Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects

Engineering Failure Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue , 2013, Pages 209-219

  Ma, Bin ^a   Shuai, Jian ^a   Liu, Dexu ^b   Xu, Kui ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

^b Zhongyuan Petroleum Prospecting and Design Institute   (China)

Author keywords

Failure Pressure; Finite element analysis; Full scale burst test; High strength steel; Pipeline

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; BURST TESTS; DEFECT-FREE PIPES; ENGINEERING DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL DATUM; FAILURE PRESSURE; INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT; OIL AND GAS TRANSMISSION;

CORROSION RATE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HIGH PRESSURE PIPELINES; OFFSHORE PIPELINES; PIPELINES; STRAIN HARDENING; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

HIGH STRENGTH STEEL;

EID: 84877006691     PISSN: 13506307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Zhuang Chuan-jing, Feng Yao-rong. The development and its future research direction of grade X80 pipeline steel in China. In: International technology conference of X80 grade steel pipeline. Beijing; 2004. p. 22-32.
2. TSO LiangTeng, Peng-Hsiang Chang. A study of residual stresses in multi-pass girth-butt welded pipes. Int J Ves Pip 1997;74:59-70.
3. Zhu Xian-Kui, Leis Brian N. Average shear stress yield criterion and its application to plastic collapse analysis of pipelines. Int J Press Vessels Pip 2006, 83:663-671.
4. Bin Ma, Jian Shuai Analysis on the latest assessment criteria of ASME B31G-2009 for the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. J Fail Anal Preven 2011, (11):666-671.
5. Choia J.B., Goo B.K. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines. Int J Press Vessels Pip 2003, 80:121-128.
6. Zhu Xian-Kui, Leis Brian N. Strength criteria and analytic predictions of failure pressure in line pipes. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 2004, 14(2):125-131.
7. Shuai Jian, Zhang Chun'e, Chen Fu-lai Prediction of failure pressure in corroded pipelines based on non-linear finite element analysis. Acta Petrolei Sinica 2008, 29(6):933-937.
8. Adib-Ramezani H., Jeong J., Pluvinage G. Structural integrity evaluation of X52 gas pipes subjected to external corrosion defects using the SINTAP procedure. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2006, 83:420-432.
9. ANSI/ASME B31G-1984. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. New York; 1984.
10. ASME B31G-1991. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipeline. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1991.
11. ASME B31G-2009. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2009.
12. Recommended Practice. DET NORSKE VERITAS, DNV-RP-F101. Corroded Pipelines; 2004.
13. Denny R. Stephens, Brian N. Leis. Development of alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to-high-toughness pipe. Battelle Energy Products Division, 505 King Ave Columbus, Ohio 43201-2693. In: 2000 international pipeline conference, vol. 2. ASME 2000.
14. Kiefner JF, Vieth PH. A Modified criterion for evaluation the remaining strength of corroded pipe. Final report on project PR 3-805 to the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association; 1989.
15. Fu B, Batte AD. New Methods for assessing the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. In: Proceedings of EPRG/PRCI 12th biennial joint technical meeting on pipeline research, Groningen, The Netherlands. Paper # 28; 1999.
16. Choi J.B., Goo B.K. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines. Int J Press Vessels Pip 2003, 80:121-128.
17. Zhu XK, Leis BN. Influence of the Yield-To-Tensile Strength Ratio on Failure assessment of Corroded Pipelines. In: Proceedings of ASME-PVP 2003: pressure vessels and piping conference. Cleveland, Ohio (USA); July 20-24, 2003.
18. Hollomon J.H. Trans AIME 1945, 162:268-290.
19. Skelton R.P., Maier H.J., Christ H.J. The Baushinger effect, masing model and the Ramberg-Osgood relation for cyclic deformation in metals. Mater Sci Eng A 1997, 238:377-390.
20. Leis BN, Stephens DR. An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe - Part I: current status and Part II: alternative criterion. In: Proceedings of the seventh international offshore and polar engineering conference, vol. IV. Honolulu (USA); May 25-30, 1997. p. 624-41.
21. Chouchaoui BA, Pick RJ, Yost DB. Burst pressure predictions of line pipe containing single corrosion pits using finite element method. Pipeline-Technology. ASME OMAE 1992; vol. V-A; 203-10.
22. Chouchaoui B.A., Pick R.J. Behavior of circumferentially aligned corrosion pits. J Press Vessel Pip 1994, 57:187-200.
23. Bjornoy OH, Ole Rengard, Stein Fredheim. Residual strength of dented Pipelines, DNV Test Results. In: Proceedings of the 10th international offshore and polar engineering conference seattle. USA; May 28-June 2, 2000; ISBN I-880653-46-X (Set).
24. Mok DRB, Pick RJ, Glover AG. Behavior of line pipe with long external corrosion. MP 1990;29(5):75-9.
25. Adilson C, Benjamin Renaldo D. Vieira, Jose Luis F, et al. Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion, vol. 2. International pipeline conference; 2000.
26. Cronin Duane S, Roberts K. Andrew, Pick Roy J. Assessment of long corrosion grooves in line pipe. In: Department of mechanical engineering. International pipeline conference, vol. 1. ASME. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo; 1996.
27. Daruo Braga Noronha Jr, Asilson Carvalho Benjimin. Finite element models for the prediction of the failure pressure of pipeline with long corrosion defects. In: Proceedings of IPC'02, 4th international pipeline conference. Canada; September 29-October 3, 2002.
28. Mok D.R.B., Pick R.J., Glover A.G. Bursting of line pipe with long external corrosion. J Press Vessel Pip 1991, 46:195-216.
29. ADVANTICA. corrosion assessment guidance for high strength steels (phase1).
30. Freire J.L.F., Vieira R.D., Benjamin A.C., et al. PART 3: Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss. Exp Tech 2006, 11:60-65.