Application of health belief model forpredicting delivery method among pregnant women ofsemirom: A cross-sectional research

World Applied Sciences Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 494-499

  Mohtasham, Ghaffari ^a   Afshari, Atefeh ^a  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cesarean; Health belief model; Natural delivery

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876903352     PISSN: 18184952     EISSN: 19916426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.22.04.402     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cunningham, F., K. Leveno, S. Bloom, J. Hauth, D. Rouse and Spong C. William's Obstetrics, 2010. Translated by Ghazi Jahani Bahram, Ghotbi Roshanak. Tehran: Golban; [In Persian], pp: 693-696.
2. Lalouei, A., N. Kashanizadeh and M. Teymoury, 2009. The influence of academic educations on choosing preferable delivery methode in obstetrics medical team: Investigating their viewpoints. Iranian Journal of Medical Education; [In Persian], 9(1): 69-78.
3. Gibbons, L., J. Belizan, J. Lauer, A. Betran, M. Meriald and F. Althabe, 2011. The global numbers and cost of additionally needed and unnecessary cesarean section performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. 2010. World Health Report. Available from:http:// www.who.int/ he althsy stems/ topics/ financing/ healthreport/ whr_background/en/index1.html.
4. World Health statistic, 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/ world_health_statistics/en/index.html. Accessed March 24, 2012.
5. Vahid Dastjerdy M. Health culture news, 2011. Health, Care and Education government. Available from:http://behdasht. gov. ir/ index.aspx?siteid=1andpageid=27467andnewsview =12392 and pro=nobak. Accessed July 19, 2011. [In Persian].
6. Landon, M.B., C. Hauthj, K.J. Leveno, M.W. Varner, 2004. Maternal and prenatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Engl Med, 351: 2581-2589.
7. Harper, M.A., R.P. Byington, M.A. Espeland, M. Naughton, R. Meyer and K. Lane, 2003. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. ObstetGynecol; 102(2): 273-278.
8. Fallahian, M., 2007. Cesarean with mother request. Journal of ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Science, [In Persian], 31(2): 107-108.
9. Angega, A.C., A.E. Washington, J.E. Vargas, R. Gomes, I. Rojas and A.B. Gaughey, 2006. Women's preference regarding mode of delivery: Which do they prefer and why?. Bjog; 113(11): 1253-1258.
10. Mohamadi Tabar, S. H, A. Kiani and M. Heidary, 2009. The survey on tendencies of primiparous women for selecting the mode of delivery. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences; [In Persian], 11(3): 54-59.
11. Smart, D.A., 2004. Attitudes, social support and self-efficacy (ASE): a prediction model for vaginal birth intentions [dissertation]. School of Public Health: University of Loma Linda, pp: 1-157.
12. Lowe, R.H. and J.D. Frey, 1983. Predicting Lamaze childbirth intentions and outcomes: an extension of the theory of reasoned action to a joint outcome. Basic and applied social psychology; 4(4): 353-372.
13. Pakenham, S., S.M. Chamberlain and G.N. Smith, 2006. Women's views on elective primary caesarean section. ObstetGynaecol; 28(12): 1089-1094.
14. Disney, J.A., 1998. The context of women's childbirth decisions regarding vaginal birth after cesarean section [dissertation]. College of Nursing: University of Arizona, pp: 1-178.
15. Fenwick, J., J. Gamle and Y. Hauck, 2007. Believing in birth choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectation of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. Journal of Clin Nurse; 16(8): 1561-1570.
16. Ridly, R.T., P.A. Davis, J.H. Bright and D. Sinclair, 2002. What influences women to choose vaginal birth after cesarean? Journal of Obstetric; 31(6): 665-672.
17. Gopton, A., 1994. Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean section: Influences on women's decision making [dissertation]. Medicine University: University of Manitoba, pp: 1-302.
18. Mohammad Pourasl, A., P. Asgharian, F. Rostami, A. Azizi and H. Akbari, 2009. Investigating the choice of delivery method type and its related factors in pregnant women in Maragheh. Journal of Knowledge and Health; [In Persian], 4(1): 36-39.
19. Negahban, T., A. Ansari Jaberi and M. Kazemi, 2006. Preference methods of delivery and its relevant causes in view of pregnant women referring to public and private clinics in Rafsanjan city. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services; [In Persian], 5(3): 161-168.
20. Dietz, H.P., V. Lanzarone, J.M. Simpson, 2006. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 27(4): 409-415.
21. Fathian, Z., Gh.R. Sharifirad, A. Hasanzadeh, Z. Fathian, 2007. Study of the effects of behavioral intention model education on reducing the cesarean rate among pregnant women of Khomeiny-Shahr, Isfahan, in 2006. Journal of Tabib-E-Shargh; [In Persian], 9(2): 123-131.
22. Sharifirad, Gh.R., Z. Fathian, M. Tirani and B. Mahaki, 2007. Study on behavioral intention model (BIM) to the attitude of pregnant women toward normal delivery and cesarean section in province of Isfahan-Khomeiny Shahr, 2006. Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences; [In Persian], 15(1): 19-23.
23. Yari, P., M. Mozafari, A. Abadi and K. Eetemad, 2010. Study of effective factors on delivery mode selection in pregnant women referring in to the Tehran hospitals. Journal of Knowledge and Health; [In Persian], 5(1): 130-135.
24. Kringeland, T., A. Kjersti Daltveit and A. Moller, 2010. How does preference for natural childbirth relate to the actual mode of delivery? A population-based cohort study from Norway. Birth; 37(1): 21-27.
25. Lauer, J.A., A.P. Betran, M. Merialdi and D. Wojdila, 2011. Determinants of caesarean section rates in developed countries: Supply, demand and opportunities for control. 2010. World Health Report. Available from: http:// www.who.int/ entity/ healthsystems/ topics/ financing/ healthreport/ 29 DeterminantsC-section.pdf.
26. Glanz, K.A., B.A. Rimer and K. Viswanath, 2008. Health behavior and health education theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; pp: 12-71.
27. Glanz, K., B.K. Rimer and S.M. Su, 2005. Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice.2nd ed. United States: United States national cancer institute; pp: 4-17.
28. Akbari, Z., 2009. Study on effect of education designed based on health belief model on reduce cesarean rate in pregnant women referring in to the health care centers in Mamasany in 2009 [dissertation]. School of Public Health: Isfahan University, [In Persian], pp: 1-105.
29. Chong, E. and M. Mongelli, 2003. Attitdes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal delivery. Gynecol and obstetric Journal; 80: 89-94.
30. Graham, W.J., V. Hundley, A.L. Mccheyne, M.H. Hall, E. Gurney and J. Milne, 1999. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to delivery by cesarean delivery. BRJ Obstet Gynecol, pp: 213-220.
31. Khorsandi, M., F. Ghofranipour, A. Heydarnia, S. Faghihzade, A. Akbarzade and M. Vafaei, 2008. Survey of perceived self-efficacy in pregnant women. Journal of Iran Medical System Organization; [In Persian], 26(1): 89-95.
32. FardiAzar, Z. and M. JafariShabiri, 2003. A survey for determining factors on women's attitudes toward vaginal and cesarean delivery. Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; [In Persian], 37(59): 66-69.
33. Fuglenes, D., P. Oian and I.S. Kristiansen, 2009. Obstetrician's choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous causes: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation. American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyJanuary; 1: 48-56.