Temporal granger causality and the dynamics relationship between real tourism receipts, real income and real exchange rates in Malaysia

International Journal of Tourism Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 272-284

  Tang, Chor Foon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Causality; Exchange rates; Malaysia; Persistence profile; Tourism led growth

Indexed keywords

ERROR CORRECTION; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INCOME; REAL EXCHANGE RATE; TOURISM;

MALAYSIA;

EID: 84876734661     PISSN: 10992340     EISSN: 15221970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jtr.1869     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Balaguer J, Cantavella-Jorda M. 2002. Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: the Spanish case. Applied Economics 34(7): 877-884.
2. Belloumi M. 2010. The relationship between tourism receipts, real effective exchange rate and economic growth in Tunisia. International Journal of Tourism Research 12(5): 550-560.
3. Clancy MJ. 1999. Tourism and development: Evidence from Mexico. Annals of Tourism Research 26(1): 1-20.
4. Deaton A. 1995. Growth and saving: What do we know, what do we need to know, and what might we learn? Manuscript, Princeton University.
5. Elkan W. 1975. The relation between tourism and employment in Kenya and Tanzania. Journal of Development Studies 11(2): 123-130.
6. Granger CWJ, Newbold P. 1974. Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2(2): 111-120.
7. Gunduz L, Hatemi-J A. 2005. Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis valid for Turkey? Applied Economics Letters 12(8): 499-504.
8. Katircioǧlu ST. 2009. Revisiting the tourism-led growth hypothesis for Turkey using the bounds test and Johansen approach for cointegration. Tourism Management 30(1): 17-20.
9. Katircioǧlu ST. 2010. Testing the tourism-led growth hypothesis for Singapore - an empirical investigation from bounds test to cointegration and Granger causality tests. Tourism Economics 16(4): 1095-1101.
10. Kremers JJM, Ericsson NR, Dolado JJ. 1992. The power of cointegration tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54(3): 325-348.
11. Lau PH, Hu SS, Oh SL. 2009. Tourist arrivals and economic growth in Sarawak. Sarawak Development Journal 9: 36-45.
12. Lean HH, Smyth R. 2009. Asian financial crisis, avian flu and terrorist threats: are shock to Malaysian tourist arrivals permanent or transitory? Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 14(3): 301-321.
13. Lean HH, Tang CF. 2010. Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis stable for Malaysia? a note. International Journal of Tourism Research 12(4): 375-378.
14. Lee CG, Hung WT. 2010. Tourism, health and income in Singapore. International Journal of Tourism Research 12(4): 355-359.
15. Lütkepohl H. 1982. Non-causality due to omitted variables. Journal of Econometrics 19(2-3): 367-378.
16. Lütkepohl H. 1994. Interpretation of cointegration relations - comments on estimating systems of trending variables by Søren Johansen. Econometric Reviews 13(3): 391-394.
17. Narayan PK. 2005. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics 37(17): 1979-1990.
18. Narayan PK, Popp S. 2010. A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. Journal of Applied Statistics 37(9): 1425-1438.
19. Narayan PK, Smyth R. 2004. The relationship between real exchange rate and balance of payments: empirical evidence for China from cointegration and causality testing. Applied Economics Letters 11(5): 287-291.
20. Narayan PK, Narayan S, Prasad A, Prasad BC. 2010. Tourism and economic growth: a panel data analysis for Pacific Island countries. Tourism Economics 16(1): 169-183.
21. Oh CO. 2005. The contribution of tourism development to economic growth in the Korean economy. Tourism Management 26(1): 39-44.
22. Perman R. 1991. Cointegration: An introduction to the literature. Journal of Economic Studies 18(3): 3-30.
23. Perron P. 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6): 1361-1401.
24. Pesaran MH, Shin Y. 1996. Cointegration and speed of convergence to equilibrium. Journal of Econometrics 71(1-2): 117-143.
25. Pesaran MH, Shin Y. 1999. An autoregressive distributed-led modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Strom S (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
26. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16(3): 289-326.
27. Phillips PCB, Hansen BE. 1990. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies 57(1): 99-125.
28. Sinclair MT. 1998. Tourism and economic development: A survey. Journal of Development Studies 34(5): 1-51.
29. Solow RM. 2001. Applying growth theory across countries. World Bank Economic Review 15(2): 283-288.
30. Stock JH, Watson MW. 1993. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61(4): 783-820.
31. Tang CF. 2011a. Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis valid for Malaysia? a view from disaggregated tourism markets. International Journal of Tourism Research 13(1): 97-101.
32. Tang CF. 2011b. Old wine in new bottles: Are Malaysia's tourism markets converging? Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 16(3): 263-272.
33. Tang CF. 2011c. An exploration of dynamic relationship between tourist arrivals, inflation, unemployment and crime rates in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Economics 38(1): 50-69.
34. Tang CH, Jang SC. 2009. The tourism-economy causality in the United States: a sub-industry level examination. Tourism Management 30(4): 553-558.
35. World Tourism Organisation 2010. Recovery confirmed, but growth remains uneven. UNWTO World Tourism Barometer 8(2): 1-63.
36. Zain Y. 2005. Malaysia second most visited. New Straits Times 24 December: 22.
37. Zivot E, Andrews DWK. 1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10(3): 251-270.