Mapping the Oxford hip score onto the EQ-5D utility index

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 665-675

  Pinedo Villanueva, Rafael A ^a   Turner, David ^a   Judge, Andrew ^b   Raftery, James P ^a   Arden, Nigel K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Health utility; Hip replacement; Outcomes mapping; Oxford hip score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; ARTICLE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84876502642     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0174-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bozic, K. J., Saleh, K. J., Rosenberg, A. G., & Rubash, H. E. (2004). Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty: Analysis and review of the literature. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 19(2), 180-189.
2. Maynard, A. (1991). Developing the health care market. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1277-1286.
3. Bourne, R. B., Rorabeck, C. H., Laupacis, A., Feeny, D., Wong, C., Tugwell, P., et al. (1994). A randomized clinical trial comparing cemented to cementless total hip replacement in 250 osteoarthritic patients: The impact on health related quality of life and cost effectiveness. Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, 14, 108-114.
4. Chang, R. W., Pellissier, J. M., & Hazen, G. B. (1996). A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA, 275(11), 858-865.
5. Ethgen, O., & Reginster, J.-Y. (2004). Degenerative musculoskeletal disease. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63(1), 1-3.
6. Murray, D., Carr, A., & Bulstrode, C. (1995). Which primary total hip replacement? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British, 77-B(4), 520-527.
7. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. (2010). 7th Annual Report.
8. Department of Health. (2008). Guidance on the routine collection of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) - For the NHS in England 2009/10: Department of Health.
9. Murray, D. W., Fitzpatrick, R., Rogers, K., Pandit, H., Beard, D. J., Carr, A. J., et al. (2007). The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British, 89-B(8), 1010-1014.
10. Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A., & Murray, D. (1996). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British, 78-B(2), 185-190.
11. Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Frost, S., Gundle, R., McLardy-Smith, P., & Murray, D. (2001). Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British, 83-B(8), 1125-1129.
12. Field, R. E., Cronin, M. D., & Singh, P. J. (2005). The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British, 87-B(5), 618-622.
13. Dolan, P., Gudex, C., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (1996). The time trade-off method: Results from a general population study. Health Economics, 5(2), 141-154.
14. Brazier, J., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., & Rowen, D. (2010). A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. The European Journal of Health Economics, 11(2), 215-225.
15. Bansback, N., Marra, C., Tsuchiya, A., Anis, A., Guh, D., Hammond, T., et al. (2007). Using the health assessment questionnaire to estimate preference-based single indices in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 57(6), 963-971.
16. Grootendorst, P., Marshall, D., Pericak, D., Bellamy, N., Feeny, D., & Torrance, G. W. (2007). A model to estimate health utilities index mark 3 utility scores from WOMAC index scores in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The Journal of Rheumatology, 34(3), 534-542.
17. Browne, J., Jamieson, L., Lewsey, J., Meulen, J. V. d., Black, N., Cairns, J., et al. (2007). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in elective surgery - Report to the Department of Health. Retrieved 17 November, 2010, from http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/php/hsrp/research/proms-report-12-dec-07.pdf.
18. Mortimer, D., & Segal, L. (2008). Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights. Medical Decision Making, 28(1), 66-89.
19. Gray, A. M., Rivero-Arias, O., & Clarke, P. M. (2006). Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Medical Decision Making, 26(1), 18-29.
20. Tsuchiya, A., Brazier, J., McColl, E., & Parkin, D. (2002). Deriving preference-based single indices from non-preference based condition-specific instruments: Converting AQLQ into EQ5D indices: School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield.
21. Crott, R., & Briggs, A. (2010). Mapping the QLQ-C30 quality of life cancer questionnaire to EQ-5D patient preferences. The European Journal of Health Economics, 11(4), 427-434.