The value of mucosal allergen challenge for the diagnosis of food allergy

Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 268-272

  Kvenshagen, Bente K ^a   Jacobsen, Morten ^a  

^a Oestfold Hospital Trust   (Norway)

Author keywords

diagnosis; food allergy; mucosal challenge

Indexed keywords

FOOD ALLERGEN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; PLACEBO;

ANAPHYLAXIS; CHEEK MUCOSA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLONOSCOPIC ALLERGEN PROVOCATION TEST; COLONOSCOPY; CONJUNCTIVA; CONJUNCTIVAL PROVOCATION TEST; EMBASE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; EOSINOPHILIA; FOOD ALLERGY; HUMAN; IMMUNE FUNCTION TEST; MAST CELL DEGRANULATION; MEDLINE; MUCOSAL PROVOCATION TEST; NOSE MUCOSA; NOSE PROVOCATION TEST; PRICK TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; REVIEW; SKIN PRICK TEST; SKIN TEST; STOMACH MUCOSA; SYMPTOM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; URTICARIA;

ALLERGENS; ANIMALS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CONJUNCTIVA; FOOD; FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY; HUMANS; IMMUNIZATION; IMMUNOLOGIC TESTS; MUCOUS MEMBRANE;

EID: 84876930106     PISSN: 15284050     EISSN: 14736322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32836093f6     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Sackesen C, Assa'ad A, Baena-Cagnani C, et al. Cow's milk allergy as a global challenge. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:243-248.
2. Solinas C, Corpino M, Maccioni R, Pelosi U. Cow's milk protein allergy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23 (Suppl 3):76-79.
3. Skypala I. Adverse food reactions: an emerging issue for adults. J Am Diet Assoc 2011; 111:1877-1891.
4. Lieberman JA, Sicherer SH. Diagnosis of food allergy: epicutaneous skin tests, in vitro tests, and oral food challenge. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2011; 11:58-64.
5. Ro AD, SaunesM, Smidesang I, et al. Agreement ofspecific IgE and skin prick test in an unselected cohort of two-year-old children. Eur J Pediatr 2012; 171:479-484.
6. Reimann HJ, Ring J, Ultsch B, Wendt P. Intragastral provocation under endoscopic control (IPEC) in food allergy: mast cell and histamine changes in gastric mucosa. Clin Allergy 1985; 15:195-202. (Pubitemid 15147543)
7. Amlot PL, Urbanek R, Youlten LJF. Type I allergy to egg and milk proteins: comparison of skin prick tests with nasal, buccal and gastric provocation tests. Int Archs Allergy appl Immun 1985; 77:171-173. (Pubitemid 15031446)
8. Bischoff SC, Mayer J, Meier P. Clinical significance of the colonoscopic allergen provocation test. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1997; 113:348-351. (Pubitemid 27160810)
9. Arslan G, Ødegaard S, Elsayed S. Food allergy and intolerance: response to intestinal provocation monitored by endosonography. Eur J Ultrasound 2002; 15:29-36. (Pubitemid 34578564)
10. Krane Kvenshagen B, Jacobsen M, Halvorsen R. Can conjunctival provocation test facilitate the diagnosis of food allergy in children? Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2010; 38:321-326.
11. Rueff F, Friedl T, Arnold A. Release of mast cell tryptase into saliva: a toll to diagnose food allergy by a mucosal challenge test? Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011; 155:282-288.
12. Pickert CN, Lorentz A, Manns MP, Bischoff SC. Colonoscopic allergen provocation test with rBet v 1 in patients with pollen-associated food allergy. Allergy 2012; DOI: 10.1111/all.12006.
13. Dordal MT, Lluch-Bernal M, Sanchez MC, et al. Allergen-specific nasal provoc ation testing: review by the rhinoconjunctivitis committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2011; 21:1-12.