Invasive hemodynamic characteristics of low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 61, Issue 17, 2013, Pages 1799-1808

  Lauten, Juliane ^a   Rost, Christian ^a   Breithardt, Ole A ^a   Seligmann, Christian ^a   Klinghammer, Lutz ^a   Daniel, Werner G ^a   Flachskampf, Frank A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; cardiac catherization; echocardiography

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MEAN SYSTOLIC TRANSAORTIC GRADIENT; PARADOXIC AORTIC STENOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE VOLUME; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 84876554783     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A. Vahanian, O. Alfieri, F. Andreotti Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J 33 2012 2451 2496
2. R.O. Bonow, B.A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2006 e1 e148
3. K.L. Christensen, H.R. Ivarsen, L. Thuesen, B.A. Kristensen, H. Egeblad Aortic valve stenosis: fatal natural history despite normal left ventricular function and low invasive peak-to-peak pressure gradients Cardiology 102 2004 147 151
4. Z. Hachicha, J.G. Dumesnil, P. Bogaty, P. Pibarot Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival Circulation 115 2007 2856 2864
5. J. Minners, M. Allgeier, C. Gohlke-Baerwolf, R.P. Kienzle, F.J. Neumann, N. Jander Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis Eur Heart J 29 2008 1043 1048
6. E. Barasch, D. Fan, E.O. Chukwu Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights J Heart Valve Dis 17 2008 81 88
7. R.G. Pai, P. Varadarajan, A. Razzouk Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction Ann Thorac Surg 86 2008 1781 1789
8. R. Lang, M. Bierig, R. Devereux Recommendations for chamber quantification A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee, the Task Force on Chamber Quantification, and the European Association of Echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr 7 2006 79 108
9. H. Baumgartner, J. Hung, J. Bermejo Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice Eur J Echocardiogr 10 2009 1 25
10. D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J.G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, L.G. Durand Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity A new index based on the energy loss concept Circulation 101 2000 765 771
11. J. Bermejo, J.L. Rojo-Alvarez, J.C. Antoranz Estimation of the end of ejection in aortic stenosis: an unreported source of error in the invasive assessment of severity Circulation 110 2004 1114 1120
12. E.D. Folland, A.F. Parisi, C. Carbone Is peripheral arterial pressure a satisfactory substitute for ascending aortic pressure when measuring aortic valve gradients? J Am Coll Cardiol 4 1984 1207 1212
13. J. Minners, M. Allgeier, C. Gohlke-Baerwolf, R.P. Kienzle, F.J. Neumann, N. Jander Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function Heart 96 2010 1463 1468
14. S. Miura, T. Arita, A. Isotani Left ventricular function and invasive hemodynamics in low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction (abstr) Eur Heart J 32 Suppl 2011 346
15. D. Messika-Zeitoun, J.M. Serfaty, E. Brochet Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 186 194
16. E. Altiok, R. Koos, J. Schröder Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation Heart 97 2011 1578 1584
17. A.C. Ng, V. Delgado, F. van der Kley Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3 2010 94 102
18. F.A. Flachskampf, A.E. Weyman, J.L. Guerrero, J.D. Thomas Influence of orifice shape, size, and flow rate on effective valve area: an in vitro study J Am Coll Cardiol 15 1990 1173 1180
19. R. Gorlin, S.G. Gorlin Hydraulic formula for calculation of area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves and central circulatory shunts. I Am Heart J 41 1951 1 29
20. C.M. Otto, A.S. Pearlman, K.A. Comess, R.P. Reamer, C.L. Janko, L.L. Huntsman Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography J Am Coll Cardiol 7 1986 509 517
21. C.M. Otto, A.S. Pearlman, C.L. Gardner Experimental validation of Doppler echocardiographic measurement of volume flow through the stenotic aortic valve Circulation 78 1988 435 441
22. D. Garcia, J.G. Dumesnil, L.G. Durand, L. Kadem, P. Pibarot Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity J Am Coll Cardiol 41 2003 435 442
23. I.G. Burwash, D.D. Thomas, M. Sadahiro Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis Circulation 89 1994 827 835
24. J. Segal, D.J. Lerner, D.C. Miller, R.S. Mitchell, E.A. Alderman, R.L. Popp When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula? J Am Coll Cardiol 9 1987 1294 1305
25. L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J.G. Dumesnil, L.G. Durand, P. Pibarot Flow-dependent changes in Doppler-derived aortic valve effective orifice area are real and not due to artifact J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2006 131 137
26. J.G. Dumesnil, R.M. Shoucri Effect of the geometry of the left ventricle on the calculation of ejection fraction Circulation 65 1982 91 98
27. J.M. Strotmann, B. Lengenfelder, J. Blondelot Functional differences of left ventricular hypertrophy induced by either arterial hypertension or aortic valve stenosis Am J Cardiol 101 2008 1493 1497
28. S.H. Poulsen, P. Søgaard, J.E. Nielsen-Kudsk, H. Egeblad Recovery of left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain after valve replacement in aortic stenosis and relation to natriuretic peptides J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20 2007 877 884
29. N. Jander, J. Minners, I. Holme Outcome of patients with low-gradient "severe" aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction Circulation 123 2011 887 895
30. J.G. Dumesnil, P. Pibarot, B. Carabello Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment Eur Heart J 31 2010 281 289
31. M. Briand, J.G. Dumesnil, L. Kadem Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment J Am Coll Cardiol 46 2005 291 298