Structure-driven lexicalist generation

24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2027-2042

  Narayan, Shashi ^a   Gardent, Claire ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^b LORIA   (France)

Author keywords

Generation; Surface realization; Tree adjoining grammar

Indexed keywords

GENERATION; INPUT DATAS; NOVEL ALGORITHM; PROCESSING TIME; SEARCH SPACES; TOPDOWN; TREE ADJOINING GRAMMARS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICS; TREES;

EID: 84876786628     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bangalore, S. and Joshi, A. K. (1999). Supertagging: An approach to almost parsing. Computational Linguistics, 25(2):237-265.
2. Bangalore, S. and Rambow, O. (2000). Using TAGs, a tree model and a language model for generation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+5), Paris, France.
3. Belz, A., White, M., Espinosa, D., Kow, E., Hogan, D., and Stent, A. (2011). The first surface realisation shared task: Overview and evaluation results. In Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG), Nancy, France.
4. Bohnet, B., Mille, S., Favre, B., and Wanner, L. (2011). : From deep representation to surface. In Proceedings of the Generation Challenges Session at the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 232-235, Nancy, France. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Bonfante, G., Guillaume, B., and Perrier, G. (2004). Polarization and abstraction of grammatical formalisms as methods for lexical disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Geneva, Switzerland.
6. Carroll, J., Copestake, A., Flickinger, D., and Paznański, V. (1999). An efficient chart generator for (semi-)lexicalist grammars. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 86-95, Toulouse, France.
7. Carroll, J. and Oepen, S. (2005). High efficiency realization for a wide-coverage unification grammar. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP), Jeju Island, Korea.
8. Copestake, A., Lascarides, A., and Flickinger, D. (2001). An algebra for semantic construction in constraint-based grammars. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse, France.
9. Espinosa, D., Rajkumar, R., White, M., and Berleant, S. (2010). Further meta-evaluation of broad-coverage surface realization. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on EmpiricalMethods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 564-574, Cambridge, MA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Espinosa, D., White, M., and Mehay, D. (2008). Hypertagging: Supertagging for surface realization with CCG. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL): Human Language Technologies (HLT), pages 183-191, Columbus, Ohio. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Gardent, C. and Kow, E. (2005). Generating and selecting grammatical paraphrases. In Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG), Aberdeen, Scotland.
12. Gardent, C. and Kow, E. (2007). A symbolic approach to near-deterministic surface realisation using tree adjoining grammar. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 328-335, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. 2041.
13. Gardent, C. and Perez-Beltrachini, L. (2010). RTG based surface realisation for TAG. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 367-375, Beijing, China.
14. Guo, Y., Hogan, D., and van Genabith, J. (2011). Dcu at generation challenges 2011 surface realisation track. In Proceedings of the Generation Challenges Session at the 13th EuropeanWorkshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 227-229, Nancy, France. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Joshi, A. K. and Schabes, Y. (1996). Tree-adjoining grammars. Handbook of Formal Languages and Automata.
16. Koller, A. and Striegnitz, K. (2002). Generation as dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL), Philadelphia.
17. Narayan, S. (2011). RTG based surface realisation from dependency representations. Master's thesis, University of Nancy 2 and University of Malta. Erasmus Mundus Master "Language and Communication Technology".
18. Sarkar, A. and Joshi, A. K. (1996). Coordination in tree adjoining grammars: Formalization and implementation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 610-615.
19. Schmitz, S. and Roux, J. L. (2008). Feature unification in TAG derivation trees. In Proceedings of the 9th InternationalWorkshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms, Tubingen, Germany.
20. Shieber, S. (1993). The problem of logical form equivalence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1):179-190.
21. Shieber, S. M., Noord, G. V., Pereira, F. C. N., and Moore, R. C. (1990). Semantic-head-driven generation. Computational Linguistics, 16.
22. Stent, A. (2011). Att-0: Submission to generation challenges 2011 surface realization shared task. In Proceedings of the Generation Challenges Session at the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 230-231, Nancy, France. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. The XTAG Research Group (2001). A lexicalised tree adjoining grammar for english. Technical report, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvannia.
24. Vijay-Shanker, K. and Joshi, A. (1988). Feature structures based tree adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary.
25. White, M. (2004). Reining in CCG chart realization. In Proceedings of the third International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG), pages 182-191, Brighton, UK.
26. White, M. (2006). Efficient realization of coordinate structures in combinatory categorial grammar. Research on Language and Computation, 4(1):39-75.