Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 759-765

  Fu, Dong ^a   Li, Guodong ^a   Chen, Kai ^a   Zhao, Yiqiong ^a   Hua, Yingqi ^a   Cai, Zhengdong ^a  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

High tibial osteotomy (HTO); Meta analysis; Osteoarthritis; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; META ANALYSIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; TIBIA OSTEOTOMY; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876723781     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.010     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Coventry M.B. Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1965, 47:984.
2. De M.P., Maquet P., Simonet J. Biomechanical consideration of arthrosis of the knee. Some remarks on radiographs. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1963, 30:775.
3. Maqut P. A biomechanical treatment of femoro-patellar arthrosis: advancement of patellar tendon. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1963, 30:779.
4. Insall J., Aglietti P. A 5- to 7-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980, 62:1329.
5. Kozinn S.C., Scott R.D. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989, 71-A:145.
6. Carr A., Keyes G., Miller R., et al. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop 1993, 295:205.
7. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., Wang G.J. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:674.
8. Handoll H.H., Gillespie W.J., Gillespie L.D., et al. Moving towards evidence-based healthcare for musculoskeletal injuries: featuring the work of the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group. J R Soc Promot Health 2007, 127:168.
9. Cochran W.G. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954, 10:101.
10. Yim J.H., Song E.K., Seo H.Y., et al. Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. J Arthroplasty 2012, [Epub ahead of print].
11. Takeuchi R., Umemoto Y., Aratake M., et al. A mid term comparison of open wedge high tibial osteotomy vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Orthop Surg Res 2010, 5:65.
12. Stukenbor C., Wirth C.J., Lazovic D., et al. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 710-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee 2001, 8:187.
13. Jefferson R.J., Whittle M.W. Biomechanical assessment of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, total condylar arthroplasty and tibial osteotomy. Clin Biomech 1989, 4(4):232.
14. Borjesson M., Weidenhielm L., Mattsson E., et al. Gait and clinical measurements in patients with knee osteoarthritis after surgery: a prospective 5-year follow-up study. Knee 2005, 12:121.
15. Weale A.E., Newman J.H. Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 302:134.
16. Ivarsson I., Gillquist J. Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 266:139.
17. Broughton N.S., Newman J.H., Baily R.A. Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5-10 years' follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986, 68(3):447.
18. Dahl A.W., Robertsson O., Lidgren L. Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients. A Swedish register study. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(2):161.
19. Karpman R.R., Volz R.G. Osteotomy versus unicompartmental prosthetic replacement in the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Orthopedics 1982, 5(8):989.
20. Dettoni F., Maistrelli G.L., Rossi P., et al. UKA versus HTO: clinical results at short term follow up 2008.
21. Ledingham J., Regan M., Jones A., et al. Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital. Ann Rheum Dis 1993, 52:520.
22. Chang W., Bennett C.H. High tibial osteotomy and related surgeries. Curr Opin Orthop 2005, 16:77.
23. Pagnano M.W., Clarke H.D., Jacofsky D.J., et al. Surgical treatment of the middle-aged patient with arthritic knees. Instr Course Lect 2005, 54:251.
24. Weidenhielm L., Olsson E., Mattsson E., et al. Improvement in gait one year after surgery for knee osteoarthrosis: a comparison between high tibial osteotomy and prosthetic replacement in a prospective randomized study. Scand J Rehabil Med 1993, 25(1):25.
25. Walsh M., Woodhouse L.J., Thomas S.G., et al. Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with control subjects. Phys Ther 1998, 78(3):248.
26. Andriacchi T., Galante J., Fermier R. The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1982, 64(9):1328.
27. Gill T., Schemitsch E.H., Brick G.W., et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 321:10.
28. Barrett W.P., Scott R.D. Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987, 69:1328.
29. Spahn G., Hofmann G.O., Engelhardt L.V., et al. The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011, [Epub ahead of print].
30. Akizuki S., Shibakawa A., Takizawa T., et al. The long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy: a ten- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:592.
31. Niemeyer P., Koestler W., Kaehny C., et al. Two-year results of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with fixation by medial plate fixator for medial compartment arthritis with varus malalignment of the knee. Arthroscopy 2008, 24:796.
32. Jacobi M., Wahl P., Jakob R.P. Avoiding intraoperative complications in open-wedge high tibial valgus osteotomy: technical advancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010, 18:200.
33. Miller B.S., Downie B., McDonough E.B., et al. Complications after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 2009, 25:639.
34. Rodner C.M., Adams D.J., Diaz-Doran V., et al. Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy and the sagittal plane: the effect of increasing tibial slope on tibiofemoral contact pressure. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34:1431.
35. Flecher X., Parratte S., Aubaniac J.M., et al. A 12-28-year follow-up study of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:91.
36. Gstottner M., Pedross F., Liebensteiner M., et al. Long-term outcome after high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008, 128(1):111.
37. Aglietti P., Rinonapoli E., Stringa G., et al. Tibial osteotomy for the varus osteoarthritic knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983, 176:239.
38. Rudan J.F., Simurda M.A. High tibial osteotomy. A prospective clinical and roentgenographic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 255:251.
39. Amendola A., Bonasia D.E. Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 2010, 34(2):155.
40. Trieb K., Grohs J., Hanslik-schnabel B., et al. Age predicts outcome of high-tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006, 14(2):149.
41. Dettoni F., Bonasia D.E., Castoldi F., et al. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature. Owa Orthop J 2010, 30:131.
42. Borus T., Thornhill T. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008, 16(1):9.
43. Cartier P., Sanouiller J.L., Grelsamer R.P. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:782.
44. Koskinen E., Paavolainen P., Eskelinen A., et al. Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007, 78:128.