Vision of the body and the differentiation of perceived body side in touch

Cortex

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1340-1351

  Tamè, Luigi ^a,b,c   Farnè, Alessandro ^b,d   Pavani, Francesco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Body sides; Double simultaneous stimulation; Extinction; Touch; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; BODY SIDE; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; POSTURE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876709463     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alais D., Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 2004, 14(3):257-262.
2. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
3. Braun C., Hess H., Burkhardt M., Wühle A., Preissl H. The right hand knows what the left hand is feeling. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 162(3):366-373.
4. Craig J.C. Attending to two fingers: Two hands are better than one. Perception & Psychophysics 1985, 38(6):496-511.
5. Craig J.C., Green B.G., Rhodes R.P. Ipsilateral versus bilateral placement of a tactile vocoder display. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 1985, 77(3):1266-1268.
6. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
7. Evans P.M., Craig J.C. Tactile attention and the perception of moving tactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 49(4):355-364.
8. Evans P.M., Craig J.C., Rinker M.A. Perceptual processing of adjacent and nonadjacent tactile nontargets. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 52(5):571-581.
9. Folegatti A., de Vignemont F., Pavani F., Rossetti Y., Farnè A. Losing one's hand: Visual-proprioceptive conflict affects touch perception. PLoS One 2009, 4(9):e6920.
10. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science 2006, 10(1):14-23.
11. Haggard P., Serino A. Touch and the body. Neuroscience Biobehavioural Review 2010, 34(2):224-236.
12. Hamada Y., Suzuki R. Hand posture modulates neuronal interaction in the primary somatosensory cortex of humans. Clinical Neurophysiology 2003, 114(9):1689-1696.
13. Hamada Y., Suzuki R. Hand posture modulates cortical finger representation in SII. NeuroImage 2005, 25(3):708-717.
14. Harris J.A., Harris I.M., Diamond M.E. The topography of tactile working memory. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21(20):8262-8269.
15. Hegner Y.L., Saur R., Veit R., Butts R., Leiberg S., Grodd W., et al. BOLD adaptation in vibrotactile stimulation: Neural networks involved in frequency discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 97(1):264-271.
16. Hlushchuk Y., Hari R. Transient suppression of ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex during tactile finger stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(21):5819-5824.
17. Iwamura Y., Taoka M., Iriki A. Bilateral activity and callosal connections in the somatosensory cortex. The Neuroscientist 2001, 7(5):419-429.
18. Iwamura Y., Tanaka M., Iriki A., Taoka M., Toda T. Processing of tactile and kinesthetic signals from bilateral sides of the body in the postcentral gyrus of awake monkeys. Behavioural Brain Research 2002, 135(1-2):185-190.
19. Kennett S., Taylor-Clarke M., Haggard P. Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology 2001, 11(15):1188-1191.
20. Killackey H.P., Gould H.J., Cusick C.G., Pons T.P., Kaas J.H. The relation of corpus callosum connections to architectonic fields and body surface maps in sensorimotor cortex of New and Old World monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1983, 219(4):384-419.
21. Laskin S.E., Spencer A. Cutaneous masking. I. Psychophysical observations on interactions of multipoint stimuli in man. Journal of Neurophysiology 1979, 42(4):1048-1060.
22. Maldjian J.A., Gottschalk A., Patel R.S., Pincus D., Detre J.A., Alsop D.C. Mapping of secondary somatosensory cortex activation induced by vibrational stimulation: An fMRI study. Brain Research 1999, 824(2):291-295.
23. Marino B.F.M., Stucchi N., Nava E., Haggard P., Maravita A. Distorting the visual size of the hand affects hand pre-shaping during grasping. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202(2):499-505.
24. Medina J., Rapp B. Phantom tactile sensations modulated by body position. Current Biology 2008, 18(24):1937-1942.
25. Mirams L., Poliakoff E., Braun R.J., Lloyd D.M. Vision of the body increases interference on the somatic signal detection task. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202(4):787-794.
26. Moseley G.L., Olthof N., Venema A., Don S., Wijers M., Gallace A., et al. Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(35):13169-13173.
27. Moseley G.L., Parsons T.J., Spence C. Visual distortion of limb modulates the pain and swelling evoked by movement. Current Biology 2008, 18(22):R1047-R1048.
28. Newport R., Preston C. Pulling the finger off disrupts agency, embodiment and peripersonal space. Perception 2010, 39(9):1296-1298.
29. Pavani F., Galfano G. Self-attributed body-shadows modulate tactile attention. Cognition 2007, 104(1):73-88.
30. Pavani F., Zampini M. The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception 2007, 36(10):1547-1554.
31. Prablanc C., Echallier J.F., Jeannerod M., Komilis E. Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement. Biology Cybernetics 1979, 35(3):183-187.
32. Roberts R.D., Humphreys G.W. Visual context and practice change the distribution of attention in touch. Brain Research 2010, 1351:185-197.
33. Rossetti Y., Stelmach G., Desmurget M., Prablanc C., Jeannerod M. The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability. Experimental Brain Research 1994, 101(2):323-330.
34. Ruben J., Schwiemmann J., Deuchert M., Meyer R., Krause T., Curio G., et al. Somatotopic organization of human secondary somatosensory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2001, 11(5):463-473.
35. Schweizer R., Braun C., Fromm C., Wilms A., Birbaumer N. The distribution of mislocalizations across fingers demonstrates training-induced neuroplastic changes in somatosensory cortex. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 139(4):435-442.
36. Serino A., Farnè A., Rinaldesi M.L., Haggard P., Làdavas E. Can vision of the body ameliorate impaired somatosensory function?. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(5):1101-1107.
37. Staines W.R., Graham S.J., Black S.E., McIlroy W.E. Task-relevant modulation of contralateral and ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex and the role of a prefrontal-cortical sensory gating system. Neuroimage 2002, 15(1):190-199.
38. Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., Haggard P. Vision modulates somatosensory cortical processing. Current Biology 2002, 12(3):233-236.
39. Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., Haggard P. Persistence of visual-tactile enhancement in humans. Neuroscience Letters 2004, 354(1):22-25.
40. Tamè L, Braun C, Farnè A, Lingnau A, Schwarzbach J, Li Hegner Y, and Pavani F. Multiple spatial representation of touch: An fMRI adaptation study. 11th International Multisensory Research Forum, Liverpool, UK, 16-19 June, 2010.
41. Tamè L., Farnè A., Pavani F. Spatial coding of touch at the fingers: Insights from double simultaneous stimulation within and between hands. Neuroscience Letters 2011, 487(1):78-82.
42. Tipper S.P., Lloyd D., Shorland B., Dancer C., Howard L.A., McGlone F. Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. NeuroReport 1998, 9(8):1741-1744.
43. Tipper S.P., Phillips N., Dancer C., Lloyd D., Howard L.A., McGlone F. Vision influences tactile perception at the body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 139(2):160-167.
44. van Beers R.J., Sittig A.C., Denier van der Gon J.J. How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Experimental Brain Research 1996, 111(2):253-261.