Toward a Science of Research Prioritization? the Use of Value of Information by Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Groups

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 460-462

  Fleurence, Rachael L ^a   Meltzer, David O ^b,c  

^a PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; NEOPLASM; RESEARCH; NOTE;

GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; NEOPLASMS; RESEARCH;

EID: 84877020364     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13486979     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Carlson JJ, Thariani R, Roth J, et al. Value-of-information analysis within a stakeholder-driven research prioritization process in a US setting: an application in cancer genomics. Med Decis Making. 2013 ; 33 (4). 463-471
2. PCORI Methodology Committee. Draft Methodology Report: Our Questions, Our Decisions: Standards for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. Public comment draft report of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee presented on 23 July 2012, and revised thereafter, 2012. Available at: http://pcori.org/assets/MethodologyReport-Comment.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2013.
3. MyersESandersGDRaviD. Evaluating the potential use of modeling and value-of-information analysis for future research prioritization within the evidence-based practice center program. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011 (Methods Future Research Needs Reports, No. 5). Available from: URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK62134/
4. Griffin S, Welton NJ, Claxton K. Exploring the research decision space: the expected value of information for sequential research designs. Med Decis Making. 2010 ; 30: 155-162
5. Meltzer DO, Hoomans T, Chung JW, Basu A. Minimal modeling approaches to value of information analysis for health research. Med Decis Making. 2011 ; 31 (6). E1 - E22
6. Fleurence R, Selby JV, Odom-Walker K, et al. How the patient-centered outcomes research institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 ; 32 (2). 393-400
7. ClaxtonKGriffinSKoffijbergHMcKennaC. Expected health benefits of additional evidence: principles, methods and applications. Available at: URL: www.pcori.org/assets/Research-Methods-Workshop-Presentations.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2013.