Planning activism: Using Social Media to claim marginalized citizens' right to the city

Cities

Volumn 32, Issue , 2013, Pages 88-93

  Tayebi, Ali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Activism; Marginalized voices; Planning; Right to the city; Social Media

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN RIGHTS; MARGINALIZATION; SOCIAL NETWORK; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN SOCIETY;

EID: 84876707407     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BetterBlock.org (2011). About better block. < Accessed 20.01.12. http://betterblock.org/?page_id=721>.
2. Brown, Alison, & Kristiansen, Annali (2008). Urban policies and the right to the city. UNESCO UN-HABITAT.
3. Castells Manuel The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements 1985, University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA.
4. Davidoff Paul Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1965, 31(4):331-338.
5. DrPop.org (2012). Who is Dr. Pop. < Accessed 20.05.12. http://drpop.org/about/>.
6. Flyvbjerg, Bent, & Richardson, Tim (2004). Planning and foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
7. Forester, John (1989). Planning in the face of power. University of California Press.
8. Freire Paulo Pedagogy of the oppressed 1986, Continuum, New York.
9. Friedmann, John (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton University Press.
10. Gibson Donald Communication, power, and media 2004, Nova Publishers, Hauppauge, NY.
11. Habermas, Jürgen (1973). Theory and practice. Beacon Press.
12. Habermas, Jürgen (1987). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.
13. Harvey David The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2003, 27(4):939-941.
14. Healey, Patsy (1991). Debates in planning thought. In Huw Thomas & Patsy Healey (Eds.), Dilemmas of planning practice: Ethics, legitimacy, and the validation of knowledge. Avebury Technical.
15. Hillier, Jean (2002a). Direct action and agonism in democratic planning practice. In Mark Tewdwr-lones (Ed.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory. Psychology Press.
16. Hillier, Jean (2002b). Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning. Psychology Press.
17. i-Neighbors.org (2012). How it works? < Accessed 05.05.12. http://www.i-neighbors.org/howitworks.php>.
18. Innes Judith E., Booher David E. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association 1999, 65(4):412-423.
19. Lefebvre, Henri (1996a). The right to the city. In Writings on cities (Trans. Elizabeth Lebas). Wiley-Blackwell.
20. Lefebvre, Henri (1996b). Eleonore Kofman & Elizabeth Lebas (Eds.), Writings on cities (Trans. Eleonore Kofman & Elizabeth Lebas). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
21. Lefebvre, Henri (2009). Space social product and use value. In Henri Lefebvre, Neil Brenner & Stuart Elden (Eds.), State, space, world: Selected essays. University of Minnesota Press.
22. Marcuse, Peter (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City 13 2(3), 185-197.
23. Norris Christopher Contest of faculties: Philosophy and theory after deconstruction 1985, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY.
24. Tewdwr-Jones, Mark, & Allmendinger, Philip (2002). Communicative planning, collaborative planning and the post-positivist planning theory landscape. In Mark Tewdwr-lones (Ed.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory. Psychology Press.