Achieving and maintaining Hg oxidation performance through SCR catalyst selection and management

Air and Waste Management Association - Power Plant Air Pollutant Control "MEGA" Symposium 2012

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 622-642

  DiFrancesco, Chris E ^a   Bertole, Christopher J ^a   Freeman, Jeremy T ^a   Nochi, Katsumi ^b  

^a Cormetech Inc ^*  (United States)

^b MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATALYST ADDITION; CATALYST MANAGEMENT; DEACTIVATION RATE; DENOX ACTIVITIES; DURABILITY TESTING; ECONOMICAL METHODS; OXIDATION LEVEL; OXIDATION TESTS;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; CATALYST DEACTIVATION; DESIGN; FLUE GASES; POWER PLANTS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

OXIDATION;

EID: 84876714468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. C. Tyree, J. Allen, Determining AQCS Mercury Removal Co-Benefits, Power, July 1, 2010
2. S. Ghorishi, S. Renninger, G. Farthing, C. Teets, J. Neureuter, T. Hastings, C. DiFrancesco, Effects of SCR Catalyst and Wet FGD Additive on Speciation and Removal of Mercury within a Forced-Oxidized Limestone Scrubber, ICAC Clean Air Technologies and Strategies Conference 05, March 7-10, 2005
3. VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, Guideline for the Testing of DeNOx Catalytic Converters, VGB-R 302He, 2nd revised version
4. Cormetech internal data.
5. J. Quick, Utah Geological Survey; web-site: http://geology.utah.gov/emp/ mercury/index.htm