The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research?

Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 227-236

  Yoo, Youngjin ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital innovation; Generativity; Modularity

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION USE;

DIGITAL ARTIFACTS; DIGITAL INNOVATIONS; GENERATIVITY; INNOVATION MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTISES; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; MODULARITY; TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENTS; THEORETICAL MODELING;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84876936146     PISSN: 15583457     EISSN: 15369323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00334     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abernathy, W., & Utterback, J. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80, 41-47.
2. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1(7), 1.
3. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant design: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604-633.
4. Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.
5. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1997). Managing in the age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 84-93.
6. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules, vol. 1: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.
8. Barabási, A. L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: Understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 101-113.
9. Benner, M. J. (2010). Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organization Science, 21(1), 42-62.
10. Benner, M. J., & Tripsas, M. (2012). The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3), 277-302.
11. Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631-647.
12. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L., & Yang, S. (1998). Intangible assets: How the interaction of computers and organizational structure affects stock market valuations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland.
13. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23-48.
14. Brynjolfsson, E., Malone, T. W., Gurbaxani, V., & Kambil, A. (1994). Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science, 40(12), 1628-1644.
15. Chandler, A. D., & Cortada, J. W. (2000). A nation transformed by information: How information has shaped the United States from Colonial Times to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Clark, K. B. (1985). The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy, 14, 235-251.
17. Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Re-engineering work through information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
19. Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science, 6(4), 337-349.
20. Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1995). Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 93-109.
21. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Langlois, R. (2003). Managing in the modular age: Architecture, networks and organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
22. Gaskin, J., Lyytinen, K., Thummadi, V., Schutz, D., Yoo, Y., Weiss, A., & Berente, N. (2010). Design DNA sequencing: A set of methodological artifacts for sequencing socio-technical design routines. 2010 International Conference on Information Systems.
23. Gawer, A. (2009). Platform dynamics and strategies: From products to services. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 45-76). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
24. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual team. Organization Science, 10(6), 791-865.
25. Kallinikos, J. (2006). The consequences of information: Institutional implications of technological change. Cheltenham, Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
26. Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2010). A theory of digital objects. First Monday, 15(6-7).
27. Langlois, R. N. (1992). External economies and economic progress: The case of the microcomputer industry. The Business History Review, 66(1), 1-50.
28. Langlois, R.N., & Robertson, P. (1992). Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy, 21, 297-313.
29. Lassig, L. (2008). Remix: making art and commerce thrive in the hyrid economy. New York: Penguin Press.
30. Leonardi, P., & Bailey, D. (2008). Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 159-176.
31. Leonardi, P., & Barley, S. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18(3), 159-176.
32. Leonardi, P. M. (2010). Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday, 15(6-7).
33. Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147-167.
34. Levina, N., & Ross, J. (2003). From the vendor's perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331-364.
35. Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2002). The next wave of nomadic computing. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 377-388.
36. Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El-Sawy, O. (2005). Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 145-187.
37. Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: Effects of information technology on market structure and corporate strategies. Communications of the ACM,30(6), 484-497.
38. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.). (1992). Network and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Bussines School Press.
39. Orlikowski, W., & Scott, S. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 433-474.
40. Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145-166.
41. Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Infomation Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
42. Overby, E., Slaughter, S. A., & Konsynski, B. (2010). Research commentary: The design, use, and consequences of virtual processes. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 700-710.
43. Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2007). Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 781-795.
44. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225-246.
45. Ravasz, E., & Barabási, A. L. (2003). Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Physical Review E, 67(2), 026112.
46. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Recontualizaing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-264.
47. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2000). The organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era-a prognosis of practice and a call for research. Infomation Systems Research, 11(2), 105-114.
48. Sanchez, R. A., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibiliity and knowlddge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 63-76.
49. Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular system theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 312-334.
50. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
51. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
52. Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467-482.
53. Sosa, M., Eppinger, S., & Rowles, C. (2004). The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure. Management Science, 50(12), 1674-1689.
54. Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., & Rowles, C.M. (2007). A network approach to define modularity of components in complex products. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 1118.
55. Staudenmayer, N., Tripsas, M., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Interfirm modularity and its implications for product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(4), 303-321.
56. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Research commentary: Digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.
57. Tripsas, M. (2009). Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of "the Digital Photography Company. Organization Science, 20(2), 441-460.
58. Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation: Change and meaning in the age of the Internet. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Tushman, M. L., & Murmann, J. P. (1998). Dominant designs, technology cycles and organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 231-266.
60. Ulrich, K. (1995). The Role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419-440.
61. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213-231.
63. Yoo, Y., Bolad, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovations in digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398-1408.
64. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(5), 724-735.
65. Zammuto, R., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749-762.
66. Zittrain, J. (2006). The generative Internet. Harvard Law Review,119, 1974-2040.