Open innovation and its relevance to industrial research and development: The case of high-technology small firms

International Small Business Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 319-336

  Oakey, Raymond P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acquisition; clusters; high technology small firms; incubators; intellectual property; open and closed innovation systems; research and development; science parks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876543058     PISSN: 02662426     EISSN: 17412870     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0266242612458942     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Albert P,Bernasconi M,Gaynor LIncubators: The Emergence of new Industry. A Comparison of Players and Their Strategies. Paris: French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry; 2002:.
2. The Financing of Technology-based Small Firms. London: Bank of England; 1996:.
3. The Financing of Technology-based Small Firms. London: Bank of England; 2001:.
4. Benneworth P,Hospers G-J,Timmerman PNew Technology-based Firms in the New Millennium. Oakey RPGroen AVan der Sijde P, ed. Bingley: Emerald Publishing; 2009:147-163.
5. Berlin LThe Man Behind the Microchip: Robert Noyce and the Invention of Silicon Valley. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
6. Cardullo MWTechnological Entrepreneurism. Baldock: Research Studies Press Ltd; 1999:.
7. Chesbrough HWOpen Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2003a:.
8. Chesbrough HW.The era of open innovation.MIT Sloan Management Review. 2003b;44 (3): 35-41.
9. Chesbrough HWOpen Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Chesbrough HWVanhaverbeke WWest J, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:1-12.
10. Chesbrough HWOpen Service Innovation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley; 2010:.
11. Chesbrough HWOpen Business Models. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2011:.
12. Chesbrough HW,Venhaverbeke W,West JOpen Innovation: Researching a New paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
13. Christensen CMThe Innovator's Dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1997:.
14. Tech Stars. London: CBI; 1997:.
15. Cooper AC.The Palo Alto experience.Industrial Research. 1970;:58-84.
16. Denison EThe Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us. London: Allen & Unwin; 1966:.
17. Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy. London: HMSO; 1998:.
18. Innovation Nation. London: HMSO; 2008:.
19. Etzkowitz H,Leydesdorff LUniversities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. London: Pinter; 1997:.
20. Faems DNew Technology-based Firms in the New Millennium. Groen AOakey RPvan der Sijde P, ed. Bingley: Emerald publishing; 2012:109-130.
21. Freeman CThe Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Frances Pinter; 1982:.
22. GanotakisP (2007) Factors affecting the performance and growth of new technology-based firms (NTBF) in the UK. PhD thesis, Aston University.
23. Goddard J,Chatterton P.Regional Development Agencies and the knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 1999;17 (6): 685-699.
24. Hall PGThe Industries of London. London: Hutchinson; 1963:.
25. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (HLSCST) (1997) The innovation exploitation barrier, HL Paper 62. London: HMSO.
26. Inauen M,Shenker-Wicki A.The impact of outside-in innovation on innovation performance.European Journal of Innovation Management. 2011;14 (4): 495-520.
27. Klein-WollhuisRJA (1999) Sleeping with the enemy: Trust, dependence and contracts in inter-organisational relationships. PhD thesis, University of Twente.
28. Lindholm-Dahlstrand A,Klofsten MNew Technology-based Firms in the New Millennium. Oakey RPDuring WKauser S, ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2002:31-46.
29. Macdonald S,Lefang BNew technology-based firms in the 1990s. Oakey RPDuring W, ed. London: Paul Chapman Publishing; 1998:185-208.
30. Mansfield E,Rapaport J,Romeo A, et alThe Production and Application of New Industrial Technology. New York: Jeffrey Norton; 1977:.
31. Marshall APrinciples of Economics. London: Macmillan; 1920:.
32. Martin JEGreater London: An Industrial Geography. London: Bell; 1966:.
33. MasonD (1979) Factors affecting the successful development and marketing innovative semiconductor devices. PhD thesis, University of Sussex.
34. Massey D,Quintas P,Weild DHigh Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society. London: Routledge; 1992:.
35. Oakey RPHigh Technology Small Firms: Innovation and Regional Development in Britain and the United States. London: Frances Pinter; 1984:.
36. Oakey RP.British university science parks and high technology small firms: A comment on the potential for sustained economic growth.International Journal of Small Business. 1985a;4 (1): 58-67.
