Density and breast cancer risk

Radiology

Volumn 267, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 657-658

  Harvey, Jennifer A ^a   Yaffe, Martin J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LETTER; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84876933512     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122477     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012;265(1): 59-69.
2. D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA. To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology 2012;265(1):9-11.
3. Pawluczyk O, Augustine BJ, Yaffe MJ, et al. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 2003;30(3):352-364.
4. Alonzo-Proulx O, Packard N, Boone JM, et al. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55(11):3027-3044.
5. Jeffreys M, Warren R, Highnam R, Smith GD. Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form. Br J Radiol 2006;79(941):378-382.
6. Kaufhold J, Thomas JA, Eberhard JW, Galbo CE, Trotter DE. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. Med Phys 2002; 29(8):1867-1880.
7. van Engeland S, Snoeren PR, Huisman H, Boetes C, Karssemeijer N. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(3):273-282.