Phylogenetic relationships of Mathewsia and Schizopetalon (Brassicaceae) inferred from nrDNA and cpDNA regions: Taxonomic and evolutionary insights from an atacama desert endemic lineage

Taxon

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 343-356

  Toro Núñez, Oscar ^a   Mort, Mark E ^a   Ruiz Ponce, Eduardo ^b   Al Shehbaz, Ihsan A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^c MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Atacama desert; Brassicaceae; cpDNA; Mathewsia; nrDNA; Phylogeny; Schizopetalon

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; DNA; ENDEMIC SPECIES; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

ARGENTINA; CHILE; PERU;

BRASSICACEAE;

EID: 84876512833     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12705/622.4     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1989. Systematics and phylogeny of Schizopetalon (Brassicaceae). Harvard Pap. Bot. 1: 10-46.
2. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2010a. (1965) Proposal to conserve the name Sibara against Machaerophorus (Cruciferae). Taxon 59: 1287-1287.
3. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2010b. A synopsis of the genus Sibara (Brassicaceae). Harvard Pap. Bot. 15: 139-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.3100/025.015.0107
4. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2012a. Machaerophorus is united with the genus Sibara (Brassicaceae). Harvard Pap. Bot. 17: 1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.3100/025.017.0101
5. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2012b. A generic and tribal synopsis of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae). Taxon 61: 913-954.
6. Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Beilstein, M.A. & Kellogg, E.A. 2006. Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): An overview. Pl. Syst. Evol. 259: 89-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0415-z
7. Al-Shehbaz, I.A., German, D.A., Karl, R., Jordon-Thaden, I. & Koch, M. 2011. Nomenclatural adjustments in the tribe Arabideae (Brassicaceae). Pl. Diversity Evol. 129: 71-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/1869-6155/2011/0129-0044
8. Alfaro, M.E. & Holder, M.T. 2006. The posterior and the prior in Bayesian phylogenetics. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 37: 19-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110021
9. Barnéoud, M.J.M. 1845. Observation sur le groupe des Schizopetalées. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., ser. 3, 3: 165-168.
10. Barnéoud, M.J.M. 1846. Schizopetalon and Perreymondia. Pp. 144-150 in: Gay, C. (ed.), Historia fisica y politica de Chile, Botanica. Paris.
11. Beilstein, M.A., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. & Kellogg, E.A. 2006. Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution. Amer. J. Bot. 93: 607-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.4.607
12. Beilstein, M.A., Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Mathews, S. & Kellogg, E.A. 2008. Brassicaceae phylogeny inferred from phytochrome A and ndhF sequence data: Tribes and trichomes revisited. Amer. J. Bot. 95: 1307-1327. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800065
13. Bergsten, J. 2005. Cladistics: A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 21: 163-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x
14. Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408870
15. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00179.x
16. Dillon, M.O. & Rundel, P.W. 1990. The botanical response of the At - cama and Peruvian Desert floras to the 1982-1983 El Niño event. Pp. 487-504 in: Glynn P.W. (ed.), Global ecological consequences of the 1982-83 El Nino-Southern oscillation. Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0422-9894(08)70047-3
17. Dillon, M.O., Tu, T., Xie, L., Quipuscoa Silvestre, V. & Wen, J. 2009. Biogeographic diversification in Nolana (Solanaceae), a ubiquitous member of the Atacama and Peruvian Deserts along the western coast of South America. J. Syst. Evol. 47: 457-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00040.x
18. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.D. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of freash leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
19. Edgar, R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 35: 1792-1797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
20. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00181.x
21. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408678
22. Franzke, A., Lysak, M.A., Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Koch, M.A. & Mummenhoff, K. 2011. Cabbage family affairs: The evolutionary history of Brassicaceae. Trends Pl. Sci. 16: 108-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.11.005
23. Garaventa, A. 1940. El genero Mathewsia en Chile. Revista Univ. (Santiago) 25: 255-267.
24. Gatesy, J., O'Grady, P. & Baker, R.H. 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: Hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level Artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15: 271-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00268.x
25. Gengler-Nowak, K.M. 2002. Reconstruction of the biogeographical history of Malesherbiaceae. Bot. Rev. 68: 171-188.
26. German, D.A. & Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2010. Nomenclatural novelties in miscellaneous Asian Brassicaceae. Nordic J. Bot. 28: 646-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2010.00983.x
27. Gilg, E. & Muschler, R. 1909. Aufzählung aller zur Zeit bekannten südamerikanischen Cruciferen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 42: 437-487.
28. Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S. & Nixon, K.C. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774-786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x
29. Guerrero, P.C., Arroyo, M.T.K., Bustamante, R.O., Duarte, M., Hagemann, T.K. & Walter, H.E. 2011. Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modeling provide insigths in the geographic divergence of Eriocyse subgen. Neoporteria (Cactaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 297: 113-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0512-5
30. Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520
31. Hamilton, M.B. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molec. Ecol. Notes 8: 521-523.
32. Heibl, C. & Renner, S. 2012. Distribution models and dated phylogeny for Chilean Oxalis species reveal occupation of new habitats by different lineages, not rapid adaptive radiation. Syst. Biol. 61: 823-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys034
33. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
34. Katinas, L. & Crisci, J.V. 2000. Cladistic and biogeographic analyses of the genera Moscharia and Polyachyrus (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Syst. Bot. 25: 33-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666671
