Anonymity in science

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 195-196

  Neuroskeptic, ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; MOTIVATION; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHIATRY; PUBLICATION; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WRITING;

ANONYMS AND PSEUDONYMS; HISTORY, 16TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; SCIENCE;

EID: 84876885396     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.004     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Cohen M.N. Lewis Carroll: A Biography 1995, Vintage Books.
2. Rosen E. When did Copernicus write the 'Revolutions'?. Sudhoffs Arch. 1977, 61:144-155.
3. Dieudonne J.A. Should we teach 'modern' mathematics? An affirmation from a founder of Bourbaki of the principles of the new curricula in mathematics. Am. Sci. 1973, 61:16-19.
4. Raju T.N. William Sealy Gosset and William A. Silverman: two 'students' of science. Pediatrics 2005, 116:732-735.
5. Couzin-Frankel J. Image manipulation. Author of popular blog that charged fraud unmasked. Science 2013, 339:132.
6. Gorjao R., et al. Regulation of interleukin-2 signaling by fatty acids in human lymphocytes. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48:2009-2019.
7. Cury-Boaventura M.F., et al. Corrigendum to 'Comparative toxicity of oleic and linoleic acid on human lymphocytes' [Life Sci. 78 (2006) 1448-1456]. Life Sci. 2013, 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.01.014.
8. Brown R.J. The use of double anonymity in peer review: a decision whose time has come?. Qual. Assur. 2005, 11:103-109.
9. Brown H.M. Peer review should not be anonymous. BMJ 2003, 326:824.
10. Godlee F., et al. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998, 280:237-240.