Integrated environmental risk assessment and whole-process management system in chemical industry parks

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1609-1630

  Shao, Chaofeng ^a   Yang, Juan ^a   Tian, Xiaogang ^b   Meiting, Ju ^a   Huang, Lei ^a  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Sichuan Research Institute of Environmental Protection   (China)

Author keywords

Chemical industry parks; environmental risk assessment; Environmental risk management; Risk zoning; Tianjin binhai new area

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ZONING; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; POLLUTION CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION;

EID: 84876812262     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10041609     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bi, J.; Yang, L.; Li, Q.L. Regional Environmental Risk Analysis and Management; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006; pp. 25-38.
2. Roselló, M.J.; Martinez, J.M.; Navarro, B.A. Vulnerability of human environment to risk: Case of groundwater contamination risk. Environ. Inter. 2009, 35, 325-335.
3. Huttunen, H.; Wyness, L.E.; Kalliokoski, P. Identification of environmental hazards of gasoline oxygenate tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME). Chemosphere 1997, 35, 1199-1214.
4. Manassaram, D.M.; Orr, M.F.; Kaye, W.E. Hazardous substances events associated with the manufacturing of chemicals and allied products. J. Hazard. Mater. 2003, 104, 123-135.
5. Colbournea, D.; Suenb, K.O. Appraising the flammability hazards of hydrocarbon refrigerants using quantitative risk assessment model. Int. J. Refrig. 2004, 774-783.
6. Reniers, G.L.L.; de Jongh, K.; Gorrens, B. Transportation Risk Analysis tool for hazardous Substances (TRANS-A user-friendly, semi-quantitative multi-mode hazmat transport route safety risk estimation methodology for Flanders. Transport Res. Transport Environ. 2010, 15, 489-496.
7. Bernechea, E.J.; Viger, J.A. Design optimization of hazardous substance storage facilities to minimize project risk. Safety Sci. 2013, 51, 49-62.
8. Landucci, G.; Antonioni, G.; Tugnoli, A.; Cozzani, V. Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for atmospheric storage tanks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 2012, 106, 200-216.
9. Li, Q.; Bi, J.; Yang, J. Fuzzy evaluation model for industry park's environmental risk management performance and its apply. Environ. Protect. 2005, 12, 20-23, in Chinese.
10. Environmental Protection Apartment of China. Technical Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment on Projects (HJ/T 169-2004). Available online: http://kjs.mep.gov.cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/other/pjjsdz/200412/t20041211_63369.htm (assessed on 8 February 2013).
11. Pollard, S.; Purchase, D.; Herbert, S. A Practical Guide to Environmental Risk Assessment for Waste Management Facilities (Guidance Note 25 Version 2). Available online: http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/16/15252.pdf (assessed on 8 February 2013).
12. Venter, H.S.; Eloff, J.H.P.; Li, Y.L. Standardizing vulnerability categories. Comput. Secur. 2008, 27, 71-83.
13. Suter, G.W., II; Vermeire, T.; Munns, W.R., Jr.; Sekizawa, J. An integrated framework for health and ecological risk assessment. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2005, 207, 611-616.
14. Guiding Principles for Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response; OECD: Paris, France, 2003.
15. UNEP. APELL-Information and Tools for Emergency Response Planning, 2003. Available online: www.unep.fr/scp/sp/programme/ (assessed on 8 February 2013).
16. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 82/501/EEC on the Major Accident Hazards of Certain Industrial Activities; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Luxembourg, 1990; pp. 1-18.
17. European Communities. Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.douriCELEX:32012L0018:EN: NOT (assessed on 8 February 2013).
18. AEA Technology plc. Major Hazard Incident Data Service; Health and Safety Executive: London, UK, 2010.
19. Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research. Failure and Accidents Technical Information System. Available online: www.factsonlin.nl/ (assessed on 8 February 8 2013).
20. Federal Envimnmentel Agency. Central Major Accident Notification System. Available online: www.infosis.uba.de/index.php/en/site/13947/zema/index.html/(accessed on 8 February 2013).
21. French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development. Analysis, Research and Information on Accidents. Available online: www.aria.development-durable.gouv.fr/ (accessed on 8 February 2013).
22. Mago, V.K.; Bhatia, N. Cross-Disciplinary Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition: Advancing Technologies; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2012; pp. 1-16.
23. National Bureau of Statistics of China; Environmental Protection Apartment of China. China Environment Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2011.
24. The editorial department of environmental protection. Preventing environmental risks and ensuring environmental safety. Environ. Protect. 2011, 29, 15-16, in Chinese.
25. Meel, A.; O'Neill, L.M.; Levin, J.H.; Oktem, U.; Keren, N. Operational risk assessment of chemical industries by exploiting accident databases. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 2007, 20, 113-127.
26. Shi, C.; Duo, Y.Q. Safety Capacity for hazardous chemicals transportation of chemical industry park. Transport Standard. 2010, 5, 64-67, in Chinese.
27. Kappes, M.S.; Keiler, M.; Elverfeldt, K.V.; Glade, T. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: A review. Nat. Hazards. 2012, 64, 1925-1958.
28. Perles Roselló, M.J.; Prados, F.C. Problems and challenges in analyzing multiple territorial risks: Methodological proposals for the development of multi-hazard mapping. De la AGE y Otros. 2010, 52, 245-271.
29. Crossthwaite, P.J.; Fitzpatrick, R.D.; Hurst, N.W. Risk assessment for the siting of developments near liquefied petroleum gas installations. IChemE Symp. Ser. 1988, 110, 373-400.
30. COVO Commission. Risk Analysis of Six Potentially Hazardous Industrial Objects in the Rijnmond Area, a Pilot Study: A Report to the Rijnmond Public Authority; Central Environmental Control Agency Rijnmond: Dordtrecht, The Netherlands, 1981.
31. Logtenberg, M.T. Derivation of Failure Frequencies for LOC Cases; TNO: Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, 1998.
32. Spouge, J. New generic leak frequencies for process equipment. Proc. Safety Prog. 2005, 24, 249-257.
33. The Major Accident Hazards Bureau, European Commission. Accidental Risk Assessment Methodology for Industries in the Framework of SEVESO II Directive. Available online: http://mahb.jrc.it/index.phpid440 (accessed on 17 March 2013).