Diameter-sensitive biocompatibility of anodic TiO2 nanotubes treated with supercritical CO2 fluid

Nanoscale Research Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-8

  Lan, Ming Ying ^a,b   Liu, Chia Pei ^c   Huang, Her Hsiung ^b   Chang, Jeng Kuei ^c   Lee, Sheng Wei ^c  

^a TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Anodic oxidation; Biocompatibility; Fluid; Human fibroblast cells; Nanotubes

Indexed keywords

ANODIC OXIDATION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CELL CULTURE; FIBROBLASTS; FLUIDS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TOPOGRAPHY;

DIAMETER DEPENDENCES; HUMAN FIBROBLAST CELLS; NANOTUBE DIAMETERS; SELF-ORDERING PROCESS; SUPERCRITICAL CO2; SUPERCRITICAL CO2 (SCCO2); SURFACE WETTABILITY; UV-LIGHT IRRADIATION;

NANOTUBES;

EID: 84876921541     PISSN: 19317573     EISSN: 1556276X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-150     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T: A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone. Clin Oral Implan Res 1991, 2:24-29.
2. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J: Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001, 16:323-332.
3. Olmedo D, Fernández MM, Guglielmotti MB, Cabrini RL: Macrophages related to dental implant failure. Implant Dent 2003, 12:75-80.
4. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini J, Fox C, Stich H: Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991, 25:889-902.
5. Hansson S, Norton M: The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999, 32:829-836.
6. Davies JE: Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003, 67:932-949.
7. Oliveira PT, Nanci A: Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004, 25:403-413.
8. Mendonça G, Mendonça DBS, Aragão FJL, Cooper LF: Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3822-3835.
9. Yang WE, Hsu ML, Lin MC, Chen ZH, Chen LK, Huang HH: Nano/submicron-scale TiO2 network on titanium surface for dental implant application. J Alloy Compd 2009, 479:642-647.
10. Dong W, Zhang T, Epstein J, Cooney L, Wang H, Li Y, Jiang YB, Cogbill A, Varadan V, Tian ZR: Multifunctional nanowire bioscaffolds on titanium. Chem Mater 2007, 19:4454-4459.
11. Chiang CY, Chiou SH, Yang WE, Hsu ML, Yung MC, Tsai ML, Chen LK, Huang HH: Formation of TiO2 nano-network on titanium surface increases the human cell growth. Dent Mater 2009, 25:1022-1029.
12. Su Z, Zhou W: Formation, morphology control and applications of anodic TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Mater Chem 2011, 21:8955-8970.
13. Chen JG, Chen CY, Wu CG, Lin CY, Lai YH, Wang CC, Chen HW, Vittal R, Ho KC: An efficient flexible dye-sensitized solar cell with a photoanode consisting of TiO2 nanoparticle-filled and SrO-coated TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Mater Chem 2010, 20:7201-7207.
14. Popat KC, Eltgroth M, LaTempa TJ, Grimes CA, Desai TA: Titania nanotubes: a novel platform for drug-eluting coatings for medical implants. Small 2007, 3:1878-1881.
15. Das K, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A, Karandikar B, Gibbins BL: Surface coatings for improvement of bone cell materials and antimicrobial activities of Ti implants. J Biomed Mater Res B 2008, 87:455-460.
16. Chun AL, Moralez JG, Webster TJ, Fenniri H: Helical rosette nanotubes: a biomimetic coating for orthopedics. Biomaterials 2005, 26:7304-7309.
17. Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, Desai TA: Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 2007, 28:3188-3197.
18. Bauer S, Park J, von der Mark K, Schmuki P: Improved attachment of mesenchymal stem cells on super-hydrophobic TiO2 nanotubes. Acta Biomater 2008, 4:1576-1582.
19. Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P: Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007, 7:1686-1691.
20. Bauer S, Park J, Faltenbacher J, Berger S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P: Size selective behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on ZrO2 and TiO2 nanotube array. Integr Biol 2009, 1:525-532.
21. McCool B, Tripp CP: Inaccessible hydroxyl groups on silica are accessible in supercritical CO2. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109:8914-8919.
22. Tsai PJ, Yang CH, Hsu WC, Tsai WT, Chang JK: Enhancing hydrogen storage on carbon nanotubes via hybrid chemical etching and Pt decoration employing supercritical carbon dioxide fluid. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012, 37:6714-6720.
23. Reverchon E, Porta GD, Adami R: Medical device sterilization using supercritical CO2 based mixtures. Recent Pat Chem Eng 2010, 3:000-000.
24. Gu W, Tripp CP: Reaction of silanes in supercritical CO2 with TiO2 and Al2O3. Langmuir 2006, 22:5748-5752.
25. Zhu K, Vinzant TB, Neale NR, Frank AJ: Removing structural disorder from oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: reducing the dimensionality of transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 2007, 7:3739-3746.
26. Su Z, Zhou W: Formation mechanism of porous anodic aluminium and titanium oxides. Adv Mater 2008, 20:1-5.
27. Wang D, Liu Y, Yu B, Zhou F, Liu W: TiO2 nanotubes with tunable morphology, diameter, and length: synthesis and photo-electrical/ catalytic performance. Chem Mater 2009, 21:1198-1206.
28. Lai CW, Sreekantan S: Photoelectrochemical performance of smooth TiO2 nanotube arrays: effect of anodization temperature and cleaning methods. Int J Photoenergy 2012, 2012:356943-1-356943-11.
29. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA: Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3 T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 41:422-430.
30. Das K, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A: Surface modifications and cell-materials interactions with anodized Ti. Acta Biomater 2007, 3:573-585.
31. Wenzel RN: Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 1936, 28:988-994.
32. Cassie ABD, Baxter S: Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 1944, 40:546-551.
33. Petters MD, Prenni AJ, Kreidenweis SM, DeMott PJ, Matsunaga A, Lim YB, Ziemann PJ: Chemical aging and the hydrophobic-to-hydrophilic conversion of carbonaceous aerosol. Geophys Res Lett 2006, 33:L24806-1-L24806-5.
34. Hashimoto K, Irie H, Fujishima A: TiO2 photocatalysis: a historical overview and future prospects. Jpn J Appl Phys 2005, 44:8269-8285.
35. Collins-Martínez V, Ortiz AL, Elguézabal AA: Influence of the anatase/rutile ratio on the TiO2 photocatalytic activity for the photodegradation of light hydrocarbons. Iny J Chem React Eng 2007, 5:A92-1-A92-11.
36. Lauchlan L, Chen SP, Etemad S, Kletter M, Heeger AJ, MacDiarmid AG: Absolute Raman scattering cross sections of trans-(CH)x. Phys Rev B 1983, 27:2301-2307.
37. Kalyanasundaram K, Thomas JK: The conformational state of surfactants in the solid state and in micellar form. A laser-excited Raman scattering study. J Phys Chem 1976, 80:1462-1473.
38. Dalby MJ, Childs S, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJH, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG: Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. Biomaterials 2003, 24:927-935.
39. Schlaepfer DD, Hauck CR, Sieg DJ: Signaling through focal adhesion kinase. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1999, 71:435-478.