Description and comparison of quality of electronic versus paper-based resident admission forms in Australian aged care facilities

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 313-324

  Wang, Ning ^a   Yu, Ping ^a   Hailey, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Admission form; Auditing; Electronic health record; Electronic record; Evaluation; Nursing documentation; Paper record; Quality

Indexed keywords

ADMISSION FORM; AUDITING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ELECTRONIC RECORDS; EVALUATION; NURSING DOCUMENTATION;

BIOINFORMATICS; IMAGE QUALITY;

RECORDS MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHECKLIST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELDERLY CARE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESIDENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AUSTRALIA; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PAPER; PATIENT ADMISSION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84876958510     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Oroviogoicoechea C., Elliott B., Watson R. Evaluating information systems in nursing. J. Clin. Nurs. 2008, 17:567-575.
2. Urquhart C., Currell R., Grant M.J., Hardiker N.R. Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, 21(1):CD002099.
3. Saranto K., Kinnunen U.M. Evaluating nursing documentation - research designs and methods: systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2009, 65(3):464-476.
4. Resnick H.E., Manard B.B., et al. Use of electronic information systems in nursing facilities: United States. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004, 16(2):179.
5. Larrabee J., Boldreghini B., et al. Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Comput. Nurs. 2001, 19(2):13.
6. Avidan A., Weissman C. Record completeness and data concordance in an anesthesia information management system using context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2012, 81(3):173-181.
7. Ammenwerth E., Rauchegger F., Ehlers F., et al. Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: an evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2011, 80(1):25-38.
8. Pelleter D., Duffield C., Gietzelt D., et al. The complexities of documenting clinical information in long-term care setting in Australia. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2002, 28(5):8-12.
9. Jeong S.Y.S. Documentation leads to reform. Geriaction 2003, 21(4):22-25.
10. Daskein R., Moyle W., Creedy D. Aged-care nurses' knowledge of nursing documentation: an Australian perspective. J. Clin. Nurs. 2009, 18(14):2087-2095.
11. Munyisia E.N., Yu P., Hailey D. The changes in caregivers' perceptions about the quality of information and benefits of nursing documentation associated with the introduction of an electronic documentation system in a nursing home. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2011, 80(2):116-126.
12. Hayrinen K., Sarantoa K., Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77:291-304.
13. Callen J.L., Alderton M., McIntosh J. Evaluation of electronic discharge summaries: a comparison of documentation in electronic and handwritten discharge summaries. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77(9):613-620.
14. Chan L.S., Schonfeld N. How much information is lost during processing? A case study of pediatric emergency department records. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1993, 26(6):582-591.
15. Yussuff K., Awotunde M. The frequency of drug history documentation in an institutionalized tertiary care setting in Nigeria. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 8(2):141-146.
16. Prins H., Kruisinga F.H., Buller H.A., Zwetsloot-Schonk J.H.M. Availability and usability of data for medical practice assessment. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2002, 14(2):127-137.
17. Mbabazi P., Cassimjee R. The quality of nursing documentation in a hospital in Rwanda. Afr. J. Nurs. Midwifery 2006, 8(1):12.
18. Pringle M., Ward P., Chilvers C. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 1995, 45:537-541.
19. Floor-Schreudering A., De Smet P.A.G.M., Buurma H., Egberts A.C.G., Bouvy M.L. Documentation quality in community pharmacy: completeness of electronic patient records after patients' first visits. Ann. Pharmacother. 2009, 43(11):1787-1794.
20. Schleyer T., Spallek H., Hernandez P. A qualitative investigation of the content of dental paper-based and computer-based record formats. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007, 14(4):515-526.
21. Wang N., Hailey D., Yu P. Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2011, 67(9):1858-1875.
22. Netten A., Darton R., Bebbington A., Forder J., Brown P., Mummery K. Residential and nursing facility care of elderly people with cognitive impairment: prevalence, mortality and costs. Aging Ment. Health 2001, 5(1):14-22.
23. Ahmadian L., van Engen-Verheul M., Bakhshi-Raiez F., Peek N., Cornet R., de Keizer N.F. The role of standardized data and terminological systems in computerized clinical decision support systems: literature review and survey. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2010, 80(2):81-93.