Can breast nipple fluid collected with automated aspiration and preserved in based-liquid solution improve the cytological samples?

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 276-280

  Filassi, José Roberto ^a   Zonta, Marco Antonio ^c   Trinconi, Angela ^a   Calvagno, Daniele ^a   Velame De Oliveira, Fernada ^c   Ricci, Marcos Desidério ^a   Baracat, Edmund ^b,d   Longatto Filho, Adhemar ^a,e,f,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UFG   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d IN CITO Citologia Diagnóstica Lab   (Brazil)

^e BARRETOS CANCER HOSPITAL   (Brazil)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast cytopathology; Breast nipple fluid; Liquid based cytology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; AUTOMATION ASPIRATION; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISCHARGE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CELLULAR PARAMETERS; CELLULARITY; CYTOLOGY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LACTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NIPPLE; NIPPLE PIERCING; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 84876788806     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000348340     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Martins E, Freitas-Junior R, Curado MP, Freitas NM, De Oliveira JC, Silva CM: Temporal evolution of breast cancer stages in a population-based cancer registry in the Brazilian central region. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2009; 31: 219-223.
2. Mauad EC, Nicolau SM, Moreira LF, Haikel RL Jr, Longatto-Filho A, Baracat EC: Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance. Rural Remote Health 2009; 9: 1241.
3. Caleffi M, Ribeiro RA, Duarte Filho DL, Ashton-Prolla P, Bedin AJ Jr, Skonieski GP, Zignani JM, Giacomazzi J, Franco LR, Graudenz M, Pohlmann P, Fernandes JG, Kivitz P, Weber B: A model to optimize public health care and downstage breast cancer in limitedresource populations in southern Brazil (Porto Alegre Breast Health Intervention Cohort). BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 83.
4. Rodriguez-Cuevas S, Guisa-Hohenstein F, Labastida-Almendaro S: First breast cancer mammography screening program in Mexico: initial results 2005-2006. Breast J 2009; 15: 623-631.
5. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D: Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 671-679.
6. Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS: Histological and molecular types of breast cancer: is there a unifying taxonomy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009; 6: 718-730.
7. Abdel-Fatah TM, Powe DG, Hodi Z, Reis-Filho JS, Lee AH, Ellis IO: Morphologic and molecular evolutionary pathways of low nuclear grade invasive breast cancers and their putative precursor lesions: further evidence to support the concept of low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32: 513-523.
8. Vaughan A, Crowe JP, Brainard J, Dawson A, Kim J, Dietz JR: Mammary ductoscopy and ductal washings for the evaluation of patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J 2009; 15: 254-260.
9. Masood S, Khalbuss WE: Nipple fluid cytology. Clin Lab Med 2005; 25: 787-794.
10. Beechey-Newman N, Kulkarni D, Kothari A, D'Arrlgo C, Culora G, Hamed H, Fentiman I: Breast duct microendoscopy in nipple discharge: microbrush improves cytology. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1648-1651.
11. Loud JT, Beckjord EB, Nichols K, Peters J, Giusti R, Greene MH: Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer. BMC Womens Health 2009; 9: 20.
12. Tondre J, Nejad M, Casano A, Mills D, Love S: Technical enhancements to breast ductal lavage. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 2734-2738.
13. Proctor KA, Rowe LR, Bentz JS: Cytologic features of nipple aspirate fluid using an automated non-invasive collection device: a prospective observational study. BMC Womens Health 2005; 5: 10.
14. King EB, Chew KL, Petrakis NL, Ernster VL: Nipple aspirate cytology for the study of breast cancer precursors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1983; 71: 1115-1121.
15. Elsheikh TM: Does the new automated 'HALO' nipple aspiration fluid system really deliver as promised? The answer is 'No, but.': a literature review of the role of breast fluid cytology in cancer risk assessment. Diagn Cytopathol 2009; 37: 699-704.
16. Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, King EB, et al: Breast cancer incidence in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 130-141.
17. Sauter ER: Analysis of nipple aspirate fluid for diagnosis of breast cancer: an alternative to invasive biopsy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2005; 5: 873-881.
18. Schmitt FC, Longatto-Filho A, Valent A, Vielh P: Molecular techniques in cytopathology practice. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 258-267.
19. Filassi JR, Ricci MD, Trinconi AF, Calvano DC, Pompei Lde M, Longatto Filho A, Baracat EC: Assessment of pain sensitivity and factors involved in the quality of the sample fluid cytologic papillary: preliminary results from the use of automated collection (in Portuguese). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2010; 32: 491-496.