Narrow-band imaging with dual focus magnification in differentiating colorectal neoplasia

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 25, Issue SUPPL.2, 2013, Pages 16-20

  Singh, Rajvinder ^a,b   Jayanna, Mahesh ^a   Navadgi, Suresh ^a   Ruszkiewicz, Andrew ^a,b   Saito, Yutaka ^c   Uedo, Noriya ^d  

^a LYELL MCEWIN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c NATIONAL CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

^d OSAKA MEDICAL CENTER FOR CANCER AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES   (Japan)

Author keywords

colorectal polyp; dual focus; magnification; narrow band imaging (NBI)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL POLYP; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAGNIFYING ENDOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NARROW BAND IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARROW BAND IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84876908681     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/den.12075     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: A pilot study. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1094-1098. (Pubitemid 39642471)
2. Hirata M, Tanaka S, Oka S, et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for diagnosis of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65: 988-995. (Pubitemid 46783816)
3. Singh R, Shonde A, Kaye P, et al. Distinction between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps utilizing narrow band imaging with magnification: A novel technique to increase the efficacy of CRC screening? Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2008; 43: 380-381. (Pubitemid 351238364)
4. East JE, Suzuki N, Stanrinidis M, Guenther T, Thomas HJ, Saunders BP,. Narrow Band Imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 2008; 57: 65-70.
5. Yashui S, Manabo M, Atsushi O, et al. Optical digital chromoendoscopy during colonoscopy using a narrow band imaging system. Dig. Endosc. 2005; 17: S43-48.
6. Hirata M, Tanaka S, Oka S, et al. Evaluation of microvessels in colorectal tumors by narrow band imaging magnification. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 66: 945-952. (Pubitemid 47610772)
7. Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP, Chen PC, Lin CJ, Chiu CT,. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic polyps. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 101: 2711-2716.
8. Chiu HM, Chang CY, Chen CC, et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2007; 56: 373-379.
9. Singh R, Owen V, Shonde A, Kaye P, Hawkey C, Ragunath K,. White light endoscopy, narrow band imaging and chromoendoscopy with magnification in diagnosing colorectal neoplasia. World J. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 1: 45-50.
10. Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Emura F, et al. Efficacy of capillary pattern type IIIA/IIIB by magnifying narrow band imaging for estimating depth of invasion in early colorectal neoplasms. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010; 10. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-33.
11. Hazewinkel Y, Lopez-Ceron M, Rastogi A, et al. Validation of endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas by international experts using high resolution endoscopy and narrow band imaging. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75: AB323-AB333.
12. Rex DK, Kahi C, O'Brien M, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 73: 419-422.
13. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Systematic review: Distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010; 31: 210-217.