The microgrid: A scientific tool for modeling computational grids

Proceedings of the International Conference on Supercomputing

Volumn 2000-November, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Song, H J ^a   Liu, X ^a   Jakobsen, D ^a   Bhagwan, R ^a   Zhang, X ^a   Taura, K ^b   Chien, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; MIDDLEWARE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COMPUTATIONAL GRIDS; DYNAMIC GRID; DYNAMIC NATURE; GRID RESOURCE; GRID SOFTWARES; MICROGRID; SCIENTIFIC TOOL; SOFTWARE RESOURCES; SYSTEMATIC EXPLORATION; VIRTUAL GRIDS;

GRID COMPUTING;

EID: 84877012743     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SC.2000.10028     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Gabrielle Allen, Tom Goodale, Gerd Lanfermann, Thomas Radke, and Edward Seidel. The cactus code, a problem solving environment for the grid. 2000.
2. Sandeep Bajaj, Lee Breslau, Deborah Estrin, Kevin Fall, Sally Floyd, Padma Haldar, Mark Handley, Ahmed Helmy, John Heidemann, Polly Huang, Satish Kumar, Steven McCanne, Reza Rejaie, Puneet Sharma, Kannan Varadhan, Ya Xu, Haobo Yu,, and Daniel Zappala. Improving simulation for network research. Technical Report 99-702, University of Southern California, 1999. http://netweb.usc.edu/vint/.
3. James Cowie, Hongbo Liu, Jason Liu, David Nicol, and Andy Ogielski. Towards realistic million-node internet simulations. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA'99), 1999. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/∼jasonliu/projects/ssf/.
4. Gary Tyson Edward Tam, Jude Rivers and Edward S. Davidson. mlcache: A flexible multi-lateral cache simulator. Technical Report CSE-TR-363-98, University of Michigan Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 98.
5. Mingdong Feng and Charles E. Leiserson. Efficient detection of determinacy races in cilk programs. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA), pages 1-11, 1997.
6. Ian Foster and Carl Kesselman. Globus: A metacomputing infrastructure toolkit. International Journal of Supercomputing Applications, 1997. http://www.globus.org.
7. A. S. Grimshaw, W. A. Wulf, and the Legion team. The Legion vision of a worldwide virtual computer. Communications of the ACM, 1997. http://legion.virginia.edu.
8. Chih han Lin, Hao hua Chu, and Klara Nahrstedt. A soft real-time scheduling server on the windows nt. In Proceedings of the Second USENIX Windows NT Symposium, 1998.
9. David M. Nicol James Cowie and Andy T. Ogielski. Modeling the global internet. Computing in Science & Engineering, 1(1):42-50, 1999. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/∼jasonliu/projects/ssf/.
10. Lawrence Snyder Kevin Bolding, Melanie Fulgham. The case for chaotic adaptive routing. Technical Report UW-CSE-94-02-04, University of Washington, 1994.
11. Jae Hoon. Kim and Andrew. Chien. Network performance under bimodal traffic loads. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 28(1), 1995.
12. Lam/mpi parallel computing. Home Page, at http://mpi.nd.edu/lam/.
13. Nancy Miller and Peter Steenkiste. Collecting network status information for network-aware applications. In Infocom'00, 2000. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/cmcl/www/remulac/index.html.
14. Vijay S. Pai, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, and Sarita V. Adve. RSIM: An Execution-Driven Simulator for ILP-Based Shared-Memory Multiprocessors and Uniprocessors. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computer Architecture Education, February 1997. http://www.ece.rice.edu/∼rsim/.
15. Sundeep Prakash. Performance Prediction of Parallel Programs. PhD thesis, University of California Los Angels, 1996. http://pcl.cs.ucla.edu/projects/sesame/.
16. Steven K. Reinhardt, Mark D. Hill, James R. Larus, Alvin R. Lebeck, James C. Lewis, and David A. Wood. The wisconsin wind tunnel: Virtual prototyping of parallel computers. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM Sigmetrics Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pages 48-60, 1993. http://www.cs.wisc.edu/∼wwt/.
17. Randy L. Ribler, Jeffrey S. Vetter, Huseyin Simitci,, and Daniel A. Reed. Autopilot: Adaptive control of distributed applications. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Symposium on High-Performance Distributed Computing, 1998. http://wwwpablo.cs.uiuc.edu/Project/Autopilot/AutopilotOverview.htm.
18. Mendel Rosenblum, Stephen A. Herrod, Emmett Witchel,, and Anoop Gupta. Complete computer simulation: The simos approach. IEEE Parallel and Distributed Technology, 1995. http://simos.stanford.edu/.
19. William Saphir, Rob Van der Wijngaart, Alex Woo, and Maurice Yarrow. New implementation and results for the nas parallel benchmarks 2. NASA Ames Research Center. http://www.nas.nasa.gov/Software/NPB/.
20. Atsuko Takefusa, Satoshi Matsuoka, Hidemoto Nakada, Kento Aida, and Umpei Nagashima. Overview of a performance evaluation system for global computing scheduling algorithms. In Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC8), pages 97-104, 1999. http://ninf.etl.go.jp/.
21. The United States National Science Foundations vBNS. Very high performance backbone network service. MCI WorldCom, Inc. http://www.vnbs.net/.
22. Rich Wolski. Dynamically forecasting network performance using the network weather service. Journal of Cluster Computing, 1998. http://nws.npaci.edu/NWS/.