Graph-based multi-tweet summarization using social signals

24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1699-1714

  Liu, Xiao Hua ^a,b   Li, Y I Tong ^c   Wei, Fu Ru ^b   Zhou, Ming ^b  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH ASIA   (China)

^c BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Graph; Social signals; Summarization; Tweets

Indexed keywords

GRAPH; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; PRE-PROCESSING; SOCIAL NETWORKS; SOCIAL SIGNALS; SUMMARIZATION; SUMMARIZATION SYSTEMS; TWEETS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DATA PROCESSING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84876808182     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Barzilay, R., Elhadad, N., and McKeown, K. R. (2001). Sentence ordering in multidocument summarization. In HLT, pages 1-7.
2. Barzilay, R., McKeown, K. R., and Elhadad, M. (1999). Information fusion in the context of multi-document summarization. In ACL, pages 550-557.
3. Duan, Y., Jiang, L., Qin, T., Zhou, M., and Shum, H.-Y. (2010). An empirical study on learning to rank of tweets. In Coling, pages 295-303.
4. Efron, M. (2011). Information search and retrieval in microblogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6):996-1008.
5. Erkan, G. and Radev, D. R. (2004). LexRank: Graph-based Lexical Centrality as Salience in Text Summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 22.
6. Finin, T., Murnane, W., Karandikar, A., Keller, N., Martineau, J., and Dredze, M. (2010). Annotating named entities in twitter data with crowdsourcing. In CSLDAMT, pages 80-88.
7. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., and Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the u.s. congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8):1612-1621.
8. Goldstein, J., Kantrowitz, M., Mittal, V., and Carbonell, J. (1999). Summarizing text documents: Sentence selection and evaluation metrics. In In Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 121-128.
9. Hardy, H., Shimizu, N., Strzalkowski, T., Ting, L., Zhang, X., and Wise, G. B. (2002). Cross-document summarization by concept classification. In SIGIR, pages 121-128.
10. Heverin, T. and Zach, L. (2010). Twitter for city police department information sharing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1):1-7.
11. Inouye, D. and Kalita, J. K. (2011). Comparing twitter summarization algorithms for multiple post summaries. In SocialCom/PASSAT, pages 298-306.
12. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., and Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11):2169-2188.
13. Knight, K. and Marcu, D. (2002). Summarization beyond sentence extraction: A probabilistic approach to sentence compression. Artif. Intell., pages 91-107.
14. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., and Moon, S. (2010). What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW, pages 591-600.
15. Liu, X., Li, K., Han, B., Zhou, M., Jiang, L., Xiong, Z., and Huang, C. (2010). Semantic role labeling for news tweets. In Coling, pages 698-706.
16. Liu, X., Zhang, S., Wei, F., and Zhou, M. (2011). Recognizing named entities in tweets. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1, HLT '11, pages 359-367, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Mani, I. and Bloedorn, E. (1999). Summarizing similarities and differences among related documents. Inf. Retr., pages 35-67.
18. Neto, J., Freitas, A., and Kaestner, C. (2002). Automatic text summarization using a machine learning approach. In Bittencourt, G. and Ramalho, G., editors, Advances in Artificial Intelligence, volume 2507 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 205-215. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
19. O'Connor, B., Krieger, M., and Ahn, D. (2010). Tweetmotif: Exploratory search and topic summarization for twitter. In ICWSM.
20. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Winograd, T. (1998). The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project.
21. Priem, J. and Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1):1-4.
22. Qazvinian, V. and Radev, D. R. (2008). Scientific paper summarization using citation summary networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1, COLING '08, pages 689-696, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Qazvinian, V. and Radev, D. R. (2010). Identifying non-explicit citing sentences for citation-based summarization. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '10, pages 555-564, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Radev, D. (2004). Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents. Information Processing & Management, pages 919-938.
25. Saggion, H. (2011). Learning predicate insertion rules for document abstracting. In CICLing (2), pages 301-312.
26. Sankaranarayanan, J., Samet, H., Teitler, B. E., Lieberman, M. D., and Sperling, J. (2009). Twitterstand: news in tweets. In GIS, pages 42-51.
27. Sharifi, B., Hutton, M.-A., and Kalita, J. (2010). Summarizing microblogs automatically. In HLT: NAACL, HLT '10, pages 685-688.
28. Wan, X. and Yang, J. (2008). Multi-document summarization using cluster-based link analysis. In SIGIR, pages 299-306.
29. Weng, J., Lim, E. P., Jiang, J., and He, Q. (2010). TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In WSDM, pages 261-270, New York, NY, USA.
30. Xie, Z., Eugenio, B. D., and Nelson, P. C. (2008). From extracting to abstracting: Generating quasi-abstractive summaries. In LREC.