Inmates' Perceptions of the Benefits and Harm of Prison Interviews

Field Methods

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 182-196

  Copes, Heith ^a   Hochstetler, Andy ^b   Brown, Anastasia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

human subjects protection; IRB; prison research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876533405     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: 15523969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X12465798     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bosworth M.,Campbell D.,Demby B.,Ferranti S. M.,Santos M.Doing prison research: Views from inside.Qualitative Inquiry. 2005;11:249-64.
2. Clark T.On being researched: Why do people engage with qualitative research?.Qualitative Research. 2010;10:399-419.
3. Colecchia T.2007:.
4. Copes H.,Brown A.,Tewksbury R.A content analysis of ethnographic research published in top criminology and criminal justice journals from 2000-2009.Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2011;22:341-59.
5. Dugosh K.,Festinger D.,Croft J.,Marlowe D.Measuring coercion to participate in research within a doubly vulnerable population: Initial development of the coercion assessment scale.Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2010;5:93-102.
6. Durcan G.From the inside: Experiences of prison mental health care. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health; 2008:.
7. Fleisher M. S.Warehousing violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989:.
8. Fox K.,Zambrana K.,Lane J.Getting in (and staying in) when everyone else wants to get out: 10 lessons learned from conducting research with inmates.Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2011;22:304-27.
9. Fry C.,Dwyer R.For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research.Addiction. 2001;9:1319-25.
10. Giallombardo R.Society of women. A study of a women's prison. New York: Wiley; 1966:.
11. Jacobs B. A.,Wright R.Street justice: Retaliation in the criminal underworld. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
12. Jacques S.,Wright R.Intimacy with outlaws: The role of relational distance in recruiting, paying, and interviewing underworld research participants.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2008;46:22-38.
13. Jacques S.,.Dangerous intimacy: Toward a theory of violent victimization in active offender research.Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2010;21:503-25.
14. Maruna S.Making good. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001:.
15. Mobley A.,Henry S.,Plemmons D.Protecting prisoners from harmful research.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2008;45:33-46.
16. Moser D. J.,Arndt S.,Kanz J. E.,Benjamin M. L.,Bayless J. D.,Reese R. L.,Paulsen J. S.,Flaum M. A.Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners.Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2004;45:1-9.
17. Patenaude A. L.No promises, but I'm willing to listen and tell what I hear: Conducting qualitative research among prison inmates and staff.The Prison Journal. 2004;84:69-91.
18. Polsky N.Hustlers, beats, and others. 1998. Hustlers, beats, and others, exp. ed. New York: The Lyons Press.New York: The Lyons Press; 1998:.
19. Rosenfeld R.,Jacobs B.,Wright R.Snitching and the code of the street.British Journal of Criminology. 2003;43:291-309.
20. Schlosser J.Issues in interviewing inmates: Navigating the methodological landmines of prison research.Qualitative Inquiry. 2008;14:1500-25.
21. Shover N.Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1996:.
22. Smoyer A.,Blankenship K.,Belt B.Compensation for incarcerated research participants: Diverse state policies suggest a new research agenda.American Journal of Public Health. 2009;99:1746-52.
23. Sykes G. M.The society of captives. A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1958:.
24. Wright R.,Decker S.Armed robbers in action. Boston: Northeastern Press; 1997:.