How to balance sustainability and profitability in technology organizations: An ambidextrous perspective

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 366-385

  Du, Wenyu Derek ^a   Pan, Shan Ling ^a   Zuo, Meiyun ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b RENMIN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

ambidexterity; case study; engineering management; green IT; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

AMBIDEXTERITY; COLLECTIVE ACTION; ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT; GREEN IT; ITERATIVE DEVELOPMENT; SUPPLIER NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANIES; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS;

PLANNING; PROFITABILITY; RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84876762144     PISSN: 00189391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2012.2206113     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. P. S. Adler, B. Goldoftas, and D. I. Levine, "Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system," Org. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43-68, 1999.
2. D. G. Ancona, "Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 334-365, 1990.
3. D. G. Ancona and D. F. Caldwell, "Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams," Admin. Sci. Quart., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 634-665, 1992.
4. J. Andreoni, W. Harbaugh, and L. Vesterlund, "The carrot or the stick: Rewards, punishments, and cooperation," Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 893-902, 2003. (Pubitemid 38799580)
5. C. Andriopoulos andM.W. Lewis, "Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation," Org. Sci., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 696-717, 2009.
6. S. Benn and A. Martin, "Learning and change for sustainability reconsidered: A role for boundary objects," Acad. Manage. J. Learning Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 397-412, 2010.
7. M. J. Benner and M. L. Tushman, "Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited," Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 238-256, 2003. (Pubitemid 36446326)
8. G. A. Bigley and K. H. Roberts, "The incident command system: Highreliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1281-1299, 2001. (Pubitemid 33388270)
9. J. Birkinshaw and C. Gibson, "Building ambidexterity into an organization," MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 47-55, 2004. (Pubitemid 39047110)
10. P. Bourdieu and L. J. D. Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press, 1992.
11. G. H. Brundtland, Our Common Future. Tokyo, Japan:World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987.
12. Q. Cao, E. Gedajlovic, and H. Zhang, "Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects," Org. Sci., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 781-796, 2009.
13. Q. Cao, Z. Simsek, and H. Zhang, "Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity," J. Manage. Stud., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1272-1296, 2010.
14. P. Carlile, "A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development," Org. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 442-455, 2002.
15. P. R. Carlile, "Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework formanaging knowledge across boundaries," Org. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 555-568, 2004. (Pubitemid 39453864)
16. C. Chan, R. Hackney, S. Pan, and T. Chou, "Managing e-Government system implementation: A resource enactment perspective," Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 529-541, 2011.
17. China-Mobile, Green-We Are in Action. Beijing, China, 2010.
18. China-Mobile, Green Action Plan: System Science and Best Practice from China Mobile. Beijing, China: China Mach. Press, 2010.
19. V. Choudhury and R. Sabherwal, "Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 291-314, 2003. (Pubitemid 37179667)
20. C. M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Bus. Press, 1997.
21. P. J. DiMaggio, "Interest and agency in institutional theory," in Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Mountlake Terrac, MA: Ballinger, 1988, pp. 3-21.
22. M. J. Dollinger, "Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 351-368, 1984.
23. W. Du and S. L. Pan, "Boundary spanning by design: Insights from a vendor perspective," presented at the Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., Saint Louis, MI, 2010.
24. K. Eisenhardt and J. Martin, "Dynamic capabilities: What are they?," Strategic Manage. J., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1105-1121, 2000.
25. K. M. Eisenhardt, "Agency theory: An assessment and review," Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57-74, 1989.
26. K. M. Eisenhardt, N. R. Furr, and C. B. Bingham, "CROSSROADS- microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments," Org. Sci., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1263-1273, 2010.
27. M. J. Epstein and H. B. Leonard, Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental And Economic Impacts. Sheffield, U.K.: Greenleaf Sheffield, 2008.
28. M. L. Fennell and J. A. Alexander, "Organizational boundary spanning in institutional environments," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 456-476, 1987.
29. R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy, and V. Sambamurthy, "Emergent by design: Performance and transformation at Infosys Technologies," Org. Sci., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 277-286, 2006. (Pubitemid 43515289)
30. S. Ghoshal and C. A. Bartlett, The Individualized Corporation. New York: Harper Collins, 1997.
31. C. B. Gibson and J. Birkinshaw, "The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 209-226, 2004. (Pubitemid 38845937)
32. C. G. Gilbert, "Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist?," Org. Sci., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 150-167, 2006. (Pubitemid 43312431)
