Reflection of the structural distinctions of source-different humic substances on organic fouling behaviors of SWRO membranes

Desalination

Volumn 318, Issue , 2013, Pages 72-78

  Hung, Phan Vu Xuan ^a   Oh, Byoung Soo ^b   Tung, Bui Xuan ^b   Oh, Sang Geun ^b   Kim, Kyung Su ^b   Kim, Sung Jo ^a   Moon, Seung Hyeon ^b   Kim, In S ^b   Jang, Am ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

^c Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Desalination; Fouling; Humic substances; Seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO)

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE MOLECULAR WEIGHT; DESALINATION PLANT; FOULING MECHANISMS; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS; PROTON DISTRIBUTIONS; SEAWATER REVERSE OSMOSIS; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CONTACT ANGLE; DESALINATION; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; MEMBRANES; ORGANIC ACIDS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SEAWATER; WATER FILTRATION;

FOULING;

DESALINATION; FOULING; FTIR SPECTROSCOPY; HUMIC ACID; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; SEAWATER; WASTE FACILITY;

EID: 84876727533     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Darton F.M., PermaCare E.G. A Statistical Review of 150 Membrane Autopsies. Technical paper, Derwent Water Services Limited 2002.
2. Dalvi A.G.I., Al-Rasheed R., Javeed M.A. Studies on organic foulants in the seawater feed of reverse osmosis plants of SWCC. Desalination 2000, 132:217-232.
3. Greenlee L.F., Lawler D.F., Freeman B.D., Marrot B., Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 2009, 43:2317-2348.
4. Kumar M., Adham S.S., Pearce W.R. Investigation of seawater reverse osmosis fouling and its relationship to pretreatment type. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2037-2044.
5. Shon H.K., Vigneswaran S., Cho J. Comparison of physico-chemical pretreatment methods to seawater reverse osmosis: detailed analyses of molecular weight distribution of organic matter in initial stage. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:151-158.
6. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.N., Leckie J.O. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid-effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 290:86-94.
7. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.N., Leckie J.O. The role of foulant-foulant electrostatic interaction on limiting flux for RO and NF membranes during humic acid fouling-theoretical basis, experimental evidence, and AFM interaction force measurement. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:526-532.
8. Yu Y., Lee S., Hong S. Effect of solution chemistry on organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes in seawater desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 351:205-213.
9. Esteves V.I., Otero M., Duarte A.C. Comparative characterization of humic substances from the open ocean, estuarine water and fresh water. Org. Geochem. 2009, 40:942-950.
10. Harvey G.R., Boran D.A., Chesal L.A., Tokar J.M. The structure of marine fulvic and humic acids. Mar. Chem. 1983, 12:119-132.
11. Malcolm R.L. The uniqueness of humic substances in each of soil, stream and marine environments. Anal. Chim. Acta 1990, 232:19-30.
12. Malcolm R.L., MacCarthy P. Limitations in the use of commercial humic acids in water and soil research. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1986, 20:904-911.
13. Repeta D.J., Quan T.M., Aluwihare L.I., Accardi A. Chemical characterization of high molecular weight dissolved organic matter in fresh and marine waters. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2002, 66:955-962.
14. Leenheer J.A. Systematic approaches to comprehensive analyses of natural organic matter. Ann. Environ. Sci. 2009, 3:1-130.
15. Leenheer J.A., Noyes T.I., Rostad C.E., Davisson M.L. Characterization and origin of polar dissolved organic matter from the Great Salt Lake. Biogeochemistry 2004, 69:125-141.
16. 1H NMR spectra of humic and fulvic acids. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in environmental chemistry 1997, 295. Oxford University Press. M.A. Nanny, R.A. Minear, J.A. Leenheer (Eds.).
17. Hung P.V.X., Cho S.H., Moon S.H. Prediction of boron transport through seawater reverse osmosis membranes using solution-diffusion model. Desalination 2009, 247:33-44.
18. Malcolm R. Factors to be considered in the isolation and characterization of aquatic humic substances. Humic Substances in the Aquatic and Terrestrial Environment 1991, 7-36. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. B. Allard, H. Borén, A. Grimvall (Eds.).
19. Hung P.V.X., Cho S.-H., Woo J.-J., Moon S.-H. Behaviors of commercialized seawater reverse osmosis membranes under harsh organic fouling conditions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010, 15:48-53.
20. Leenheer J.A., Rostad C.E., Gates P.M., Furlong E.T., Ferrer I. Molecular resolution and fragmentation of fulvic acid by electrospray ionization/multistage tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73:1461-1471.
21. Reiller P., Amekraz B., Moulin C. Sorption of Aldrich humic acid onto hematite: insights into fractionation phenomena by electrospray ionization with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2235-2241.
22. Koprivnjak J.F., Pfromm P.H., Ingall E., Vetter T.A., Schmitt-Kopplin P., Hertkorn N., Frommberger M., Knicker H., Perdue E.M. Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of marine dissolved organic matter isolated using coupled reverse osmosis-electrodialysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2009, 73:4215-4231.