37. Oakey RPSilicon landscapes. Hall P, ed. London: Allen and Unwin; 1985b:94-117.
38. Oakey RP.Innovation and the management of marketing in high technology small firms.Journal of Marketing Management. 1991;7 (4): 343-356.
39. Oakey RP.Predatory networking: The role of small firms in the development of the British biotechnology industry.International Small Business Journal. 1993;11 (4): 9-22.
40. Oakey RPHigh Technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth. London: Paul Chapman Publishing; 1995:.
41. Oakey RP.Technical entrepreneurship in high technology small firms: Some observations on the implications for management.Technovation. 2003;23 (8): 679-688.
42. Oakey RP.A commentary on gaps in funding for moderate non-stellar growth small businesses in the United Kingdom.Venture Capital. 2007a;9 (3): 223-235.
43. Oakey RP.R&D collaboration between high technology small firms (HTSFs) in theory and practice.R&D Management. 2007b;37 (3): 237-248.
44. OakeyRP (2007c) An analysis of the international trade performance of new high technology firms in and near the Daresbury Innovation Centre, unpublished report to the Daresbury Innovation Centre Director.
45. Oakey RPHigh Technology Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Routledge; 2012:.
46. Oakey RP,Rothwell R,Cooper SYThe Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms. London: Frances Pinter; 1988:.
47. Oakey RP,Faulkner W,Cooper SY, et alNew Firms in the Biotechnology Industry: Their Contribution to Innovation and Growth. London: Frances Pinter; 1990:.
48. Oakey RP,Kipling M,Wildgust S.Clustering among high technology small firms: The anatomy of the non-broadcast visual communications sector.Regional Studies. 2001;35 (5): 401-414.
49. Pittaway L,Robertson MLancaster: Lancaster University Management School; 2004:.
50. Roberts EBEntrepreneurs in High Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991:.
51. Rothwell R,Zegveld WInnovation in the Small and Medium Sized Firm. London: Frances Pinter; 1982:.
52. Rothwell R,Zegveld WReindustrialisation and Technology. London: Longman; 1985:.
53. Russell Group (2010) The economic impact of research conducted in Russell Group universities, Russell Group Papers, issue 1. London: Russell Group.
54. Saxenian AHigh Technology, Space and Society. Castells M, ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985:81-105.
55. Schmookler JInvention and Economic Growth. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 1966:.
56. Schumpeter JBusiness Cycles: a Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1939:.
57. Smith IJ.The effects of external takeovers on manufacturing employment change in the northern region between 1963 and 1973.Regional Studies. 1979;13 (5): 421-437.
58. Solow R.Technical change and the aggregate production function.Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957;39 (3): 312-320.
59. Stockport G,Kakabadse ANew Technology-based Firms in the 1990s. Oakey RP, ed. London: Paul Chapman; 1994:22-35.
60. TaylorMJ (1971) Spatial linkages in the West Midlands iron foundry industry. PhD thesis, University of London.
61. Thwaites AT.Technological change, mobile plants and regional development.Regional Studies. 1978;12 (4): 445-461.
62. Cambridge Science Park Directory. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 1983:.
63. Trott P,Hartmann D.Why open innovation is old wine in new bottles.International Journal of Innovation Management. 2009;13 (4): 715-736.
64. von Hippel E.A customer active paradigm for industrial product idea generation.Research Policy. 1978;7 (3): 240-266.
65. Weber AAlfred Weber's Theory of the Location of Industry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1929:.
66. Westhead P,Cowling M.Employment change in independent owner-managed high technology firms in Great Britain.Small Business Economics. 1995;7 (2): 111-140.
67. Westhead P,Batstone S,Martin F.Technology-based firms located on science parks: The applicability of Bullock's soft-hard model.Enterprise and Innovation Management. 2000;1 (2): 107-139.
68. Williamson OEMarkets and Hierarchies. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1975:.
69. Wise MJ.On the evolution of the gun and jewellery quarters in Birmingham.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 1949;15:57-72.
70. Wolff AWM.China's drive towards innovation.Issues in Science and Technology. 2007;:1.
71. Wood P.Industrial location and linkage.Area. 1969;1 (2): 32-39.