Cul-de-sac kids

Childhood

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 229-243

  Hochschild, Thomas R ^a  

^a VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Childhood play; cul de sac; instant playground; neighborly guardianship; place work; street panopticism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876555209     PISSN: 09075682     EISSN: 14617013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0907568212458128     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Trends in media use from children and young people. 2010;:.
2. Bates D.British children spend an average of five hours and 20 minutes a day glued to the TV.Mail Online News. 2008;:.
3. Blackford H.Playground panopticism: Ring-around-the-children, a pocketful of women.Childhood. 2004;11 (2): 227-249.
4. Bovill M,Livingstone SChildren and Their Changing Media Environment: A European Comparative Study. Livingstone SBovill M, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:179-200.
5. Brown BB,Werner CW.Social cohesiveness, territoriality, and holiday decorations: The influence of cul-de-sacs.Environment and Behavior. 1985;17 (5): 539-565.
6. Conley DElsewhere, U.S.A.: How We Got from the Company Man, Family Dinners, and the Affluent Society to the Home Office, Blackberry Moms, and Economic Anxiety. New York: Pantheon; 2009:.
7. Ferreira I,Van der Horst K,Wendel-Vos W, et al.Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth: A review and update.Obesity Reviews. 2006;8:129-154.
8. Foucault MDiscipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House; 1975:.
9. Ginsburg KR and the Committee on Communications and the Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health (2007) The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics119(1): 182-191. Available at: www2.aap.org/pressroom/playFINAL.pdf.
10. Harden J.There's no place like home: The public/private distinction in children's theorizing of risk and safety.Childhood. 2000;7 (1): 43-59.
11. Hillman M,Adams J.Children's freedom and safety.Children's Environments. 1992;9 (2): 10-22.
12. Hochschild TR.'Our club': Place-work and the negotiation of collective belongingness.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2010;39 (6): 619-645.
13. HochschildTRJr (2011) Neighbors by design: Determinants and effects of residential social cohesion. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
14. Huttenmoser MDelivering Sustainable Transport: A Social Science Perspective. Root A, ed. New York: Pergamon; 2003:141-149.
15. Jacobs JThe Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House; 1961:.
16. Livingstone SChildren and the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2009:.
17. Lynch KGrowing up in Cities: Studies of the Spatial Environment of Adolescence in Cracow, Melbourne, Mexico City, Salta, Toluca, and Warzawa. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1977:.
18. Mayo JM.Effects of street forms on suburban neighboring behavior.Environment and Behavior. 1979;11 (3): 375-397.
19. Moore RCChildhood's Domain: Play and Place in Child Development. Berkeley, CA: MIG Communications; 1986:.
20. RideoutVJFoehrUGRobertsDF (2010) Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year olds. A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. January. Available at: www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.
21. Sallis JF,Prochaska JJ,Taylor W.A review of the correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000;32 (5): 963-975.
22. Willmott PThe Evolution of a Community: A Study of Dagenham after Forty Years. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1963:.