35. Koch, M., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. & Mummenhoff, K. 2003. Molecular systematics, evolution and population biology in the Mustard family (Brassicaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 90: 151-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3298580
36. Lambkin, C.L., Lee, M.S.Y., Winterton, S.L. & Yeates, D.K. 2002. Partitioned Bremer support and multiple trees. Cladistics 18: 436-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00159.x
37. Lemmon, A.R., Brown, J.M., Stanger-Hall, K. & Moriarty Lemmon, E. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst. Biol. 58: 130-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp017
38. Luebert, F. 2011. Hacia una fitogeografía histórica del Desierto de Atacama. Revista Geogr. Norte Grande 50: 105-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022011000300007
39. Luebert, F. & Pliscoff, P. 2006. Sinopsis bioclimatica y vegetacional de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
40. Luebert, F. & Wen, J. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary diversification of Heliotropium Sect. Cochranea (Heliotropiaceae) in the Atacama Desert. Syst. Bot. 33: 390-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364408784571635
41. Luebert, F., Wen, J. & Dillon, M.O. 2009. Systematic placement and biogeographical relationships of the monotypic genera Gypothamnium and Oxyphyllum (Asteraceae: Mutisioideae) from the Atcama Desert. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 159: 32-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00926.x
42. Mort, M.E., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Francisco-Ortega, J. & Santos-Guerra, A. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Crassulaceae inferred from matK sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 76-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657129
43. Mort, M.E., Archibald, J.K., Randle, C.P., Levsen, N.D., O'Leary, R.T., Topalov, K., Wiegand, C.M. & Crawford, D.J. 2007. Inferring phylogeny at low taxonomic levels: Utility of rapidely evolving cpDNA and nuclear ITS locus. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 173-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.2.173
44. Müller, K.F. 2005. SeqState primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinform. 4: 65-69.
45. Nylander, J.A.A., Wilgenbusch, J.C., Warren, D.L. & Swofford, D.L. 2008. AWTY (are we there yet?): A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24: 581-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm388
46. Peña, C., Wahlberg, N., Weingartner, E., Kodandaramaiah, U., Nylin, S., Freitas, A.V.L. & Brower, A.V.Z. 2006. Higher level phylogeny of Satyrinae butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on DNA sequence data. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 40: 29-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.02.007
47. Posada, D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Molec. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253-1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083
48. Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. 2007. Tracer, version 1.5. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
49. Rauh, W. 1985. The Peruvian-Chilean Deserts. Pp. 239-267 in: Evenari M., Noy-Meir, I. & Goodall, D.W. (eds.), Ecosystems of the World, vol. 12A, Hot deserts and arid shrublands. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
50. Reiche, C. 1895. Schizopetaléas. Pp. 104-109 in: Reiche, C. (ed.), Flora de Chile. Santiago: Imprenta Cervanntes.
51. Rollins, R.C. 1966. The genus Mathewsia (Cruciferae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 15: 102-116.
52. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
53. Rundel, P.W., Dillon, M.O., Palma, B., Mooney, H.A., Gulmon, S.L. & Ehleringer, J.R. 1991. Phytogeography and ecology of the coastal Atacama and Peruvian desert. Aliso 13: 1-50.
54. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller,J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chl oplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.1.142
55. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequence to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in Angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 275-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.3.275
56. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369
57. Stöver, B.C. & Müller, K.F. 2010. TreeGraph 2: Combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. B. M. C. Bioinformatics 11: 7, doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-7
58. Viruel, J., Catalán, P. & Segarra-Moragues, J.G. 2012. Disrupted phylogeographical microsatellite and chloroplast DNA patterns indicate a vicariance rather then long-distance dispersal origin for the disjunct distribution of the Chilean endemic Dioscorea biloba (Dioscoreaceae). J. Biogeogr. 39: 1073-1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02658.x
59. Warwick, S.I., Sauder, C.A., Mayer, M.S. & Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2009. Phylogenetic relationships in the tribes Schizopetaleae and Thelypodieae (Brassicaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS region and plastid ndhF DNA sequences. Botany 87: 961-985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/B09-051
60. Warwick, S.I., Mummenhoff, K., Sauder, C.A., Koch, M. & Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2010. Closing the gaps: Phylogenetic relationship in the Brassicaceae based on DNA sequence data of nuclear ribosomal ITS region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 285: 209-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0271-8
61. Waterhouse, A.M., Procter, J.B., Martin, D.M.A., Clamp, M. & Barton, G.J. 2009. Jalview version 2: A multiple sequence alignment and analyst workbench. Bioinformatics 25: 1189-1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
62. Wen, J. & Zimmer, E.A. 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae): Inferences from ITS sequences of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 6: 167-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1996.0069
63. Wendel, J.F. & Doyle, J.D. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruences: Window into genome history and molecular evolution. Pp. 1-42 in: Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S. & Doyle, J.D. (eds.), Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_10
64. Wiens, J.J. & Morrill, M.C. 2011. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: Reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Syst. Biol. 60: 719-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syr025
65. Wright, S.D., Yong, C.G., Wichman, S.R., Dawson, J.W. & Gardner, R.C. 2001. Steeping stones to Hawaii: A trans-equatorial dispersal pathway for Metrosideros (Myrtaceae) inferred from nrDNA (ITS+ETS). J. Biogeogr. 28: 769-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00605.x
66. Zwickl, D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Texas, U.S.A.