A novel "Integrated Biomarker Response" calculation based on reference deviation concept

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 2721-2725

  Sanchez, Wilfried ^a   Burgeot, Thierry ^b   Porcher, Jean Marc ^a  

^a INSTITUT NATIONAL DE L ENVIRONNEMENT INDUSTRIEL ET DES RISQUES INERIS   (France)

^b IFREMER   (France)

Author keywords

Biomarkers; Data analysis; Graphic tools; Three spined stickleback

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKER; BIOMONITORING; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA SET; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GRAPHICAL METHOD; TELEOST;

GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS;

EID: 84876701023     PISSN: 09441344     EISSN: 16147499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1359-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arzate-Cardenas MA, Martinez-Jeronimo F (2011) Age-altered susceptibility in hexavalent chromium-exposed Daphnia schodleri (Anomopoda: Daphniidae): integrated biomarker response implementation. Aquat Toxicol 105: 528-534.
2. Barillet S, Adam C, Palluel O, Devaux A (2007) Bioaccumulation, oxidative stress, and neurotoxicity in Danio rerio exposed to different isotopic compositions of uranium. Environ Toxicol Chem 26: 497-505.
3. Beliaeff B, Burgeot T (2002) Integrated biomarker response: a useful tool for ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 1316-1322.
4. Broeg K, Westernhagen HV, Zander S, Korting W, Koehler A (2005) The "bioeffect assessment index" (BAI): a concept for the quantification of effects of marine pollution by an integrated biomarker approach. Mar Pollut Bull 50: 495-503.
5. Chèvre N, Gagné F, Blaise C (2003) Development of a biomarker-based index for assessing the ecotoxic potential of aquatic sites. Biomarkers 8: 287-298.
6. Damiens G, Gnassia-Barelli M, Loques F, Romeo M, Salbert V (2007) Integrated biomarker response index as a useful tool for environmental assessment evaluated using transplanted mussels. Chemosphere 66: 574-583.
7. Hagger JA, Jones MB, Lowe D, Leonard DRP, Owen R, Galloway TS (2008) Application of biomarkers for improving risk assessments of chemicals under the Water Framework Directive: a case study. Mar Pollut Bull 56: 1111-1118.
8. ICES (2011) Report of the Study Group on Integrated Monitoring of Contaminants and Biological Effects (SGIMC), 14-18 March 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2011/ACOM: 30. 265 pp.
9. Kirby MF, Smith AJ, Rooke J, Neall P, Scott AP, Katsiadaki I (2007) Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) and vitellogenin (VTG) in flounder (Platichthys flesus): system interaction, crosstalk and implications for monitoring. Aquat Toxicol 81: 233-244.
10. Lyons BP, Thain JE, Stentiford GD, Hylland K, Davies IM, Vethaak AD (2010) Using biological effects tools to define good environmental status under the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Pollut Bull 60: 1647-1651.
11. Narbonne JF, Daubèze M, Clérandeau C, Garrigues P (1999) Scale of classification based on biochemical markers in mussels: application to pollution monitoring in European coasts. Biomarkers 4: 415-424.
12. Payne JF, Mathieu A, Melvin W, Fancey LL (1996) Acetylcholinesterase, an old biomarker with a new future? Field trials in association with two urban rivers and a paper mill in Newfoundland. Mar Pollut Bull 32: 225-231.
13. Sanchez W, Porcher JM (2009) Fish biomarkers for environmental monitoring within the Water Framework Directive. TRAC-Trend Anal Chem 28: 150-158.
14. Sanchez W, Katsiadaki I, Piccini B, Ditche JM, Porcher JM (2008a) Biomarker responses in wild three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) as a useful tool for freshwater biomonitoring: a multiparametric approach. Environ Int 34: 490-498.
15. Sanchez W, Piccini B, Ditche JM, Porcher JM (2008b) Assessment of seasonal variability of biomarkers in three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) from a low contaminated stream: implication for environmental biomonitoring. Environ Int 34: 791-798.
16. Sanchez W, Piccini B, Maillot-Maréchal E, Porcher JM (2010) Comparison of two reference systems for biomarker data analysis in a freshwater biomonitoring context. Environ Int 36: 377-382.
17. Sanchez W, Burgeot T, Perceval O (2011) Perspectives from the French workshop on the development and validation of biomarkers and bioassays for the monitoring of aquatic environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19: 1345-1347.
18. Serafim A, Company R, Lopes B, Fonseca VF, França S, Vasconcelos RP, Bebianno MJ, Cabral HN (2011) Application of an integrated biomarker response index (IBR) to assess temporal variation of environmental quality in two Portuguese aquatic systems. Ecol Indic. doi: 10. 1016/j. ecolind. 2011. 08. 009.
19. Viarengo A, Lowe D, Bolognesi C, Fabbri E, Koehler A (2007) The use of biomarkers in biomonitoring: a 2-tier approach assessing the level of pollutant-induced stress syndrome in sentinel organisms. Comp Biochem Physiol C 146: 281-300.