33. T. N. Gladwin, J. J. Kennelly, and T. S. Krause, "Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research," Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 874-907, 1995. (Pubitemid 126003237)
34. A. K. Gupta, K. G. Smith, and C. E. Shalley, "The interplay between exploration and exploitation," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 693-706, 2006. (Pubitemid 44453114)
35. H. M. Haugh and A. Talwar, "How do corporations embed sustainability across the organization?," The Acad. Manage. Learning Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 384-396, 2010.
36. Z. L. He and P. K. Wong, "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis," Org. Sci., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 481-494, 2004.
37. P. Hedstrom, Dissecting the Social. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.
38. P. Hinds and D. E. Bailey, "Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams," Org. Sci., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 615-632, 2003.
39. IBM, Enterprise of the Future: Global CEO Study. Somers NY: IBM Corp., 2008.
40. G. Im and A. Rai, "Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships," Manage. Sci., vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1281-1296, 2008.
41. J. J. P. Jansen, G. George, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership," J. Manage. Studies, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 982-1007, 2008.
42. J. J. P. Jansen, M. P. Tempelaar, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms," Org. Sci., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 797-811, 2009.
43. R. Katz andM. Tushman, "A longitudinal study of the effects of boundary spanning supervision on turnover and promotion in research and development," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 437-456, 1983.
44. L. Kirsch, "Portfolios of control modes and IS project management," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 215-239, 1997.
45. H. Klein andM.Myers, "A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems," MIS Quart., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 67-93, 1999.
46. B.Kogut andU. Zander, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology," Org. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 383-397, 1992.
47. D. Lavie, "Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change," Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 153-174, 2006. (Pubitemid 43133452)
48. N. Levina and A. Kane, "Onshore immigrant managers as boundary spanners on offshored projects: Partners or bosses," presented at the Ind. Studies Assoc. Annu. Conf., Chicago, IL, 2009.
49. N. Levina and E. Vaast, "The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems," MIS Quart., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 335-363, 2005. (Pubitemid 46063149)
50. N. Levina and E. Vaast, "Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration," MIS Quart., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 307-332, 2008. (Pubitemid 351762935)
51. M. H. Lubatkin, Z. Simsek, Y. Ling, and J. F. Veiga, "Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration," J. Manage., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 646-672, 2006. (Pubitemid 44349935)
52. Y. Luo, "A coopetition perspective of global competition," J. World Bus., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 129-144, 2007.
53. J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning," Org. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71-87, 1991.
54. C. Markides and D. Oyon, "What to do against disruptive business models (when and how to play two games at once)," MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 25-32, 2010.
55. R. Mayasandra, S. Pan, and D. Leidner, "Examining the strategic alignment and implementation success of a KMS: A subculture based multi-level analysis," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1-23, 2010.
56. M.W. McCarter, J. T.Mahoney, and G. B. Northcraft, "Testing the waters: Using collective real options to manage the social dilemma of strategic alliances," Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 621-640, 2011.
57. M. Meeks and R. J. C. Chen, "Can walmart integrate values with value? From sustainability to sustainable business," J. Sustainable Develop., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 62-66, 2011.
58. N. P. Melville, "Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability," MIS Quart., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2010.
59. A. Metiu, "Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups," Org. Sci., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 418-435, 2006. (Pubitemid 44167187)
60. Moller-Maersk, "The A.P.Moller-Maersk Group's Sustainability Report 2011," London, U.K., 2011.
61. R. Montealegre, "A process model of capability development: Lessons from the electronic commerce strategy at Bolsa de Valores de Guayaquil," Org. Sci., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 514-531, 2002.
62. C. A. O'Reilly andM. L. Tushman, "Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma," Res. Org. Behav., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 185-206, 2008.
63. C. A. O'Reilly and M. L. Tushman, "The ambidextrous organization," Harvard Bus. Rev., vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 74-80, 2004.
64. J. M. Olsen, Moller-Maersk Sees Profits Drop,Warns On Outlook. New York: Associated Press, 2012.
65. S. L. Pan, S. Newell, J. C. M. Huang, and R. Galliers, "Overcoming knowledge management challenges during ERPimplementation: The need to share and integrate different types of knowledge?," J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 404-419, 2007. (Pubitemid 46383527)
66. S. L. Pan, G. Pan, A. J. W. Chen, and M. H. Hsieh, "The dynamics of implementing and managing modularity of organizational routines during capability development: Insights from a process model," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 800-813, Nov. 2007. (Pubitemid 350123912)
