide to Health Informatics 2005, Oxford University Press, UK, (Chapter 25). second ed.
46. Zheng K. Clinical Decision - Support Systems. Management, Types and Standards 2011, vol. 36. Auerbach Publications, USA, pp. 501-509.
47. Kawamoto K., Houlihan C.A., Balas A.E., Lobach D.F. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. British Medical Journal 2005, 330:765-772.
48. Kaushal R., Shojania K.G., Bate D.W. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003, 163:1409-1416.
49. Garg A.X., Adhikari N.K.J., McDonald H., Rosas-Arellano M.P., Devereaux P.J., Beyene J., et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005, 293:1223-1238.
50. Petrick N., Sahlner B., Chan H.P., Helvie M.A., Paquerault S., Hadjiiski L.M. Breast cancer detection: evaluation of a mass-detection algorithm for computer aided diagnosis - experience in 263 patients. Radiology 2002, 224:217-224.
51. Vyborny C.J., Doi T., Shaughnessy K.F.O., Romsdahl H.M., Schneider A.C., Stein A.A. Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer aided detection. Radiology 2000, 215:703-707.
52. Freer T.W., Ulissey M.J. Screening mammography with computer aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001, 220:781-786.
53. Matthhew G. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008, 190:854-859.
54. Brem R.F., Baum J., Lechner M., Kaplan S., Souders S., Naul L.G., et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. American Journal of Roentgenology 2003, 181:687-693.
55. Schmuecking M., Boltze C., Geyer H., Kloetzer K., Schilling B., Wendt T., et al. Dynamic MRI and CAD vs. choline MRS: where is the detection level for a lesion characterization in prostate cancer?. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009, 85:814-824.
56. Jansen S., Shimauchi A., Zak L., Fan X., Wood A., Karczmar G., et al. Kinetic curves of malignant lesions are not consistent across MRI systems: need for improved standardization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition. American Journal of Roentgenology 2009, 193:832-839.
57. Mussurakis S., Gibbs P., Horsman A. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium enhanced MR images. Radiology 1998, 206:465-473.
58. McRobbie D.W., Moore E.A., Graves M.J., Prince M.R. MRI from Picture to Proton 2003, Cambridge University Press, UK. first ed.
59. Beek J.E.V., Hoffman E.A. Functional imaging: CT and MRI. Clinics in Chest Medicine 2008, 29:195-225.
60. Chen W., Giger M.L., Bick U., Newstead G.M. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Medical Physics 2006, 33(8):2878-2888.
61. Williams T.C., DeMartini W.B., Partridge S.C., Peacock S., Lehman C.D. Breast MR imaging: computeraided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007, 244(1):94-103.
62. Bhooshan N., Giger M.L., Jansen S.A., Li H., Lan L., Newstead G.M. Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 2010, 254(3):680-690.