-
1
-
-
70449107340
-
Resection for esophageal cancer in the elderly
-
20066945 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2009.06.002
-
Chang AC, Lee JS. Resection for esophageal cancer in the elderly. Thorac Surg Clin. 2009;19:333-43.
-
(2009)
Thorac Surg Clin
, vol.19
, pp. 333-343
-
-
Chang, A.C.1
Lee, J.S.2
-
2
-
-
79952771290
-
Update on anesthetic management for esophagectomy
-
10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834141f7
-
Ng JM. Update on anesthetic management for esophagectomy. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2011;24:37-43.
-
(2011)
Curr Opin Anesthesiol
, vol.24
, pp. 37-43
-
-
Ng, J.M.1
-
3
-
-
67349276642
-
Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy
-
18542990 10.1007/s00423-008-0354-y
-
Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T, Namikawa T, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M, et al. Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:617-21.
-
(2009)
Langenbecks Arch Surg
, vol.394
, pp. 617-621
-
-
Kitagawa, H.1
Akimori, T.2
Okabayashi, T.3
Namikawa, T.4
Sugimoto, T.5
Kobayashi, M.6
-
4
-
-
0028281980
-
Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: A randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function
-
McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Ramsay G, Sunderland G, Baxter JN, Anderson JR, et al. Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery. 1994;115:533-9. (Pubitemid 24137199)
-
(1994)
Surgery
, vol.115
, Issue.5
, pp. 533-539
-
-
McMahon, A.J.1
Russell, I.T.2
Ramsay, G.3
Sunderland, G.4
Baxter, J.N.5
Anderson, J.R.6
Galloway, D.7
O'Dwyer, P.J.8
-
5
-
-
0025812259
-
Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparison of postoperative pulmonary function
-
1828139 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00016 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3kslyqsQ%3D%3D
-
Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg. 1991;213:651-4.
-
(1991)
Ann Surg
, vol.213
, pp. 651-654
-
-
Frazee, R.C.1
Roberts, J.W.2
Okeson, G.C.3
Symmonds, R.E.4
Snyder, S.K.5
Hendricks, J.C.6
-
6
-
-
0027260868
-
Pulmonary function after cholecystectomy performed through Kocher's incision, a mini-incision, and laparoscopy
-
Coelho JC, de Araujo RP, Marchesini JB, Coelho IC, de Araujo LR. Pulmonary function after cholecystectomy performed through Kocher's incision, a mini-incision, and laparoscopy. World J Surg. 1993;17:544-6. (Pubitemid 23228410)
-
(1993)
World Journal of Surgery
, vol.17
, Issue.4
, pp. 544-546
-
-
Coelho, J.C.U.1
De Araujo, R.P.M.2
Marchesini, J.B.3
Coelho, I.C.M.M.4
De Araujo, L.R.R.5
Sandrikov, V.A.6
-
7
-
-
70350037894
-
Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy
-
19184209 10.1007/s00464-008-0310-5
-
Choi YS, Shim JK, Na S, Hong SB, Hong YW, Oh YJ. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2286-91.
-
(2009)
Surg Endosc
, vol.23
, pp. 2286-2291
-
-
Choi, Y.S.1
Shim, J.K.2
Na, S.3
Hong, S.B.4
Hong, Y.W.5
Oh, Y.J.6
-
8
-
-
42149126063
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer:laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
-
18071806 10.1007/s00464-007-9697-7 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3ksVGlsg%3D%3D
-
Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadiere GB. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer:laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1060-9.
-
(2008)
Surg Endosc
, vol.22
, pp. 1060-1069
-
-
Dapri, G.1
Himpens, J.2
Cadiere, G.B.3
-
9
-
-
78149409750
-
Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning
-
20526722 10.1007/s00540-010-0968-4
-
Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Akimori T, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning. J Anesth. 2010;24:803-6.
-
(2010)
J Anesth
, vol.24
, pp. 803-806
-
-
Yatabe, T.1
Kitagawa, H.2
Yamashita, K.3
Akimori, T.4
Hanazaki, K.5
Yokoyama, M.6
-
10
-
-
20844432023
-
Enhanced recovery after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection
-
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002, PII S0261561405000233
-
Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:466-77. (Pubitemid 40668435)
-
(2005)
Clinical Nutrition
, vol.24
, Issue.3
, pp. 466-477
-
-
Fearon, K.C.H.1
Ljungqvist, O.2
Von Meyenfeldt, M.3
Revhaug, A.4
Dejong, C.H.C.5
Lassen, K.6
Nygren, J.7
Hausel, J.8
Soop, M.9
Andersen, J.10
Kehlet, H.11
-
11
-
-
72249099449
-
Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery. Results from a prospective observational two-centre study
-
19919920 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MjnsVOmtQ%3D%3D
-
Mohn AC, Bernardshaw SV, Ristesund SM, Hovde Hansen PE, Røkke O. Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery. Results from a prospective observational two-centre study. Scand J Surg. 2009;98:155-9.
