Quantitative assessment of microcirculation and diffusion in the bone marrow of osteoporotic rats using VCT, DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and histology

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 205-213

  Liu, Yifei ^a   Cao, Liji ^a   Hillengass, Jens ^a,b   Delorme, Stefan ^a   Schlewitz, Gudrun ^c,d   Govindarajan, Parameswari ^d   Schnettler, Reinhard ^c,d   Heiß, Christian ^c,d   Bäuerle, Tobias ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

^d JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

CT quantitative; MR diffusion perfusion; MR functional imaging; Osteoporosis; Skeletal axial appendicular

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; DIFFUSION; DISEASES; MICROCIRCULATION; PROTEINS; RATE CONSTANTS; RATS; SURGERY;

CT - QUANTITATIVE; FUNCTIONAL IMAGING; MR - DIFFUSION/PERFUSION; OSTEOPOROSIS; SKELETAL - AXIAL/APPENDICULAR;

BONE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HINDLIMB; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MICROCIRCULATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PELVIC GIRDLE; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; VASCULARIZATION;

ANIMALS; BONE MARROW; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HINDLIMB; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROCIRCULATION; OSTEOPOROSIS; PELVIC BONES; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876712278     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120508     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med 2003;9: 653-60
2. Griffith JF, Yeung DKW, Antonio GE, et al. Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology 2006;241: 831-8
3. Martinez P, Esbrit P, Rodrigo A, et al. Age-related changes in parathyroid hormone-related protein and vascular endothelial growth factor in human osteoblastic cells. Osteoporos Int 2002;13: 874-81
4. Griffith JF, Yeung DKW, Antonio GE, et al. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2005;236: 945-51
5. Wang YXJ, Zhang YF, Griffith JF, et al. Vertebral blood perfusion reduction associated with vertebral bone mineral density reduction: A dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI study in a rat orchiectomy model. J Mag Res Ima 2008;28: 1515-8
6. Bäuerle T, Merz M, Komljenovic D, et al. Drug-induced vessel remodeling in bone metastases as assessed by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and vessel size imaging: A longitudinal in vivo study. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16: 3215-25
7. Bäuerle T, Bartling S, Berger M, et al. Imaging anti-angiogenic treatment response with DCE-VCT, DCE-MRI and DWI in an animal model of breast cancer bone metastasis. Eur J Radiol 2010;73: 280-7
8. Bäuerle T, Komljenovic D, Merz M, et al. Cilengitide inhibits progression of experimental breast cancer bone metastases as imaged noninvasively using VCT, MRI and DCE-MRI in a longitudinal in vivo study. Int J Cancer 2011;128: 2453-62
9. Heiss C, Govindarajan P, Schlewitz G, et al. Induction of osteoporosis with its influence on osteoporotic determinants and their interrelationships in rats by DEXA. Med Sci Monit 2012;18:BR199-207
10. Kiessling F, Greschus S, Lichy MP, et al. Volumetric computed tomography (VCT): A new technology for noninvasive, high-resolution monitoring of tumor angiogenesis. Nat Med 2004;10: 1133-8
11. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104: 829-36
12. Kiessling F, Jugold M, Woenne EC, et al. Non-invasive assessment of vessel morphology and function in tumors by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2007;17: 2136-48
13. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15: 621-8
14. Herneth AM, Guccione S, Bednarski M. Apparent diffusion coefficient: A quantitative parameter for in vivo tumor characterization. Eur J Radiol 2003;45: 208-13
15. Biffar A, Schmidt GP, Sourbron S, et al. Quantitative analysis of vertebral bone marrow perfusion using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Initial results in osteoporotic patients with acute vertebral fracture. J Mag Res Ima 2011;33: 676-83
16. Zwick S, Brix G, Tofts PS, et al. Simulation-based comparison of two approaches frequently used for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2010;20: 432-44
17. Hillengass J, Bäuerle T, Bartl R, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging for non-invasive and quantitative monitoring of bone marrow infiltration in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease: A comparative study with histology. Brit J Haematol 2011;153: 721-8
18. Padhani AR, Koh DM, Collins DJ. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: Current status and research directions. Radiology 2011;261: 700-18
19. Andersen TL, Sondergaard TE, Skorzynska KE, et al. A physical mechanism for coupling bone resorption and formation in adult human bone. Am J Pathol 2009;174: 239-47
20. Bäuerle T, Hilbig H, Bartling S, et al. Bevacizumab inhibits breast cancer-induced osteolysis, surrounding soft tissue metastasis, and angiogenesis in rats as visualized by VCT and MRI. Neoplasia 2008;10:511-20