Aesthetic impact from wind parks

European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2006, EWEC 2006

Volumn 3, Issue , 2006, Pages 1965-1974

  Tsoutsos, Theocharis ^a   Gouskos, Zacharias ^a   Karterakis, Stefanos ^a   Peroulaki, Elpida ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Visual impact; Wind landscape; Wind systems

Indexed keywords

AESTHETIC IMPACTS; CRITICAL ELEMENTS; ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL INFORMATION; VISUAL IMPACTS; VISUAL LIMIT; WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS; WIND SYSTEMS;

EXHIBITIONS;

WIND POWER;

EID: 84876561770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Kaldelis JK. Social attitude towards wind energy application in Greece. Energy Policy 2005; 33: 595-602.
2. Damborg S. Public Attitude Towards Wind Power. Danish Wind Industry Association 2002; http://www.windpower.org/en/news/articles.
3. Krause LC. Our visual landscape, Managing the landscape under special consideration of visual aspects. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001; 54: 239-254.
4. Clausen NE, Mortensen NG, Hansen JC, Georgy L, Said U. Wind Farm Planning at the Gulf of Suez. New and Renewable Energy Authority (NREA) and Risø National Laboratory, 2004; http://www.risoe.dk/search/search-uk.asp; 06/02/06.
5. Gipe P. Wind Energy, Comes of Age. John Wiley & sons Inc 1995; 289-321.
6. Gipe P. Design as if people matter: aesthetic guidelines for the wind industry. American Wind Energy Assoc. Conference in Washington, DC, 1995, http://www.wind-works.org/articles/design.html; 06/02/06.
7. Pasqualetti M, Gipe P, Righter R. Wind Power in View, Energy landscapes in a crowded world, Academic Press, 2002; 176-222.
8. Owens MP. Four Turbines on East Mountain: An examination of wind farm Aesthetics in the Vermont Landscape. EMWF Aesthetic Analysis, 2003; 2-23.
9. Vissering J. Wind Energy and Vermont's Scenic Landscape, a discussion based on the Woodbury Stakeholder Workshops, http://publicservice.vermont.gov/ energyefficiency/ee-files/wind/vissering-report.pdf; 06/02/06.
10. Cañas C, Lago L, García M, Ruiz F. Comparative study of visual impact on agricultural constructions and windfarms in Spain. financed study by CICYT no AMB95-0225, http://cum.unex.es/profesores/lgmoruno/50. Investigacion/10.Criterios/1997.Aerogeneradores.pdf;10/08/05
11. http://www.emd.dk/WindPRO/Introduction/; 06/02/06
12. Hurtado JP, Fernandez J, Parrondo J, Blanco E. Spanish method of visual impact evaluation in wind farms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2004; 8: 483-491.
13. Shang H, Bishop D. Visual thresholds for detection, recognition and visual impact in landscape settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2000; 20: 125-140.
14. Bishop ID. Determination of thresholds of visual impact: the case of wind turbines. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2002; 29: 707-718.