How important tasks are performed: Peer review

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Hartonen, T ^a   Alava, M J ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; STATISTICS; TIME; WORKLOAD;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; TIME FACTORS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84876525665     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01679     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Azar, O. H. The slowdown in first-response times of economics journals: Can it be beneficial? Econ. Inq. 45, 179-187 (2007).
2. Boldt, A. Extending ArXiv. org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing. J. Schol. Publish. 42, 238-242 (2011).
3. Altschuler, E. L. Peer reviews: in praise of referees. Nature 473, 452 (2011).
4. Bornmann, L., Weymuth, C. & Daniel, H. D. A content analysis of referees' comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low-or high-impact journal differ? Scientometr. 83, 493-506 (2010).
5. Bornmann, L. & Daniel, H. D. Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Res. Eval. 18, 262-272 (2009).
6. Bornmann, L., Nast, I. & Daniel, H. D. Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication. Scientometr 77, 415-432 (2008).
7. Campanario, J. M. & Acedo, E. Rejecting highly cited papers: The views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 58, 734-743 (2007). (Pubitemid 46447179)
8. Wilson, R. 'Referee factor' would reward a vital contribution. Nature 441, 812 (2006).
9. Bedleian, A. G. The manuscript review process-The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. J. Manag. Inq. 12, 331-338 (2003).
10. Campanario, J. M. Peer review for journals as it stands today-Part 1. Sci. Comm. 19, 181-211 (1998).
11. Campanario, J. M. Peer review for journals as it stands today-Part 2. Sci. Comm. 19, 277-306 (1998).
12. Campanario, J. M. Consolation for the scientist-Sometimes it is hard to publish papers that are later highly-cited. Soc. Stud. Sci. 23, 342-362 (1993).
13. Blank, A. F. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing-experimental evidence from the American Economic Review. Amer. Econ. Rev. 81, 1041-1067 (1991).
14. Barabasi, A.-L. TheOrigin of Bursts and Heavy Tails in HumanDynamics. Nature 435, 207 (2005).
15. Malmgren, R. D., Stouffer, D. B., Motter, A. E. & Amaral, L. A. N. A Poissonian explanation for heavy tails in e-mail communication. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18153-18158 (2008).
16. Oliveira, J. G. & Barabasi, A.-L. Darwin and Einstein Correspondence Patterns. Nature 437, 1251 (2005). (Pubitemid 41568662)
17. Malmgren, R. D., Stouffer, D. B., Campanharo, A. S. L. O. & Amaral, L. A. N. On Universality in Human Correspondence Activity. Science 325, 1696 (2009).
18. Wu, Y., Zhou, C., Xiao, J., Kurths, J. & Schellnhuber, H. J. Evidence for a Bimodal Distribution in Human Communications. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 44 (2010).
19. Jo, H.-H., Karsai, M., Kertesz, J. & Kaski, K. Circadian pattern and burstiness in mobile phone communication. New J. Phys 14, 013055 (2012).
20. Walraevens, J., Demoor, T., Maertens, T. & Bruneel, H. Stochastic queueingtheory approach to human dynamics. Phys. Rev. E. 85, 021139 (2012).
21. Jo, H.-H., Pan, R. K. & Kaski, K. Time-varying priority queuing models for human dynamics. Phys. Rev. E85, 066101 (2012).
22. Mryglod, O., Holovatch, Y. & Nryglod, I. Editorial process in scientific journals: analysis and modeling. Preprint arXiv:1109.6211.
23. Payne, S. J., Duggan, G. B. & Neth, H. Discretionary task interleaving: Heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. J. Exp. Psych.: Gen. 136, 370-388 (2007).
24. Gonzales, V. M. & Mark, G. Managing currents of work: multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. ECSCW 2005, Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1822 September 2005, Paris, France, 143-162 (2005).
25. Kalashnikov, V. Geometric Sums: Bounds for Rare Events with Applications. Springer (New York), 1997.
26. Grimm, D. Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published. Science 309, 1974 (2005). (Pubitemid 41362290)
27. Fischer, C. C. Editor as good steward of manuscript submissions: 'Culture,' tone, and procedures. J. Schol. Publ. 36, 34-42 (2004).
28. Kotz, S., Kozubowski, J. & Podgorski, K. The Laplace distribution and generalizations: a revisit with applications to communications, economics, engineering, and finance. Birkhauser, Boston (2001).