Early quality assessment lessens pheromone specificity in a moth

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 18, 2013, Pages 7377-7382

  Kárpáti, Zsolt ^a   Tasin, Marco ^b   Cardé, Ring T ^c   Dekker, Teun ^b  

^a PLANT PROTECTION INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Blend recognition; Evolution; Odor processing; Sensory constraints; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INTROGRESSION; MAIZE; MALE; MATING; MOTH; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SEXUAL SELECTION; TIME;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENT, CONTROLLED; FEMALE; MALE; MOTHS; PHEROMONES; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; SENSORY RECEPTOR CELLS;

LEPIDOPTERA; OSTRINIA NUBILALIS;

EID: 84876923486     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216145110     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Löfstedt C (1993) Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Phyl Trans Roy Soc B 340:167-177.
2. Baker T, Fadamiro H (1998) Moth uses fine tuning for odour resolution. Nature 393:530. (Pubitemid 28319233)
3. Mafra-Neto A, Cardé RT (1994) Fine-scale structure of pheromone plumes modulates upwind orientation of flying moths. Nature 369:142-144.
4. Vickers NJ, Christensen TA, Baker TC, Hildebrand JG (2001) Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain 's olfactory code. Nature 410(6827):466-470. (Pubitemid 32240045)
5. Kárpáti Z, Dekker T, Hansson BS (2008) Reversed functional topology in the antennal lobe of the male European corn borer. J Exp Biol 211(Pt 17):2841-2848.
6. Kárpáti Z, Olsson S, Hansson BS, Dekker T (2010) Inheritance of central neuroanatomy and physiology related to pheromone preference in the male European corn borer. BMC Evol Biol 10:286.
7. Linn CE, Jr., Campbell MG, Roelofs WL (1987) Pheromone components and active spaces: What do moths smell and where do they smell it? Science 237(4815):650-652.
8. Roelofs W, et al. (1987) Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84(21):7585-7589.
9. Linn CE, Young MS, Gendle M, Glover TJ, Roelofs WL (1997) Sex pheromone blend discrimination in two races and hybrids of the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis. Physiol Entomol 22(3):212-223. (Pubitemid 27506819)
10. Lassance JM, et al. (2010) Allelic variation in a fatty-acyl reductase gene causes divergence in moth sex pheromones. Nature 466(7305):486-489.
11. Klun JA, Huettel MD (1988) Genetic regulation of sex pheromone production and response. J Chem Ecol 14(11):2047-2061.
12. Dopman EB, Robbins PS, Seaman A (2010) Components of reproductive isolation between North American pheromone strains of the European corn borer. Evolution 64(4):881-902.
13. Roelofs WL, Du JW, Tang XH, Robbins PS, Eckenrode CJ (1985) Three European corn borer populations in New York based on sex pheromones and voltinism. J Chem Ecol 11(7):829-836.
14. Linn CE, Roelofs WL (1985) Response specificity of male pink bollworm moths to different blends and dosages of sex pheromone. J Chem Ecol 11(11):1583-1590.
15. Schlyter F, et al. (2001) A model for peak and width of signaling windows: Ips duplicatus and Chilo partellus pheromone component proportions-does response have a wider window than production? J Chem Ecol 27(7):1481-1511. (Pubitemid 32709104)
16. Baker TC, Hansson BS, Löfstedt C, Löfqvist J (1988) Adaptation of antennal neurons in moths is associated with cessation of pheromone-mediated upwind flight. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(24):9826-9830. (Pubitemid 19027218)
17. Bernays EA (2001) Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: Implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu Rev Entomol 46:703-727.
18. Showers WB, Reed GL, Robinson JF, Derozari MB (1976) Flight and sexual activity of the European corn borer. Environ Entomol 5(6):1099-1104.
19. Malausa T, et al. (2005) Assortative mating in sympatric host races of the European corn borer. Science 308(5719):258-260. (Pubitemid 40558862)
20. Lassance JM, Löfstedt C (2009) Concerted evolution of male and female display traits in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. BMC Biol 7:10.
21. Groot AT, Classen A, Staudacher A, Schal C, Heckel DG (2010) Phenotypic plasticity in sexual communication signal of a noctuid moth. J Evol Biol 23(12):2731-2738.
22. Frolov AN, et al. (2012) From Russia with lobe: Genetic differentiation in trilobed uncus Ostrinia spp. follows food plant, not hairy legs. Heredity (Edinb) 108(2):147-156.
23. Tabata J, Takanashi T, Ishikawa Y (2003) Pheromone analysis of wild female moths with a PBAN C-terminal peptide injection for an estimation of assortative mating in adzuki bean borer, Ostrinia scapulalis. J Chem Ecol 29(12):2749-2759. (Pubitemid 38018279)
24. Cardé RT, et al. (1978) European corn borer: Pheromone polymorphism or sibling species? Science 199(4328):555-556.
25. Allison JD, Cardé RT (2008) Male pheromone blend preference function measured in choice and no-choice wind tunnel trials with almond moths, Cadra cautella. Anim Behav 75(1):259-266. (Pubitemid 350298100)
26. Galizia CG, Rössler W (2010) Parallel olfactory systems in insects: Anatomy and function. Annu Rev Entomol 55:399-420.
27. Andersson MN, Schlyter F, Hill SR, Dekker T (2012) What reaches the antenna? How to calibrate odor flux and ligand-receptor affinities. Chem Senses 37(5):403-420, 10.1093/chemse/bjs009.
28. Su CY, Martelli C, Emonet T, Carlson JR (2011) Temporal coding of odor mixtures in an olfactory receptor neuron. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(12):5075-5080.
29. Olsen SR, Bhandawat V, Wilson RI (2010) Divisive normalization in olfactory population codes. Neuron 66(2):287-299.
30. Silbering AF, Okada R, Ito K, Galizia CG (2008) Olfactory information processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe: Anything goes? J Neurosci 28(49):13075-13087.
31. Witzgall P, Bengtsson M, Rauscher S, Liblikas I (2001) Identification of further sex pheromone synergists in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Entomol Exp Appl 101(2):131-141. (Pubitemid 34170068)