When can a woman have an intrauterine device inserted? A systematic review

Contraception

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 666-673

  Whiteman, Maura K ^a   Tyler, Crystal P ^a   Folger, Suzanne G ^a   Gaffield, Mary E ^b   Curtis, Kathryn M ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Insertion; Intrauterine devices; Menstruation; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; LEVONORGESTREL;

AMENORRHEA; BLEEDING; DATA SYNTHESIS; DEVICE SAFETY; DRUG EFFICACY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; MEDLINE; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; OLIGOMENORRHEA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PEER REVIEW; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; MENSTRUAL CYCLE;

EID: 84876672053     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.015     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. World Health Organization Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use 2nd ed. 2004 World Health Organization Geneva
2. A.P. Mohllajee, K.M. Curtis, R.G. Flanagan, W. Rinehart, M.L. Gaffield, and H.B. Peterson Keeping up with evidence: A new system for WHO's evidence-based family planning guidance Am J Prev Med 28 2005 483 490 (Pubitemid 40723585)
3. R.P. Harris, M. Helfand, and S.H. Woolf Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process Am J Prev Med 20 2001 21 35 (Pubitemid 33732964)
4. O. Akinla, T. Luukkainen, and H. Timonen Important factors in the use-effectiveness of the copper-T-200 IUD Contraception 12 1975 697 707
5. D.A. Edelman, J. Zipper, M. Rivera, and M. Medel Timing of the IUD insertion Contraception 19 1979 449 454 (Pubitemid 9174397)
6. N.D. Goldstuck Pain response following insertion of a Gravigard (Copper-7) intrauterine contraceptive device in nulliparous women Int J Fertil 26 1981 53 56 (Pubitemid 11156418)
7. N.D. Goldstuck, and M.L. Matthews A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device Clin Reprod Fertil 3 1985 65 71 (Pubitemid 15061830)
8. D. Hubacher, V. Reyes, and S. Lillo Preventing copper intrauterine device removals due to side effects among first-time users: randomized trial to study the effect of prophylactic ibuprofen Hum Reprod 21 2006 1467 1472 (Pubitemid 44445023)
9. D.A. Kokonya, S.K. Sinei, C.B. Sekadde-Kigondu, C.S. Morrison, C. Kwok, and D.H. Weiner Experience with IUCD insertion outside of menses in Kenya East Afr Med J 77 2000 369 373 (Pubitemid 33209469)
10. M.K. White, H.W. Ory, J.B. Rooks, and R.W. Rochat Intrauterine device termination rates and the menstrual cycle day of insertion Obstet Gynecol 55 1980 220 224 (Pubitemid 10174303)
11. J. Zhang, P.J. Feldblum, I.C. Chi, and M.G. Farr Risk factors for copper T IUD expulsion: an epidemiologic analysis Contraception 46 1992 427 433
12. A.J. Wilcox, D. Dunson, and D.D. Baird The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study BMJ 321 2000 1259 1262
13. A.J. Wilcox, D.B. Dunson, C.R. Weinberg, J. Trussell, and D.D. Baird Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives Contraception 63 2001 211 215 (Pubitemid 32480203)
14. Centers For Disease Control, Prevention U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010: adapted from the World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 4th edition MMWR Recomm Rep 59 2010 1 86
15. K. Cleland, H. Zhu, N. Goldstuck, L. Cheng, and J. Trussell The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: A systematic review of 35 years of experience Hum Reprod 27 2012 1994 2000