-
(2009)
Scand J Surg
, vol.98
, pp. 155-159
-
-
Mohn, A.C.1
Bernardshaw, S.V.2
Ristesund, S.M.3
Hovde Hansen, P.E.4
Røkke, O.5
-
12
-
-
72749105579
-
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery
-
19779947 10.1007/s11605-009-1037-x
-
Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, Strik C, Groenewoud JJ, Brinkert W, van Laarhoven CJ, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:88-95.
-
(2010)
J Gastrointest Surg
, vol.14
, pp. 88-95
-
-
Teeuwen, P.H.1
Bleichrodt, R.P.2
Strik, C.3
Groenewoud, J.J.4
Brinkert, W.5
Van Laarhoven, C.J.6
-
13
-
-
66949117926
-
The effect of a multimodal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver surgery: A multicentre pilot study
-
10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00025.x
-
Stoot JH, van Dam RM, Busch OR, van Hillegersberg R, De Boer M, Olde Damink SW, et al. The effect of a multimodal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentre pilot study. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:140-4.
-
(2009)
HPB (Oxford)
, vol.11
, pp. 140-144
-
-
Stoot, J.H.1
Van Dam, R.M.2
Busch, O.R.3
Van Hillegersberg, R.4
De Boer, M.5
Olde Damink, S.W.6
-
14
-
-
67650710660
-
-
10th edition. Tokyo: Japan Esophageal Society, Kanehara, Co., Ltd.
-
Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 10th edition. Tokyo: Japan Esophageal Society, Kanehara, Co., Ltd. 2008.
-
(2008)
Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer
-
-
-
15
-
-
0034853808
-
What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery?
-
DOI 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02891-0, PII S0003497501028910
-
Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:879-84. (Pubitemid 32846251)
-
(2001)
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
, vol.72
, Issue.3
, pp. 879-884
-
-
Nomori, H.1
Horio, H.2
Naruke, T.3
Suemasu, K.4
-
16
-
-
33745220043
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients
-
16798482 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.03.016
-
Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7-16.
-
(2006)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.203
, pp. 7-16
-
-
Palanivelu, C.1
Prakash, A.2
Senthilkumar, R.3
Senthilnathan, P.4
Parthasarathi, R.5
Rajan, P.S.6
-
17
-
-
33847351179
-
A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection
-
DOI 10.1002/bjs.5468
-
Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:224-31. (Pubitemid 46340405)
-
(2007)
British Journal of Surgery
, vol.94
, Issue.2
, pp. 224-231
-
-
Maessen, J.1
Dejong, C.H.C.2
Hausel, J.3
Nygren, J.4
Lassen, K.5
Andersen, J.6
Kessels, A.G.H.7
Revhaug, A.8
Kehlet, H.9
Ljungqvist, O.10
Fearon, K.C.H.11
Von Meyenfeldt, M.F.12
-
18
-
-
10744223925
-
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 Patients
-
Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486-95. (Pubitemid 38176386)
-
(2003)
Annals of Surgery
, vol.238
, Issue.4
, pp. 486-495
-
-
Luketich, J.D.1
Alvelo-Rivera, M.2
Buenaventura, P.O.3
Christie, N.A.4
McCaughan, J.S.5
Litle, V.R.6
Schauer, P.R.7
Close, J.M.8
Fernando, H.C.9
Zinner, M.J.10
-
19
-
-
84863186344
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for esophageal cancer with the patient in prone position
-
Petri R, Zuccolo M, Brizzolari M, Rossit L, Rosignoli A, Durastante V, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for esophageal cancer with the patient in prone position. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1102-7.
-
(2012)
Surg Endosc
, vol.26
, pp. 1102-1107
-
-
Petri, R.1
Zuccolo, M.2
Brizzolari, M.3
Rossit, L.4
Rosignoli, A.5
Durastante, V.6
-
20
-
-
80051507054
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: The evolution and technique of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer
-
21409606 10.1007/s00268-011-1049-z
-
Hoppo T, Jobe BA, Hunter JG. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: the evolution and technique of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35:1454-63.
-
(2011)
World J Surg
, vol.35
, pp. 1454-1463
-
-
Hoppo, T.1
Jobe, B.A.2
Hunter, J.G.3
-
21
-
-
0037153029
-
Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
-
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa022343
-
Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662-9. (Pubitemid 35340784)
-
(2002)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.347
, Issue.21
, pp. 1662-1669
-
-
Hulscher, J.B.F.1
Van Sandick, J.W.2
De Boer, A.G.E.M.3
Wijnhoven, B.P.L.4
Tijssen, J.G.P.5
Fockens, P.6
Stalmeier, P.F.M.7
Ten Kate, F.J.W.8
Van Dekken, H.9
Obertop, H.10
Tilanus, H.W.11
Lanschot, J.12
-
22
-
-
78651246295
-
Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: A multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial)
-
21226918 10.1186/1471-2482-11-2
-
Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg. 2011;11:2.
-
(2011)
BMC Surg
, vol.11
, pp. 2
-
-
Biere, S.S.1
Maas, K.W.2
Bonavina, L.3
Garcia, J.R.4
Van Berge Henegouwen, M.I.5
Rosman, C.6
|