Reply to the Comment by Mauder on "How Well Can We Measure the Vertical Wind Speed? Implications for Fluxes of Energy and Mass"

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

Volumn 147, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 337-345

  Kochendorfer, John ^a   Meyers, Tilden P ^a   Frank, John M ^b   Massman, William J ^b   Heuer, Mark W ^a,c  

^a NOAA Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c OAK RIDGE ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Angle of attack error; Cosine error; Eddy covariance; Energy balance closure; Sonic anemometer; Transducer shadowing

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; COSINE ERRORS; EDDY COVARIANCE; NON-ORTHOGONAL; SONIC ANEMOMETER; TURBULENT STATISTICS; VERTICAL WIND;

ANEMOMETERS; BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW;

WIND EFFECTS;

ANEMOMETER; CORRELATION; EDDY COVARIANCE; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY FLUX; TIME SERIES; TRANSDUCER; TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER; WIND VELOCITY;

EID: 84876957323     PISSN: 00068314     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-012-9792-8     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Burns SP, Horst TW, Blanken PD, Monson RK (2012) Using sonic anemometer temperature to measure sensible heat flux in strong winds. Atmos Meas Tech Discuss 5(1): 447-469.
2. Frank J, Massman WJ, Ewers BE (2012) Underestimates of sensible heat flux due to vertical velocity measurement errors in non-orthogonal sonic anemometers. Agric For Meteorol. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. agrformet. 2012. 11. 005.
3. Gash JHC, Dolman AJ (2003) Sonic anemometer (co)sine response and flux measurement i. The potential for (co)sine error to affect sonic anemometer-based flux measurements. Agric For Meteorol 119(3-4): 195-207.
4. Kaimal JC, Gaynor JE, Zimmerman HA, Zimmerman GA (1990) Minimizing flow distortion errors in a sonic anemometer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 53(1): 103-115.
5. Kochendorfer J, Meyers TP, Frank JM, Massman WJ, Heuer MW (2012) How well can we measure the vertical wind speed? Implications for fluxes of energy and mass. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 145(2): 383-398.
6. Leuning R, van Gorsel E, Massman WJ, Isaac PR (2012) Reflections on the surface energy imbalance problem. Agric For Meteorol 156: 65-74.
7. Loescher HW, Ocheltree T, Tanner B, Swiatek E, Dano B, Wong J, Zimmerman G, Campbell J, Stock C, Jacobsen L, Shiga Y, Kollas J, Liburdy J, Law BE (2005) Comparison of temperature and wind statistics in contrasting environments among different sonic anemometer-thermometers. Agric For Meteorol 133(1-4): 119-139.
8. Mauder M (2013) A comment on "How well can we measure the vertical wind speed? Implications for fluxes of energy and mass" By Kochendorfer et al. Boundary-Layer Meteorol (this issue).
9. Mauder M, Oncley SP, Vogt R, Weidinger T, Ribeiro L, Bernhofer C, Foken T, Kohsiek W, De Bruin HAR, Liu H (2007) The energy balance experiment ebex-2000. Part ii: intercomparison of eddy-covariance sensors and post-field data processing methods. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123(1): 29-54.
10. Meyers TP, Kochendorfer J, Heuer M (2010) Field estimates of sonic anemometer angle of attack errors. Paper presented at 29th Conference on Agric For Meteorol, Keystone, CO., Aug, 2010.
11. Nakai T, van der Molen MK, Gash JHC, Kodama Y (2006) Correction of sonic anemometer angle of attack errors. Agric For Meteorol 136(1-2): 19-30.
12. van der Molen MK, Gash JHC, Elbers JA (2004) Sonic anemometer (co)sine response and flux measurement-ii. The effect of introducing an angle of attack dependent calibration. Agric For Meteorol 122(1-2): 95-109.