First-time mothers' wish for a planned caesarean section: Deeply rooted emotions

Midwifery

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 447-452

  Sahlin, M ^a   Carlander Klint, A K ^a   Hildingsson, I ^b   Wiklund, I ^a  

^a DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Mode of delivery; Own request

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; PARITY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS; SWEDEN;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PARITY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SWEDEN;

EID: 84876699765     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Betrán A.P., Merial M., Lauer J.A., et al. Rates of caesarean section; analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2007, 21(2):98-113.
2. Coulter A., Cleary P.D. Patients' experiences with hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs 2001, 20(3):244-252.
3. David-Floyd R. The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2001, 75(1):5-23.
4. Edwards G.J., Davies N.J. Elective caesarean section-the patients choice?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001, 21(2):128-129.
5. Fenwick J., Staff L., Gamble J., Creedy D.K., Bayes S. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal healthy pregnancy. Midwifery 2010, 26(4):394-400. (Epub 2008 December 30).
6. Graneheim, U.H., Lundman, B., 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measurements to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24, 105-112.
7. Health Care Act, 1982:763. Aviable from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/regelverk/lagarochforordningar/halsoochsjukvardslagen%28hsl%29.
8. Hellmark-Lindgren B. Pregnoscape 2006, Stockholm, Gotab.
9. Hildingsson I., Rådestad I., Rubertsson C., Waldenström U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002, 109(6):618-623.
10. Hildingsson I. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow up studie of womens preferences in early pregnancy. Midwifery 2008, 24(1):46-54.
11. Hildingsson I., Rådestad I., Lindgren H. Birth preferences that deviate from the norm in Sweden: planned home birth versus planned caesarean section. Birth 2010, 37(4):228-295.
12. International Code of Ethics for Midwives. Aviable from: http://www.barnmorskeforbundet.se.
13. Joseph K.S., Young D., Dodds L., et al. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric pratice and recent increases in primary caesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003, 102(4):791-800.
14. Karlström A., Engström-Olofsson R., Nystedt A., Thomas J., Hildingsson I. Swedish caregivers attitudes towards caesarean section on maternal request. Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives 2009, 22(2):57-63.
15. Karlström A., Rådestad I., Eriksson C., Rubertsson C., Nystedt A., Hildingsson I. Cesarean section without medical reason, 1997 to 2006: a Swedish register study. Birth 2010, 37(1):11-20.
16. Kingdon C., Neilson J., Singleton V., et al. Choice and birth method; mixed-method study of caesarian delivery for maternal request. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009, 116(7):886-895.
17. Kingdon C., Baker L., Lavender T. Systematic review of nulliparous women's views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term sephalic trial. Birth 2006, 33(3):229-237.
18. National Institute of Health, 2006. Cesarean delivery on Maternal Request. State of the Science. William H. Natcher Conference Center, Maryland.
19. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE Clinical Guideline, Caesarean Section, November, 2011.
20. Parkenham S., Chamberlain S.M., Smith G.N. Womens views on elective primary caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2006, 28(12):1089-1094.
21. Report 2011:09 the collaborative project of national medical indications.
22. Robson S., Carey A., Mishra R., Dear K. Elective caesarean delivery at maternal request: a preliminary study of motivations influencing women's decision-making. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008, 48(4):415-420.
23. Stjernholm Y., Petersson K., Eneroth E. Changed indications for cesarean section. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2010, 89(1):49-53.
24. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, 2005. Caesarean section in Sweden 1990-2001 Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2005/2005-112-3.
25. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, 2010. Pregnancies, deliveries and newborn children-medical register of births 1973-2006. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2010/2010-125-5.
26. Waldenström U., Hildingsson I., Ryding E.L. Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006, 113(6):638-646.
27. Wiklund I., Andolff E., Lilja H., Hildingsson I., Indication for caesarian section on maternal request. Sexual and Reproductive Health Care. In press.
28. Wiklund I., Matthiesen A.S., Klang B., Ransjo-Arvidson A.B. A comparative study in Stockholm of labour outcome and women's perceptions of being referred in labour. Midwifery 2002, 18(3):193-199.
29. Wiklund I., Edman G., Larsson C., Andolf E. Personality and mode of delivery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006, 85(10):1225-1230.
30. Wiklund I., Edman G., Ryding E.L., Andolf E. Expectation and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008, 115(3):324-331.