A phonemic corpus of polish child-directed speech

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1017-1020

  Boruta, Luc ^a,b,c   Jastrzebska, Justyna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b Programme Liliane Bettencourt   (France)

^c PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Child directed speech; Phonology; Polish

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; POLISHING; TRANSCRIPTION;

ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY; LANGUAGE ACQUISITION; LINGUISTIC RESOURCES; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; PHONOLOGY; PRE-PROCESSING OPERATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; TRAINING DATA;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 84876801180     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. D. Blanchard and J. Heinz. 2008. Improving word segmentation by simultaneously learning phonotactics. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Natural Language Learning, pages 65-72.
2. L. Boruta, S. Peperkamp, B. Crabbé, and E. Dupoux. 2011. Testing the robustness of online word segmentation: effects of linguistic diversity and phonetic variation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, pages 1-9.
3. M. R. Brent and T. A. Cartwright. 1996. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61:93-125. Data available online from http://childes. psy. cmu. edu/derived/brent ratner. zip.
4. R. Daland and J. B. Pierrehumbert. 2010. Learning diphone-based segmentation. Cognitive Science, 35 (1):119-155.
5. T. Gambell and C. Yang. 2004. Statistics learning and universal grammar: modeling word segmentation. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
6. S. Goldwater, T. L. Griffiths, and M. Johnson. 2009. A Bayesian framework for word segmentation: exploring the effects of context. Cognition, 112 (1):21-54.
7. W. Jassem. 2003. Illustrations of the IPA: Polish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33 (1):103-107.
8. M. Johnson. 2008. Unsupervised word segmentation for Sesotho using adaptor grammars. In Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology, pages 20-27. Data available online from http://childes. psy. cmu. edu/derived/sesotho. zip.
9. B. MacWhinney. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Lawrence Elbraum Associates.
10. S. Peperkamp, R. Le Calvez, J. P. Nadal, and E. Dupoux. 2006. The acquisition of allophonic rules: statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition, 101 (3):B31-B41.
11. M. Steffen-Batogowa. 1975. Automatyzacja transkrypcji fonematycznej tekstów polskich [Automatic phonemic transcription of Polish texts]. Pánstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
12. A. Venkataraman. 2001. A statistical model for word discovery in transcribed speech. Computational Linguistics, 27 (3):351-372.
13. R. M. Weist and K. Witkowska-Stadnik. 1986. Basic relations in child language and the word order myth. International Journal of Psychology, 21:363-381.
14. R. M. Weist, H. Wysocka, K. Witkowska-Stadnik, E. Buczowska, and E. Konieczna. 1984. The defective tense hypothesis: on the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language, 11:347-374. Data available online from http://childes. psy. cmu. edu/data/Slavic/Polish/Weist. zip.