Scoring the 5-level EQ-5D: Can latent utilities derived from a discrete choice model be transformed to health utilities derived from time tradeoff tasks?

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 567-578

  Pullenayegum, Eleanor ^a   Xie, Feng ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; health related quality of life (HRQOL); utility measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CANADA; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DECISION MAKING; EQ-5D; FEMALE; HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL); HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILITY MEASUREMENT;

EQ-5D; HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL); UTILITY MEASUREMENT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; CANADA; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84877015838     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13475718     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. the EuroQol group. Health Policy. 1990 ; 16: 199-208
2. Brauer CA, Rosen AB, Greenberg D, Neumann PJ. Trends in the measurement of health utilities in published cost-utility analyses. Value in Health. 2006 ; 9: 213-8
3. O'Reilly DJ, Xie F, Pullenayegum E, et al. Estimation of the impact of diabetes-related complications on health utilities for patients with type 2 diabetes in Ontario, Canada. Qual Life Res. 2011 ; 20 (6). 939-43
4. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 ; 20: 1727-36
5. Sculpher M, Bryan S, Fry P, de Winter P, Payne H, Emberton M. Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment. BMJ. 2004 ; 328: 382
6. Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2009 ; 18: 951-76
7. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, et al. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008 ; 6: 107-15
8. Lloyd A, Doyle S, Dewilde S, Turk F. Preferences and utilities for the symptoms of moderate to severe allergic asthma. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 ; 9: 275-84
9. Xie F, Pullenayegum EM, Gaebel K, Oppe M, Krabbe PFM. Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worse scaling?.. :
10. Stolk EA, Oppe M, Scalone L, Krabbe PF. Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2010 ; 13: 1005-13
11. Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ Transport Modelling. Hensher DA Button K, ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science ; 2007 :
12. van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012 ; 15: 708-15
13. Krabbe PFM, Devlin N, von Hout B, Stolk E. Report on the pilot studies set up to test a combination of TTO and DC methodology to value the EQ-5D-5L.. 2012 ;:
14. Robinson A, Spencer A. Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead. Health Econ. 2006 ; 15: 393-402
15. McFadden D Frontiers in Econometrics. Zarembka P, ed. New York: Academic Press ; 1974 :
16. Luce RD New York: John Wiley & Sons ; 1959 :
17. Luce RD, Suppes P Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. Luce RD Bush RR Galanter E, ed. New York: Wiley ; 1965 :
18. Breslow NE, Clayton DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993 ; 88: 9-25
19. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974 ; 19: 716-23
20. Cleveland WS, Grosse E, Shyu WM Statistical Models in S. Chambers JM Hastie TJ, ed. New York: Chapman & Hall ; 1992 :
21. Reinsch CH. Smoothing by spline functions. Numerische Matematik. 1967 ; 10: 177-83
22. Wahba G Philadelphia: SIAM ; 1990 :