67. S. L. Pan, G. Pan, andD. Leidner, "Crisis response information networks," J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 31-56, 2012.
68. S. L. Pan and B. C. C. Tan, "Demystifying case research: A structuredpragmatic-situational (SPS) approach for conducting case research," Inf. Org., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 161-176, 2011.
69. M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, "Strategy and society," Harvard Bus. Rev., vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 78-92, 2006.
70. S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw, G. Probst, and M. L. Tushman, "Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance," Org. Sci., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 685-695, 2009.
71. M. N. Ravishankar and S. L. Pan, "The influence of organizationalidentification on organizationalknowledgemanagement (KM)," Omega, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 221-234, 2008.
72. J. W. Rivkin and N. Siggelkow, "Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements organizational design," Manage. Sci., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 290-311, 2003.
73. D. N. Robinson, "Wisdom through the ages," in Wisdom: Its Nature, Origins, and Development. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990, pp. 13-24.
74. V. Sambamurthy and R. W. Zmud, "Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies," MIS Quart., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 261-290, 1999.
75. M. Sarkees and J. Hulland, "Innovation and Efficiency: It is possible to have it all," Bus. Horizons, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 45-55, 2009.
76. J. Sarkis, Greening the Supply Chain. New York: Springer, 2006, p. 407.
77. J. Sarkis, "Supply chain management and environmentally conscious design and manufacturing," Int. J. Environ. Conscious Design Manuf., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 43-52, 1995.
78. J. Sarkis and A. Rasheed, "Greening the manufacturing function," Bus. Horizons, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 17-27, 1995.
79. J. Schepers and M. Wetzels, "A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects," Inf. Manage., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 90-103, 2007. (Pubitemid 46028956)
80. L. E. Sekerka and D. Stimel, "How durable is sustainable enterprise? Ecological sustainability meets the reality of tough economic times," Bus. Horizons, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 115-124, 2010.
81. C. L. Sia, B. C. Y. Tan, and K. K.Wei, "Group polarization and computermediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 70-90, 2002.
82. N. Siggelkow, "Persuasion with case studies," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 20-24, 2007.
83. Z. Simsek, "Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding," J. Manage. Stud., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 597-624, 2009.
84. W. K. Smith and M. L. Tushman, "Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams," Org. Sci., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 522-536, 2005. (Pubitemid 41677005)
85. R. Sroufe and J. Sarkis, Eds., Strategic Sustainability: The State of the Art in Corporate Environmental Management Systems, Sheffield, UK: Greenleef Publishing, 2007, p. 272.
86. K. Starkey and A. Crane, "Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic," Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 220-237, 2003. (Pubitemid 36446325)
87. A. Strauss and J. M. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
88. B. C. C. Tan, S. L. Pan, and R. Hackney, "The strategic implications of web technologies: A process model of how web technologies enhance organizational performance," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 181-197, May 2010.
89. A. Taylor and C. E. Helfat, "Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity," Org. Sci., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 718-739, 2009.
90. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Manage. J., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997. (Pubitemid 127467809)
91. A. Tiwana, "Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls," J. Manage. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 87-126, 2010.
92. B. Uzzi, "The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect," Amer. Sociol. Rev., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 674-698, 1996.
93. H.W. Volberda, "Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments," Org. Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 359-374, 1996.
94. Walmart, "Global Sustainability Report 2010 Progress Update," Bentonville, AR, 2010.
95. G.Walsham, "Interpretive case studies in IS research:Nature andmethod," Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 74-81, 1995.
96. R. T. Watson, M. C. Boudreau, and A. J. Chen, "Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community," MIS Quart., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 23-38, 2010.
97. R. T. Watson, M. C. Boudreau, A. J. Chen, and H. H. Seṕulveda, "Green projects: An information drives analysis of four cases," J. Strat. Inf. Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 55-62, 2010.
98. O. E. Williamson, "The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach," Amer. J. Sociol., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 548-577, 1981.
99. WorldWideFund, Low Carbon Business Leadership: Opportunities of the Future Business Development. Beijing, China: CITIC Publishing Group, 2010.
100. Y. Xue, H. Liang, and W. R. Boulton, "Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: The impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context," MIS Quart., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 67-96, 2008. (Pubitemid 351378750)
101. T. Yang, Y. Hu, P. Zhang, and P. Dennis, Low Carbon Telecommunication Solution in China: Current Reduction and Future Potential. Beijing, China: China Mobile, 2009.