Using conceptual graph theory to support schema integration

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 823 LNCS, Issue , 1994, Pages 283-296

  Johannesson, Paul ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPH THEORY; SEMANTICS;

CASE GRAMMARS; CONCEPTUAL GRAPH; CONCEPTUAL RELATIONS; CONCEPTUAL SCHEMAS; SCHEMA INTEGRATION;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 84876639427     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0024374     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. C. Batini, M. Lenzcrini and S. B. Navathe, “A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 323-364,1986.
2. C. Bee ri, “Formal Models for Object Oriented Databases”, in First International Conference on Deductive and Object Oriented Databases, Ed. W. Kim, pp. 405-430, Kyoto, North-Holi and, 1989.
3. J. Biskup and B. Convent, MA Formal View Integration Mcthocf’, in International Conference on the Management of Data, Ed. pp. Washington, ACM, 1986.
4. M. Bouzeghoub and I. Comyn-WattUo, '‘View Integration by Semantic Unification and Transformation of Data Structures”, in Ninth International Conference on Entity-Relationship Approach, Ed. H. Kangassalo, pp. 413-430, Lausanne, North-HoUand, 1990.
5. W. Bright and A. Hurson, “A Taxonomy and Current Issues in Muhidatabue Systems”, IEEE Computer, vol. 24, no. 10,1990.
6. B. Bruce, “Case Systems for Natural Language”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, pp. 327-360, 1975.
7. P. P. Chen, “The Endty-Reladonship Model Toward a Unified View of Data”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9-36, 1976.
8. C. Collet, M. Huhns and W. Sben, “Resource Integration Using a Large Knowledge Base in Carnot”, IEEE Computer, pp. 55-62, December 1991.
9. B. Convent, “Unsolvable Problems Related to the View Integration Approach”, in International Conference on Database Theory, Ed. pp. 141-156, Rome, 1986.
10. P. Creasy and B. Moulin, “Extending the Conceptual Graph Approach for Data Conceptual Modelling”, Data and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 223-248, 1992.
11. R. ElMasri, J. Weeldryer and A. Hevner, “The Category Concept: An Extension to the Entity-Relatkmship Model”, Data and Knowledge Engineering, vol., DO., 1985
12. R Galla ire, J. Minker and J. M. Nicholas, “Logic and Databases: A Deductive Approach”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1984.
13. R. Guha and D. Lenat, “CYC: A Midterm Report”, AI Magatine, Fall 1990
14. M. Hammer and D. McLeod, “Database Description with SDM: A Semantic Database Model”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol.6, noj, pp. 351-386, 1981.
15. R. Hull and R. King, “Semantic Database Modeling: Survey, Applications and Rese ardi Issues”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol.19, 00.3, pp. 201-260, 1987.
16. E. J. J. v. Griethuysen, ‘ISO-Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base”, N695, ISO/TC9/SC5/WG3, 1982.
17. P. Johannesson, “A Logic Based Approach to Schema Integration”, in 10th International Conference on Entity-Relationship Approach, Ed. T. Teorey, San Frans isco, North-HoUand, 1991.
18. P. Johannesson, “A Logical Basis for Schema Integration”, in Third International Workshop on Restarch Issues in Data Engineering-Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, Ed. H. Schek, Vienna, IEEE Press, 1993.
19. P. Johannesson, “Schema Transformations as an Aid in View Integration”, in 5th International Conference on Computer Aided Information Systems Engineering, Ed. C Rolland, Paris, Springer, 1993.
20. P. Johannesson, Schema Integration, Schema Translation, and Interoperability in Federated Information Systems, PhD thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, 1993.
21. J. A. Larson, S. Kavathe and R. ElMasri, “A Theory of Attribute Equivalence in Databases with Applications to Schema Integration”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 449-463,1989.
22. J. Lloyd, Foundations of Logic Programming, Springer Verlag, 1987.
23. A. Motro, “Superviews: Virtual Integration of Multiple Databases”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 785-798, 1987.
24. G. Nijssen and T. Halpin, Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design, Prentice*Hall 1989.
25. J. Peckham and F. Maryansld, “Semantic Data Models”, ACM Computing Surveyst vdLJO, noj, pp. 153-190, 1988.
26. A. P. Sbeth and J. A. Larson, “Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 183-236 1990.
27. W. W. Song, P. Johannesson and J. A. Bubenko Jr, “Semantic Similarity Relations in Schema Integration”, in 11th International Coherence on the Entity-Relationship Approach, Ed. A. M. Tjoa, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1992.
28. F. Sows, Conceptual Structures-Information Processing io Mind and Machine, Addison-Wesley, 1984.
29. S. Spaccapietre, C. Parent and Y. Dupont, “Model Independent Assertions for Integration of Heterogeneous Schemas”, The VÙDB Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 81-126, 1992.