Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Pimentel, Eduardo C G ^a   Wensch Dorendorf, Monika ^b   König, Sven ^a   Swalve, Hermann H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALLELE; DAM; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; SELECTION; ANIMAL COMMUNITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE;

ANIMALIA;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84876689232     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-12     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
2. Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America. Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS, Jansen GB, Schaeffer LR, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 2106 2117 10.3168/jds.2007-0553 18420642 (Pubitemid 351730915)
3. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for milk production and composition traits in Holstein cattle. Pimentel ECG, Erbe M, König S, Simianer H, Front Genet 2011 2 19 22303315
4. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 4114 4129 10.3168/jds.2011-5019 22720968
5. Using whole-genome sequence data to predict quantitative trait phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Ober U, Ayroles JF, Stone EA, Richards S, Zhu D, Gibbs RA, Stricker C, Gianola D, Schlather M, Mackay TFC, Simianer H, PLoS Genet 2012 8 1002685 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685 22570636
6. Extensive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in cattle. Farnir F, Coppieters W, Arranz JJ, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Grisart B, Karim L, Marcq F, Moreau L, Mni M, Nezer C, Simon P, Vanmanshoven P, Wagenaar D, Georges M, Genome Res 2000 10 220 227 10.1101/gr.10.2.220 10673279 (Pubitemid 30119590)
7. Linkage disequilibrium in domestic sheep. McRae AF, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, Wilson T, Crawford AM, Slate J, Genetics 2002 160 1113 1122 11901127 (Pubitemid 34263474)
8. Extent and consistency across generations of linkage disequilibrium in commercial layer chicken breeding populations. Heifetz EM, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan N, Zhao H, Dekkers JCM, Soller M, Genetics 2005 171 1173 1181 10.1534/genetics.105.040782 16118198 (Pubitemid 43234849)
9. Linkage disequilibrium decay and haplotype block structure in the pig. Amaral AJ, Megens HJ, Crooijmans RPMA, Heuven HCM, Groenen MAM, Genetics 2008 179 569 579 10.1534/genetics.107.084277 18493072
10. Linkage disequilibrium and historical effective population size in the Thoroughbred horse. Corbin LJ, Blott SC, Swinburne JE, Vaudin M, Bishop SC, Woolliams JA, Anim Genet 2010 41 Suppl. 2 8 15 21070270
11. A hidden Markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Druet T, Georges M, Genetics 2010 184 789 798 10.1534/genetics.109. 108431 20008575
12. Imputation of missing genotypes from sparse to high density using long-range phasing. Daetwyler HD, Wiggans GR, Hayes BJ, Woolliams JA, Goddard ME, Genetics 2011 189 317 327 10.1534/genetics.111.128082 21705746
13. A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes. Hickey JM, Kinghorn BP, Tier B, Wilson JF, Dunstan N, van der Werf JHJ, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 12 10.1186/1297-9686-43-12 21388557
14. FImpute-An efficient imputation algorithm for dairy cattle populations. Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel FS, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 1 421
15. Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes. VanRaden PM, O'Connell JR, Wiggans GR, Weigel KA, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 10 10.1186/1297-9686-43-10 21366914
16. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Daetwyler HD, Kijas JW, van der Werf JHJ, Anim Genet 2012 43 72 80 22742505
17. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Browning BL, Browning SR, Am J Hum Genet 2009 84 210 223 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005 19200528
18. The use of family relationships and linkage disequilibrium to impute phase and missing genotypes in up to whole-genome sequence density genotypic data. Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME, Genetics 2010 185 1441 1449 10.1534/genetics.110.113936 20479147
19. Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Verbyla KL, Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME, Genet Res 2009 91 307 311 10.1017/S0016672309990243
20. Dimension reduction and variable selection for genomic selection: application to predicting milk yield in Holsteins. Long N, Gianola D, Rosa GJ, Weigel KA, J Anim Breed Genet 2011 128 247 257 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00917.x 21749471
21. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Weigel KA, de los Campos G, González-Recio O, Naya H, Wu XL, Long N, Rosa GJM, Gianola D, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 5248 5257 10.3168/jds.2009-2092 19762843
22. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM, Genetics 2009 182 343 353 10.1534/genetics.108.100289 19299339
23. Reliability increases from combining 50,000- and 777,000-marker genotypes from four countries. VanRaden PM, Olson KM, Null DJ, Sargolzaei M, Winters M, van Kaam JBCHM, Interbull Bull 2012 46 75 79
24. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 16 24 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 19109259
25. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle. Weigel KA, de los Campos G, Vazquez AI, Rosa GJM, Gianola D, Van Tassel CP, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 5423 5435 10.3168/jds.2010-3149 20965358
26. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations. Dassonneville R, Brøndum RF, Druet T, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Ducrocq V, Su G, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 3679 3686 10.3168/jds.2011-4299 21700057
27. Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low density genotyped individuals. Cleveland MA, Hickey JM, Kinghorn BP, BMC Proc 2011 5 6 22373271
28. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle. Pszczola M, Mulder HA, Calus MPL, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 431 441 10.3168/jds.2009-2840 21183054
29. A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation. Hickey JM, Kinghorn BP, Tier B, van der Werf JHJ, Cleveland MA, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 9 10.1186/1297-9686-44-9 22462519
30. Genome-wide associations for fertility traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows using data from experimental research herds in four European countries. Berry DP, Bastiaansen JWM, Veerkamp RF, Wijga S, Wall E, Berglund B, Calus MPL, Animal 2012 6 1206 1215 10.1017/S1751731112000067 23217223
31. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Scheet P, Stephens M, Am J Hum Genet 2006 78 629 644 10.1086/502802 16532393
32. QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock. Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS, Bioinformatics 2009 25 680 681 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp045 19176551
33. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Henderson CR, Biometrics 1975 31 423 447 10.2307/2529430 1174616
34. Prediction of unobserved single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes of Jersey cattle using reference panels and population-based imputation algorithms. Weigel KA, Van Tassell CP, O'Connell JR, VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 2229 2238 10.3168/jds.2009-2849 20412938
35. Comparison of different imputation methods. Johnston J, Kistemaker G, Sullivan PG, Interbull Bull 2011 44 25 33
36. Imputation in Swiss cattle breeds. Gredler B, Seefried FR, Schuler U, Bapst B, Schnyder U, Hickey JM, Interbull Bull 2011 44 8 11
37. Factors affecting the accuracy of genotype imputation in populations from several maize breeding programs. Hickey JM, Crossa J, Babu R, de los Campos G, Crop Sci 2012 52 654 663 10.2135/cropsci2011.07.0358
38. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Wooliams JA, Genetics 2010 185 1021 1031 10.1534/genetics.110.116855 20407128
39. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Goddard ME, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696